Arse FAM TV

Not like it used to be is it? Only Robbie and Ty left from when it was good.

I liked Claude, could see how much football meant to him and it would really get to him when Arsenal weren't doing well. He seemed real. I didn't know he suffered with depression until after the fact, but it sort of made sense when I found out if that sounds right? He got sacked of course, and has since passed away.

DT was a dick but was entertaining. Sacked too.

Troopz went off to do his own thing didn't he?

There was another one who died, only a part-timer but he was entertaining from the early days. Heavy D.

Moh and Lee Gunner not it anymore either I think?

The whole thing is a bit uncomfortable when you think about some of the clearly unstable characters on there that have been thrust onto media to entertain people.
That other Lee is seriously worrying with his angry outbursts and Ty is clearly not right.
 
Jesus over Vinny :lol: :lol: Ben white
These are the type of people that make fans hate Arsenal. The irony is the same fans will then say you can't blame Arteta because we're playing against teams like Madrid/Bayern. So which one is it ? the players aren't good enough or the manager ?
 
The whole thing is a bit uncomfortable when you think about some of the clearly unstable characters on there that have been thrust onto media to entertain people.
That other Lee is seriously worrying with his angry outbursts and Ty is clearly not right.
Agree about Ty but I think calling Lee Judges seriously worrying is a bit over the top.
 
The whole thing is a bit uncomfortable when you think about some of the clearly unstable characters on there that have been thrust onto media to entertain people.
That other Lee is seriously worrying with his angry outbursts and Ty is clearly not right.

:lol:

In fairness, Ty has been like that since the very beginning.
 
The problem is, the only people who will genuinely react like Ty, Claude and DT are people who are damaged like Claude, DT and TY.

Troops is, and always was an actor. It become very obvious during his time in the US, its performative nonsense. The people on aftv now are relatively sane, normal people, which is why its boring.
 
I for one am shocked DT would have views like that, always seemed a very progressive, switched on, intelligent chap.

It's unclear whether your shock is genuine or sarcastic, but are you suggesting that people with differing views from you are less progressive and less intelligent?
 
Do you agree with him?

It's unclear whether your shock is genuine or sarcastic, but are you suggesting that people with differing views from you are less progressive and less intelligent?

Depends on the differing views, obviously. All differing views? Of course not. I'm not a genius or an expert in all fields of life :)

I do think MrDT is less intelligent than me though, if you find him quite wise, that's your perspective you're entitled to.
 
Do you agree with him?



Depends on the differing views, obviously. All differing views? Of course not. I'm not a genius or an expert in all fields of life :)

I do think MrDT is less intelligent than me though, if you find him quite wise, that's your perspective you're entitled to.

Whether I agree with him or not is irrelevant. I found your comment very patronising, implying that anyone with a different view is unintelligent.

However, let's assume you're an expert on the subject DT was referring to. I have a few questions:

Did you watch the opening ceremony? If so, did you notice any mocking of Christianity or, as DT put it, "a man pretending to be a woman"?

What specific parts of DT's statement do you disagree with, and why?

How do you measure intelligence?
 
Whether I agree with him or not is irrelevant. I found your comment very patronising, implying that anyone with a different view is unintelligent.

However, let's assume you're an expert on the subject DT was referring to. I have a few questions:

Did you watch the opening ceremony? If so, did you notice any mocking of Christianity or, as DT put it, "a man pretending to be a woman"?

What specific parts of DT's statement do you disagree with, and why?

How do you measure intelligence?

:lol: bless you, but I've got zero interest in this conversation. I said what I wanted to say. If you think it's patronising to think that awful human being is unintelligent, again bless you. Take care.
 
I for one am shocked DT would have views like that, always seemed a very progressive, switched on, intelligent chap.

Not that I disagree with you, but it's funny seeing Judas respond to a post about the Olympics parodying the Last Supper.

"One of you will betray me this night...."

:lol:
 
Whether I agree with him or not is irrelevant. I found your comment very patronising, implying that anyone with a different view is unintelligent.

However, let's assume you're an expert on the subject DT was referring to. I have a few questions:

Did you watch the opening ceremony? If so, did you notice any mocking of Christianity or, as DT put it, "a man pretending to be a woman"?

What specific parts of DT's statement do you disagree with, and why?

How do you measure intelligence?

I'm not sure if you're serious or not but the tweets by DT are classic Tommy Robinson style anti-Islam / transphobic content where they stand up on behalf of Christians without (in the case of DT at least) being Christian themselves. It's a weird persona they like to take on board.

I think it's pretty safe and understandable for people to believe or think that they're of low intelligence.

Especially as DT has video evidence and criminal evidence of him being a thick twat.
 
People are so damn precious. There was nothing offensive about that opening ceremony - and if there was, just turn off the tv.
 
:lol: bless you, but I've got zero interest in this conversation. I said what I wanted to say. If you think it's patronising to think that awful human being is unintelligent, again bless you. Take care.

That's a shame.

I always thought you seemed a very progressive, switched on, intelligent chap.
 
I'm not sure if you're serious or not but the tweets by DT are classic Tommy Robinson style anti-Islam / transphobic content where they stand up on behalf of Christians without (in the case of DT at least) being Christian themselves. It's a weird persona they like to take on board.

I think it's pretty safe and understandable for people to believe or think that they're of low intelligence.

Especially as DT has video evidence and criminal evidence of him being a thick twat.

Serious about what? I haven't shared any views on this matter, nor do I intend to.

I don't follow DT, so I don't see the content he posts on X.

I was simply responding to Judas' comment.
 
I'm not sure if you're serious or not but the tweets by DT are classic Tommy Robinson style anti-Islam / transphobic content where they stand up on behalf of Christians without (in the case of DT at least) being Christian themselves. It's a weird persona they like to take on board.

I think it's pretty safe and understandable for people to believe or think that they're of low intelligence.

Especially as DT has video evidence and criminal evidence of him being a thick twat.

I know, right?

What the feck does DT know about infralapsarianism or hermeneutics? :cool:
 
I'm not sure if you're serious or not but the tweets by DT are classic Tommy Robinson style anti-Islam / transphobic content where they stand up on behalf of Christians without (in the case of DT at least) being Christian themselves. It's a weird persona they like to take on board.

I think it's pretty safe and understandable for people to believe or think that they're of low intelligence.

Especially as DT has video evidence and criminal evidence of him being a thick twat.
They're probably mates.
 
It's unclear whether your shock is genuine or sarcastic, but are you suggesting that people with differing views from you are less progressive and less intelligent?
This is clearly not what he's suggesting. This seems like a bad faith interpretation of his comment.