Drifter
American
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2004
- Messages
- 68,571
Yep that's your lot.Till the January sales where hopes of transfer junkies will be raised and dashed.
We need one of those RAWK-type word filters, so that 'deadwood' automatically becomes 'Jedward'.
Surplus to requirements? Out of favour? Unlikely to be involved? Up for sale? Available for transfer? No longer in Fergie's plans? Down the pecking order?
Does that work?
Steve, as much as I like ya - leave the National Treasure that is Jedward, the feck alone
First-teamly Challenged?
Footballers of non-united quality?
Members of the Emile Heskey appreciation society?
Sorry, mate. This one's for you:
First-teamly Challenged?
Footballers of non-united quality?
Members of the Emile Heskey appreciation society?
What? Gibson's hardly going to contribute this season and is'nt in Ferguson's plans? Its a new look United side he's built.
Yes, he maybe surplus to requirements. But to call him 'deadwood' is very disrespectful. He has scored some big goals for us i.e. Bayern at home. Yes we mightn't have gone through but at the time that was a huge goal.
Nah. The goal is always the same size mate. Its part of the rules of football
WTF - a German with a sense of humour
Unusual I know. However Im a mancunian
So, the Sneijder and Nasri interest.....all invented by the media? Remarkable.We've been done since De Gea officially signed. Fergie clearly doesn't agree with most of us as relates to our midfield.
So, the Sneijder and Nasri interest.....all invented by the media? Remarkable.
You talking to yourself again Rams?
Its not good for ya mate, its silly season I know but you're better than this. Snap out of it dude
Very well could be because like all of us outside looking in, the assumption we've made is we need certain types of players for this coming season and just gone with it. It all started with our dismantling against Barca and Scholes retirement shortly thereafter and from there it was all assumed that United will be buying a replacement for him.
Sneijder has stated that he has spoken to us unofficially. Nasri said we made him an offer.
Unofficially? That means we must be genuinely interested in probably 100 players each window. Sneijder says he talks to a lot of people and am sure he might even have spoken to someone that is in some way connected to United that asked him "Hey would you move to United if they came for you?" - that's probably the extent of a unofficial conversation.
As for Nasri? Thought the latest was none of his first choices came for him so he settled for City - I don't recall him ever coming out and saying that United gave him offer anyway. When was that?
How would you like to refer to players who are no longer required?
Well this transfer window has been a massive anti-climax.
I expected AT LEAST two from Sanchez, Aguero, Sneidjer, Nasri, Pastore, Goetze, M'Villa, Hazard.
For the body language experts among you, here's a video of the David Gill interview on SSN:
Gill - Fergie will be happy | Manchester United News, Fixtures, Results, Transfers | Sky Sports
Except that is just you making a load of stuff up. The fact is, he has stated that he has spoken to us unofficially with regard to a potential transfer. We have also been linked with him practically every day for weeks, in the media here, Holland, and Italy. Are they all making it up? Highly unlikely.
I read it yesterday. That he had an offer from both us and Shitty. Shitty's was considerably higher.
Regardless, my point remains. We were not "done" with transfers once we signed De Gea. We have obviously been after players but, unfortunately, they haven't come off.
By no means an expert but to me it sounded very much like he meant "no more transfers".For the body language experts among you, here's a video of the David Gill interview on SSN:
Gill - Fergie will be happy | Manchester United News, Fixtures, Results, Transfers | Sky Sports