Athletics | Mo Farah Missed Drug Tests Before Olympics 2012

There's nothing so far more than circumstantial evidence but, added together, it doesn't smell good - missed drug tests at a time of improving performances, a coach with history and a training partner also under suspicion.

However this particular story ends (and I hope there is nothing more to it), I really wonder how much elite sport is "real" - cycling and athletics are the obvious culprits but rugby (compare sizes to 10-15 years ago) and tennis (marathon 5 setters) also raise doubts. Even football unfortunately occasionally looks too good to be true.
 
They need the element of surprise a little bit though http://www.news.com.au/sport/michel...story-never-told/story-fndpv1cc-1226431290041



There were rules broken and he lost an appeal against it too. It's all validated as it went through an appeals process. I like Mo and I hope he's not a doper but there's more than enough messing around here and association to at least have some doubts about him.

I thought they were allowed up to 3 missed tests? The rules are a fecking shambles if they encourage suspicion without someone being found guilty of doping.
 
I thought they were allowed up to 3 missed tests? The rules are a fecking shambles if they encourage suspicion without someone being found guilty of doping.

Yup, they can, but that's still a broken rule (making yourself available to test). He appealed the second one over the doorbell issue and was told something like: intent to test doesn't matter, there's no leeway, and so his appeal failed. A lot of athletes have come out saying that it's very easy to miss tests, but I'm not so sure I'm with them - inconvenience to the athletes is a small price to pay for at least trying to clean up a very dirty sport.
 
If Bolt ever gets caught for doping, Athletics may as well just make doping legal. It would kill the sport hearing that the biggest athlete ever has been a cheat. Going back to "just" sub 10 times would be boring.

Get roided up and see how fast the human can go!
 
Yup, they can, but that's still a broken rule (making yourself available to test). He appealed the second one over the doorbell issue and was told something like: intent to test doesn't matter, there's no leeway, and so his appeal failed. A lot of athletes have come out saying that it's very easy to miss tests, but I'm not so sure I'm with them - inconvenience to the athletes is a small price to pay for at least trying to clean up a very dirty sport.

Sounds like 1 strike and you'e out would eliminate this, and shake the athletics world up.
 
If Bolt ever gets caught for doping, Athletics may as well just make doping legal. It would kill the sport hearing that the biggest athlete ever has been a cheat. Going back to "just" sub 10 times would be boring.

Get roided up and see how fast the human can go!
Stick a V8 on them I say.
 
I don't think the 2 missed tests are a sign of much at all. It's not like missing a doctor's appointment. Many British athletes have missed tests, some multiple - Willamson, Lynne and Lewis-Francis were all on 2, and Ohuruogu of course missed 3. Clearly, the regularity with which this happens suggests that the tests are particularly onerous (which they should be) - but transgressions should be regarded as a technical offence, not a doping one. My gripe with them is that testers seem to take the huff in these circumstances and refuse to test the athlete when they actually want to be tested. Farah missing 2 tests would be unremarkable outside the context of the Salazar association (which is more troublesome).

Farah's rapid rise and quicker times were somewhat unexpected at the time, that's all I'll say.

Not sure what you mean by rapid rise, but his best times are unremarkable - he holds the 64th best time in the 5k and 28th in the 10k. I thought his most impressive performance was his 1500m time. He is successful because he runs tactically well in something of a weak era.
 
track and field will be dead , so many of the power sports (throwing) are dirty. long distance events has had it's share of doping as have the speed events. so it's just another brick in the wall. you almost assume guilt in these cases.
 
I don't think the 2 missed tests are a sign of much at all. It's not like missing a doctor's appointment. Many British athletes have missed tests, some multiple - Willamson, Lynne and Lewis-Francis were all on 2, and Ohuruogu of course missed 3. Clearly, the regularity with which this happens suggests that the tests are particularly onerous (which they should be) - but transgressions should be regarded as a technical offence, not a doping one. My gripe with them is that testers seem to take the huff in these circumstances and refuse to test the athlete when they actually want to be tested. Farah missing 2 tests would be unremarkable outside the context of the Salazar association (which is more troublesome).



