I have doubts regarding Solskjaer, and always thought we'd "paint ourselves into a corner" if we let Ole anywhere near the manager's office, even in a provisional capacity, because the clamour would inevitably become too great not to appoint him, with all the Sir Alex & "class of 92" connotations; and of late ( 7 defeats in 9, etc ) my worries seemed warranted, but I thought he did well last night to address some of the tangible problems that seemed to elude him in other games: he got the players to actually put a shift in, especially in the first half, and got some measure of parity where tactics were concerned, and had Lingard not fluffed his lines and DDG not got a very obvious attack of the screaming ab-dabs, we might have gone on to get something out of the game.
What City did when Sane came on, I feel, took much of the responsibility out of the manager's hands because we really don't have the requisite quality, player-wise, or mental tenacity, needed to compete with that type of dynamic play. Ole has made mistakes, and will continue to do so, but with a comprehensive, and, I'm afraid, protracted, overhaul, I feel confident we'll get where we need to be, but we've got to bite on the bitter pill and look at the at the Everton display as the nadir, or "ground-zero" moment, because that was the utter shite performance that should catalyze any self-respecting professional to knuckle down and follow instruction. Well, I say that should be the case, but given the pestiferous nature of our dressingroom and for that matter, our boardroom, who knows what the eventual outcome will be?