And yet we think we're the only ones
Who's we?
And yet we think we're the only ones
No. It's ~350 million light-years away from Earth, and not hurtling in our direction. But we will be 'swallowed' by Andromeda in ~3.8 billion years (approaching us at 250,000 mph). Galactic collisions aren't that bad anyway. They'll just merge to become a larger galaxy - since it's mostly empty space.
This is what the sky will look like when that happens.
Shame that we won't be around to see it.
How about another weird factoid?Amazing simulation. Hard to believe we would be ok after going through that but I guess it makes sense.
http://www.physics.org/featuredetail.asp?id=41You could fit the entire human race in the volume of a sugar cube
This is because matter is incredibly, mind-bogglingly empty. An atom is like a miniature Solar System, with a tight nucleus playing the role of a Sun orbited by electrons like planets. But the nucleus is incredibly tiny compared with the orbits of the electrons. Tom Stoppard, the playwright, had the best image. He said, if the nucleus is like the altar of St Paul's cathedral, an electron is like a moth in the cathedral, one moment by the altar, the next by the dome. Imagine squeezing all the space out of an atom. Well, if you did that to all the atoms in all the people in the world, you could indeed fit the entire human race in the volume of a sugar cube.
No. It's ~350 million light-years away from Earth, and not hurtling in our direction. But we will be 'swallowed' by Andromeda in ~3.8 billion years (approaching us at 250,000 mph). Galactic collisions aren't that bad anyway. They'll just merge to become a larger galaxy - since it's mostly empty space.
Pretty cool. Once they 'touch', how long does the rest of that take?
Computer simulations derived from Hubble's data show that it will take an additional two billion years after the encounter for the interacting galaxies to completely merge under the tug of gravity and reshape into a single elliptical galaxy similar to the kind commonly seen in the local universe.
http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2012/31may_andromeda/
Bloody hellHow about another weird factoid?
Humans are 99% empty space too.
http://www.physics.org/featuredetail.asp?id=41
And atoms are 99.99999% empty space.
Who's we?
Yeah, let's go there. Or, enjoy the thread.
PEDANTIC CLARIFICATION: The large number of people around the world think we, as debatably-intelligent life, are some unique creature that exists here and here only.
So "some people" rather than "we"
Interestingly, it seems 52% of Brits and 54% of Americans believe in some form of alien life. But I'd still call it a majority when including all the various strands of religion and their belief in "uniqueness"
http://europe.newsweek.com/most-people-believe-intelligent-aliens-exist-333839?rm=eu
http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2012/31may_andromeda/
There's a theory that suggests IC 1101 is also an intermediary phase of a galactic collision, and is whipping itself into form - hence the unusually large amount of apparent mass - as observed by us.
People are stupid.
MARCH 3, 2016: NASA's Hubble Space Telescope is an amazing time machine; by looking back through space, astronomers actually look back through time. Now, by pushing Hubble to its limits, an international team of astronomers has shattered the cosmic distance record by viewing the farthest galaxy ever seen. Named GN-z11, this surprisingly bright, infant galaxy is seen as it was 13.4 billion years in the past. The astronomers saw it as it existed just 400 million years after the big bang, when the universe was only three percent of its current age. At a spectroscopically confirmed redshift of 11.1, the galaxy is even farther away than originally thought. It existed only 200 million to 300 million years after the time when scientists believe the very first stars started to form. At a billion solar masses, it is producing stars surprisingly quickly for such an early time. This new record will most likely stand until the launch of Hubble's successor, the James Webb Space Telescope, which will look even deeper into the universe for early galaxies.
I got to tell my wife she's not as big as she thinksHow about another weird factoid?
Humans are 99% empty space too.
http://www.physics.org/featuredetail.asp?id=41
And atoms are 99.99999% empty space.
Let me guess..politicians decided to go for and didn't give 2 shits about the engineersReally sad story about the Challenger disaster. I didn't know that 4 engineers predicted it was going to blow up, and as much as they begged for the launch to be stopped, no one listened
http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-...enger-shuttle-engineer-shed-30-years-of-guilt
Really sad story about the Challenger disaster. I didn't know that 4 engineers predicted it was going to blow up, and as much as they begged for the launch to be stopped, no one listened
http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-...enger-shuttle-engineer-shed-30-years-of-guilt
Magnitude 1 | Energy released = 1.995262e+6 Joules = 4.768791e-4 tons of TNT.
In December 2004, the magnetar SGR 1806-20 underwent such a starquake. In one-tenth of a second the subsequent blast released something like 2 times 1046 ergs of energy — equal to about 50 trillion times the Sun’s output during that same period. The quake, which occurred 50,000 light years from Earth, released gamma rays equivalent to 1037 kW in intensity.
“It looks like we have a structure that is bigger than anything else: like two Sloan Great Wall scale structures right next to each other,” said Heidi Lietzen of the Institute of Astrophysics at the University of La Laguna in Spain, who was the lead author of the new study. “The question now is: is it too big for our cosmological theories?”
http://phys.org/news/2016-03-horizons-imagery-reveals-small-frozen.html#jCpNew Horizons imagery reveals small, frozen lake on Pluto
March 28, 2016
NASA's New Horizons spacecraft spied several features on Pluto that offer evidence of a time millions or billions of years ago when – thanks to much higher pressure in Pluto's atmosphere and warmer conditions on the surface – liquids might have flowed across and pooled on the surface of the distant world.
"In addition to this possible former lake, we also see evidence of channels that may also have carried liquids in Pluto's past," said Alan Stern, Southwest Research Institute, Boulder, Colorado—principal investigator of New Horizons and lead author of the scientific paper.
This feature appears to be a frozen, former lake of liquid nitrogen, located in a mountain range just north of Pluto's informally named Sputnik Planum. Captured by the New Horizons' Long Range Reconnaissance Imager (LORRI) as the spacecraft flew past Pluto on July 14, 2015, the image shows details as small as about 430 feet (130 meters). At its widest point the possible lake appears to be about 20 miles (30 kilometers) across.