Not sure what you mean by rapid rise, but his best times are unremarkable - he holds the 64th best time in the 5k and 28th in the 10k. I thought his most impressive performance was his 1500m time. He is successful because he runs tactically well in something of a weak era.


This sums it up pretty well IMO.
 
There were whispers about Farah in the run up to 2012, feels almost inevitable now...

Maybe we need two parallel competitions - one for clean athletes, one for doped. You get caught doping and it's a life ban from competition or coaching in the clean one.
 
His interview on sky just doesn't ring true. If so many people who worked with his coach are coming forward and saying that they either were advised to take Performance Enhancing Drugs or knew that he was advising athletes to take them I do not believe that Mo knew nothing about it.

If everybody else in his camp knew how could he not know?
 
His interview on sky just doesn't ring true. If so many people who worked with his coach are coming forward and saying that they either were advised to take Performance Enhancing Drugs or knew that he was advising athletes to take them I do not believe that Mo knew nothing about it.

If everybody else in his camp knew how could he not know?

Damn, missed that, was that today? Put up a link if you can
 
Not sure what you mean by rapid rise, but his best times are unremarkable - he holds the 64th best time in the 5k and 28th in the 10k. I thought his most impressive performance was his 1500m time. He is successful because he runs tactically well in something of a weak era.
Spot on.
 
Just a witch hunt to sell some papers, the British media are the worst for loving you when you're on top and then trying to destroy you over nothing stories.
 
All this talk of 'he doesnt seem the sort' and 'its just a witch hunt' all the way to 'well there were rumours' and 'how did he win so much in the circumstances' is EXACTLY how it went with Armstrong.
 
All this talk of 'he doesnt seem the sort' and 'its just a witch hunt' all the way to 'well there were rumours' and 'how did he win so much in the circumstances' is EXACTLY how it went with Armstrong.

That just simply isn't true at all. There were plenty of people that knew for years that Armstrong was a doper. Many tried to expose him over the years until he could run and bully no more.

This is the first time Farah's name has been dragged through them mud and on a guilty by association basis.

He could be doping, you would be naive to believe it is beyond any athlete but as was pointed out earlier in thread, he is actually a long way from doing incredible times and feats, again, unlike Armstrong.
 
That just simply isn't true at all. There were plenty of people that knew for years that Armstrong was a doper. Many tried to expose him over the years until he could run and bully no more.

This is the first time Farah's name has been dragged through them mud and on a guilty by association basis.

He could be doping, you would be naive to believe it is beyond any athlete but as was pointed out earlier in thread, he is actually a long way from doing incredible times and feats, again, unlike Armstrong.

Many claimed they tried to expose Armstrong but the allegations never made it anywhere, rather like what is happening with Mo now. It is of course relative as doping in cycling is far higher on the agenda than long distance running.
 
Last edited:
Many claimed they tried to expose Armstrong but the allegations never made it anywhere, rather like what is happening with Mo now.

Who exactly has made allegations about Mo doping? Are there allegations being suppressed? The Daily Mail ran the piece about him missing tests but simply left it at that knowing the speculation alone would do the inferring for them. The situation at the moment is perfect, and the public and media receptive, should anyone wish to bring forth any evidence/allegations against him.

The media were frothing at the mouth as soon as the Salazar revelations dropped, despite the obvious appetite for destruction the missed tests are the best they could come up with for now. Not that I discount doping on his part (who knows in reality) but if you are going to go about tainting the public perception of an individual then I feel you should probably have more substantial information on which to do so.
 
Just a witch hunt to sell some papers, the British media are the worst for loving you when you're on top and then trying to destroy you over nothing stories.

