Zlatattack
New Member
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2017
- Messages
- 7,374
ooh really looking foward to this.
Guessing this isn’t available on Xbox?Looking into Uplay + on PC. This on the new Watch Dogs for a £12 monthly fee? seems like a great deal, I wont need more than a month.
For anyone wondering/worrying about map size.
The departure from the traditional AC style never bothered me. Let's face it, we all have short memory here because from my recollection people were fatigued by the mechanics which had run all the way through to Syndicate from AC1. Also, from a chronological standpoint it even makes sense to have a departure from Creed mechanics since we're talking about a pre-Creed world where that kind of training and heritage didn't exist, so the combat style reflected that better in an ancient world. Now we have Valhalla and AC Creed mechanics are being interwoven back in, which makes sense since the Creed itself is brought back into the contemporary period of the game's setting.
Looking into Uplay + on PC. This on the new Watch Dogs for a £12 monthly fee? seems like a great deal, I wont need more than a month.
I need something to play for the next month or so until we (hopefully?) get Cyberpunk so I’ll probably pick this up. Reviews look promising, but I’ve gone into every recent AC game expecting a 7.5/10 and not been disappointed, really. They certainly have their flaws, but they do some things fantastically that gets pushed to the side a little.
I wanted to reply on this. IMO Unity was the best Assassin's Creed formula we have got for ages and it provided the needed changes while preserving the core and main identity of the series. Changing assassination missions to a big sandbox area with multiple routes and ways and special opportunities to eliminate the target give the game a very strong "Hitman" feeling and suited the series so well. The rest of the missions were like usual Assassin's Creed but longer and bigger. They reduced missions in sequences to 2 or 3 at best but all long enough, and the last one is always the big sandbox assassination mission. Beside, the city were very alive. Not just that there were ton of people in street, but you can also enter the majority of the building, and many windows were open and leading to interior rooms with secrets to explore. It was crazy. There was no RPG and levels bullshit and the game didn't need them to feel unique change while preserving the main identity.
Unfortunately, the game flopped miserably just because it was a technical mess. Everyone and his dog focused on the technical problems, glitches, bugs and frame drops, and gave the game crap rating. Thus Ubisoft decided this one didn't work and through all of its ideas out of the window. Syndicate was a very watered down version of Unity, then the full complete change to a Witcher clone, instead of what Unity tried to do by making it closer to Hitman.
The series should have built on what was developed in Unity but as I said, technical problems fecked the game up and then Ubisoft decided to go 180 degrees and change everything.
It's really my biggest regret about this series.
Some YouTuber was showing tours of Ancient Greece via AC and it was impressive, at least as far as I could tell.Honestly, I'm just a history geek and I get a lot out of every Assassin's Creed game. I don't think people realise just how much historical input Ubisoft get from top-tier historians before creating their games. You'd be remiss for not appreciating it if you didn't know much about that particular era and location, but roaming the map is a hugely enjoyable thing for me.
Honestly, I'm just a history geek and I get a lot out of every Assassin's Creed game. I don't think people realise just how much historical input Ubisoft get from top-tier historians before creating their games. You'd be remiss for not appreciating it if you didn't know much about that particular era and location, but roaming the map is a hugely enjoyable thing for me.
The maps are great, yeah. Just idyllic and vibrant — Mykonos, Lakonia, Sparta etc in Odyssey; Alexandria, Giza, The Hippodrome in Origins... Gorgeous.Honestly, I'm just a history geek and I get a lot out of every Assassin's Creed game. I don't think people realise just how much historical input Ubisoft get from top-tier historians before creating their games. You'd be remiss for not appreciating it if you didn't know much about that particular era and location, but roaming the map is a hugely enjoyable thing for me.
Have read that the combat is weak. As expected from Ubisoft.
Yeah I miss the old style. Ezio and the AC3 fella. Black flag is where it started to go downhill as an assassins storyline. I feel like I’m the only one the liked the Animus outside world story as well.I'll retract my previous statement that it's underwhelming.
It's actually a good game.
The problem for me is that it's just not Assassin's Creed.
Origins, Odyssey and so on are good games.
But they're not what Ubisoft originally gave us with the AC series. Which is actually why I don't play it anymore.
I liked Desmond's story because it felt like there was a substance to it.Yeah I miss the old style. Ezio and the AC3 fella. Black flag is where it started to go downhill as an assassins storyline. I feel like I’m the only one the liked the Animus outside world story as well.
Have read that the combat is weak. As expected from Ubisoft.
It’s fine. Not as good as odyssey but It’s not an issue.
I’m enjoying it so far I’ve played about 3 hours.
yeah the shouldn't have sacked the guy who made the story in the first place because he wanted to end it at AC3 I think. It was the most interesting. Gods going to destroy the world and such. Though it's making me mad that they keep putting in the animus story with very little movement. Just dont put it in and continue with the different era without the animus stuff. Its become pointless.I liked Desmond's story because it felt like there was a substance to it.
When he died, I was like wtf, okay, where are they going with this?
Apparently Ubisoft didn't know where they were going with it either.
I would say definitely, if you're getting the ps5 right away... no point in playing the lower quality version for 2-3 days when the game will likely take 100+ hours to beat and the ps5 is our on Thursday.Is it worth waiting for the PS5 version for this?
One day they'll do a proper remake (not another remaster) of the Ezio trilogy. The gold standard of the series.
Has any AC game had satisfying combat? I remember the early games being especially bad. Felt like you were hitting enemies with twigs. The only thing that was satisfying was the hidden blade kills.Have read that the combat is weak. As expected from Ubisoft.
For most of us, we have to wait another seven days on top of that.I would say definitely, if you're getting the ps5 right away... no point in playing the lower quality version for 2-3 days when the game will likely take 100+ hours to beat and the ps5 is our on Thursday.
They'd have to do some serious work on AC:1... even at the time people said it was a very repetitive game.
2 and 3 were class though.
I would say definitely, if you're getting the ps5 right away... no point in playing the lower quality version for 2-3 days when the game will likely take 100+ hours to beat and the ps5 is our on Thursday.
Ouf. Well... either way, the last few assassins creed games took more than a couple of weeks to get through! And I bet that it'll be worth it to wait for the PS5 to play it rather than starting over.For most of us, we have to wait another seven days on top of that.
Rough. No estimate at all? Then I guess it would depend on what other games you have to go through and how much time you'll have. Not sure if its anything other than feeling smoother/sharper graphics on the ps5, so I'm sure it'll still be good on the ps4.Well I contacted the store where I made I pre-order and they said they don't know when they will have ps5 on stock, so I don't know when I will be getting one.
Honestly, I'm just a history geek and I get a lot out of every Assassin's Creed game. I don't think people realise just how much historical input Ubisoft get from top-tier historians before creating their games. You'd be remiss for not appreciating it if you didn't know much about that particular era and location, but roaming the map is a hugely enjoyable thing for me.
People wanting remakes / remasters will soon realise the games are quite poor compared to today's games. A lot of games have borrowed from AC and improved upon them.
At the time AC and AC2 were ace, because they done new things, or things were done in a way we hadn't seen before. Now it's all just a bit samey.
Nostalgia effect.
AC was my most anticipated game leading upto the run up for the PS3, I watched endless videos waiting for it. However I doubt i would be excited to replay it again.