Especially Oliver Holt at The Daily Mail, he is not letting this go. He wrote this article a week back calling arrogance on athletics reasonable reaction to this with the likes of Steve Cram for not 'getting it'.
 
Especially Oliver Holt at The Daily Mail, he is not letting this go. He wrote this article a week back calling arrogance on athletics reasonable reaction to this with the likes of Steve Cram for not 'getting it'.
There is no smoke without fire, I am the first to always say this but Alberto Salazar and Mo Farah are different individuals. Until someone comes out and say Mo Farah is a cheat, to lambaste him with all this ridicule is very sensationalist. By all means go after Salazar because people are talking about him.
 
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/athletics/33749208

Leaked IAAF doping files: Wada 'very alarmed' by allegations
The World Anti-Doping Agency (Wada) says it is "very alarmed" after fresh allegations of suspected doping emerged in a leak of test data.

The Sunday Times and German broadcaster ARD/WDR have obtained access to the results of 12,000 blood tests from 5,000 athletes.

According to the newspaper, the evidence - which has been seen by the BBC - reveals the "extraordinary extent of cheating" by athletes at the world's biggest events.

Wada's independent commission will investigate the claims in the ARD/WDR documentary Doping - Top Secret: The Shadowy World of Athletics.

Wada president Sir Craig Reedie said his organisation was "very disturbed by these new allegations... which will, once again, shake the foundation of clean athletes worldwide".

The files belong to world governing body the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF), but have been leaked by a whistle-blower.

In a statement, the IAAF said it was "aware of serious allegations made against the integrity and competence of its anti-doping programme".

It added the allegations in the Sunday Times and ARD/WDR "are largely based on analysis of an IAAF database of private and confidential medical data which has been obtained without consent".

"The IAAF is now preparing a detailed response to both media outlets and will reserve the right to take any follow-up action necessary to protect the rights of the IAAF and its athletes."

The Sunday Times and ARD/WDR used two of the world's "foremost anti-doping experts", scientists Robin Parisotto and Michael Ashenden, to review the data.

According to the experts, the database reveals:

  • A third of medals (146, including 55 golds) in endurance events at the Olympics and World Championships between 2001 and 2012 were won by athletes who have recorded suspicious tests. It is claimed none of these athletes have been stripped of their medals.
  • More than 800 athletes - one in seven of those named in the files - have recorded blood tests described by one of the experts as "highly suggestive of doping or at the very least abnormal".
  • A top UK athlete is among seven Britons with suspicious blood scores.
  • British athletes - including Olympic champion heptathlete Jessica Ennis-Hill - have lost out in major events to competitors who were under suspicion.
  • Ten medals at London 2012 were won by athletes who have dubious test results.
  • In some finals, every athlete in the three medal positions had recorded a suspicious blood test.
  • Russia emerges as "the blood testing epicentre of the world" with more than 80% of the country's medals won by suspicious athletes, while Kenya had 18 medals won by suspicious athletes.
  • Stars such as Britain's Mo Farah and Jamaican sprinter Usain Bolt recorded no abnormal results.
  • Athletes are increasingly using blood transfusions and EPO micro-doses to boost the red cell count.
Parisotto said: "Never have I seen such an alarmingly abnormal set of blood values. So many athletes appear to have doped with impunity, and it is damning that the IAAF appears to have idly sat by and let this happen."

According to Ashenden, the files show that athletics is now in the same "diabolical position" as cycling during the Lance Armstrong era. He said it was "a shameful betrayal of [the IAAF's] primary duty to police their sport and to protect clean athletes".

The evidence is not proof of doping - but the revelations will raise more serious questions over whether the sport is doing enough to combat cheating ahead of the World Athletics Championships in Beijing later this month.

The IAAF is due to elect a new president in just over two weeks, with Britain's Lord Coe the favourite to win the election against Sergey Bubka. Coe has made independent testing a key part of his manifesto.

Former Olympic pole vault champion Bubka, now IAAF vice-president, told the BBC: "We will not stop the fight. We know that in the 21st century doping is the biggest danger and there will be zero tolerance. If we need to strengthen our rules and regulations we will do it."

Athletics' world governing body, which has not disputed the authenticity of the database, told the Sunday Times: "The IAAF has always been at the forefront in combating anti-doping, searching and implementing new analytical techniques and methodologies."

The IAAF said that before the introduction in 2009 of the biological passport - which monitors longitudinal blood values - its testers had "systematically pursued" all results that were deemed "atypical" with immediate urine tests for EPO and then target-tested those athletes in and out of competition.

Since the introduction of the passport, the IAAF says it has "pursued more cases under the passport system than all other anti-doping organisations together", and is spending $2m a year on combating cheating. "As a percentage of overall annual budget this is the highest of any sport," it added.

There can be various reasons for abnormal blood samples other than performance-enhancing drugs. Illness, altitude training and pregnancy can all influence values.

In December, ARD/WDR alleged systematic doping in Russian athletics and implicated the IAAF in covering up the problem. The Russian Athletics Federation called the allegations lies, and IAAF president Lamine Diack denied any collusion, although he did admit to the BBC that his sport was "in crisis". Both the IAAF and Wada are investigating the allegations.

The German documentary-makers also claimed an unnamed member of the IAAF medical commission had a list of 150 suspicious blood samples from 2001 to 2008 that were not investigated. Diack described this as "ridiculous".

The IAAF insisted that the whistle-blower would not have known if follow-up tests had been conducted and pointed out that its athlete biological passport scheme was only launched in 2009 and samples before that date did "not have the same level of reliability and strength as the post-2009 values which were collected under strict and stringent conditions".

In June, the BBC's Panorama programme alleged that Mo Farah's coach Alberto Salazar violated various anti-doping rules with other athletes. He denies the allegations, and there is no suggestion that double Olympic champion Farah was guilty of any wrongdoing. UK Anti-Doping and the US Anti-Doping Agency are investigating the claims.

Although it was one of the first sports to introduce the biological passport, athletics has a chequered history of drug scandals, from East Germany's years of state-sponsored doping through to the Balco affair in 2002.

These latest claims could lead to renewed calls for countries to be banned from international competition, and there will be more scrutiny of powerhouse athletics nations like Russia and Kenya. In January, marathon champion Rita Jeptoo became the 45th Kenyan to fail a doping test,while 25 Russian walkers have been suspended for doping offences in the past six years.

London 2012's reputation as the cleanest Games in 50 years will also be questioned, as the sport struggles to assert its credibility and reputation.
 
Don't believe Gatlin is running like this at 33 when he is now also "clean"...

Wouldn't surprise me to find that the muricans have the latest masking or whatever that is beating the testing right now. Also Gay has a pb of 9.69, surely he did this while roided up and before he got banned? Shouldn't that time be wiped away as he hasn't got anywhere near that time since?

God lets hope Bolt wins.
 
The final is at 2:15pm GMT tomorrow, according to the Telegraph. Gatlin looked amazing in the heats, the dodgy cnut.
 
Semi's are 12:10 and then the final is 14:15. You can see the full day by day schedule here:

http://www.iaaf.org/competitions/ia...iaaf-world-championships-4875/timetable/byday

Jess Ennis and KJT go into the second day first and second in the Heptathlon table. Tonight is the long jump and javelin for them (between 2 am and 5 am) and then the final even is the 800M which is tomorrow at 12:40. Looking great for both women so far. KJT somehow pulled it out the bag in the high jump despite being an absolute mess in it, great viewing.

Edit: Also a lot of people doubting Bolt. Big mistake.
 

I don't understand how people haven't yet clicked on to the fact that all the top athletes in certain sports are doping. In sports like sprinting and weightlifting it would be IMPOSSIBLE to break records and win championships without the use of PEDs. In fact even the best would not come close. I'm sure it is the same for endurance events also. Doubly so for female athletes.