Kill 'em all
Pastor of Muppets
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2012
- Messages
- 10,548
We will probably walk away, he stays on strike or downs his tools, come back in January and sign him for 30m.
If he might come, what is Ajax’s aim? To get more money? I thought the word is they don’t want to sell?I now have, they haven't gone back on their word. Your point is still incorrect. He might come but Ajax are playing this perfectly.
Did they agree that he could leave? If not then they haven't gone back on their word, surely that's obvious.Clearly not, we hear it first hand he's told them he wants to leave twice, 4 months apart.
That was the discussion. He's posting his opinion, I'm saying it's biasedA discussion should be objective there Kim Jong
how the feck do I know according to Antony yes.Did they agree that he could leave? If not then they haven't gone back on their word, surely that's obvious.
Let's walk away from a player desperate to join United, and instead try to sign a player desperate to not join United. GeniusSpend this money on De Jong
It’s a no sense, give game time to Garnacho
You're on redcafe, not red and white cafe.Of course they are. People here disrespect Ajax every 3 posts, just because they won't let them have a new shiny toy. Not that hard to dislike those people.
In June of this year, I interrupted my vacation and came personally to inform the managers of Ajax, including new coach, about my wish to leave and that they should consider this possibility, because it was a project for two seasons.
Maybe, maybe not.It’s exactly how it works.
We are getting stitched up for not doing our business early.
Even with an unhappy player that is not playing or training, Ajax are still playing hardball.
Why? Because they are in the driving seat as they know we’re desperate.
I mean either they keep one of their best players or they get an even more overly inflated fee to compensate for losing him this late, 2 pretty good results for them I would suggest.If he might come, what is Ajax’s aim? To get more money? I thought the word is they don’t want to sell?
We can’t know they are playing it perfectly or not until we see what happens - will Ajax be better off than if they had accepted the large bid?
Conversely, if their own scouts had thought he had no quality, would they have offered him a five year contract. Why don’t they just offer a 2 year deal then if they thought he might be shit.
Of course they’re entitled to keep him but they’re doing nothing but damaging their own brand in the eyes of future starlets that see Ajax as a stepping stone to the bigger leagues. I’m sure agents will be calling Ajax to insert release clauses into their client’s contracts if it’s clear the club won’t honor its promises. It was Ajax who set the price, a price that United have matched multiple times only to be told a new price each time. And it’s not even like United are lowballing Ajax either; it’s a record price for the league and far exceeds his market value.
Wouldn't be surprised to see us push for Gakpo instead now. I don't see us going above what we offered, would be very surprising, already a ridiculous offer. No chance Ajax gets as much for him next summer, but he'll still fetch a good fee.
It's a more than fair price in your opinion.It's not really entitlement I think. Imo 80m is more than a fair price. We didn't keep Ronaldo against his will. Of course Ajax could do whatever they want but imo it's not really nice nor right to keep a player against his will when the offer is fair.
According to him where? He said he told them he wanted to leave, I don't see where he's said that was approved. You're the one who said they went back on their word, now you have no idea.how the feck do I know according to Antony yes.
Blaming Ajax is silly. Our ire should be directed at our useless DoF and CEO. How come it's our club at the centre of these sagas so often? Boring.
Haven't met the required price? It's the largest ever fee for an Eredivise player! It's clear what's happening here, and it's not about the offer on the table.
This will change things going forward re: their recruitment abroad. Look at what Haaland did with Dortmund, insisting on a release clause when he signed that contract. I wouldn't be surprised if Bellingham's done the same, but someone please check. The difference with Haaland is that he was a top-rated talent, and so a price could be set beforehand that would seem reasonable. What about an unknown South American with a potentially high ceiling? How would his agents protect his prospects?
I mean either they keep one of their best players or they get an even more overly inflated fee to compensate for losing him this late, 2 pretty good results for them I would suggest.
Who says they need months? Even then Antony is clearly saying he told them back in February that he wanted to leave.Because they wouldn't be 3 weeks into a season and they'd have months and months to replace him, rather than a few days.
No one truly believes that we offered over 90m Euros on day 1 of the transfer window then he'd still be an Ajax player. We were slow and ponderous yet again.
It amazes me after 10 years of this incompetence people are still desperate to defend the club.
Just because its a record fee doesn't make it the required price - even if we think its a more then generous offer.
I'm sure if we bid £150m they would accept. Ultimately its Ajax who set his worth to them and what they want to do this season.
Wouldn't be surprised to see us push for Gakpo instead now. I don't see us going above what we offered, would be very surprising, already a ridiculous offer. No chance Ajax gets as much for him next summer, but he'll still fetch a good fee.
Haaland also wanted a release clause when Man Utd were trying to purchase him and from all reports seems to have a couple in his Man City contract too.
Some of you have your heads in the clouds to think that a teen South American who isn't a Neymar like talent will turn their nose up at going to Ajax in the future, undoubtedly one of the best clubs in Europe to be a young player.
It's also incredibly churlish to think long contracts only protect clubs. Yeah it's great for Ajax that Anthony fulfilled his potential. What if he didn't, as so many don't? He'd be sitting pretty, on a salary far higher than any he'd get in Brazil and going nowhere most likely unless another club offered a similar salary or Ajax agreed to subsidise his salary.
It goes both ways.
No player has ever been valued more in Holland and its not as if he's the greatest player to ever step foot in the Eredivisie. The offers rejected have been absolutely more than fair
Are you being stupid on purpose? Antony clearly states they had an agreement which is why he's so angry.According to him where? He said he told them he wanted to leave, I don't see where he's said that was approved. You're the one who said they went back on their word, now you have no idea.
What a dickhead. Wanted the financial security of a 5-year deal should he flop in Europe, and was too scared to bet on himself by only signing a 2-year deal. Can't have it both ways.
I know, but i'm absolutely neutral on this deal. I don't want him to leave Ajax, but i also want him at Utd. So i can now finally see how both sides react and it's not looking great for the Utd Side, it's full of petulant children that throw away any logic because all they think is that Ajax is a very small club that shouldn't be able to refuse bids this high, even though Ajax is very rich and can reject it with ease.You're on redcafe, not red and white cafe.
this thread is full of petulant children who believe every bit of information that is in their favour. You think that everything Antony's team is now saying is the truth? Of course not, he's trying to force a move, so they'll say everything they think will help their case. If Utd payed up instantly this wouldn't be a problem. Ajax has been clear from the start that they won't negotiate, it's asking price or get out.
He doesn'tAre you being stupid on purpose? Antony clearly states they had an agreement which is why he's so angry.
How else are we supposed to know the situation
Yeah I'm sure he was also having Ajax' financials in mind back then. That might be how clubs think, but players don't give a feck.Or he signed a longer contract so he will have a higher transfer value which benefits the clubs who gave him the opportunity. Especially given the sell on clause for Sao Paulo
Some people are still romantics.
No player has ever been valued more in Holland and its not as if he's the greatest player to ever step foot in the Eredivisie. The offers rejected have been absolutely more than fair
Haven't met the required price? It's the largest ever fee for an Eredivise player! It's clear what's happening here, and it's not about the offer on the table.
You missed the point about the 2 years, I'm saying neither side can decide a 5 year contract is not just tgat. Their brand can only be strengthened by this stand off. Ask a non united supporter.
We've always known he is a cnut, but there is no problem if he's on your sideAt least he's consistent about being a cnut. Who knows, Ajacieden may come to share my opinion of him after all
If only he was the top target when they were wasting 3 months on FDJ, ultimately that's whos fault it is when he didn't want to leave, Ajax are only doing what is best for them.
Yeah I'm sure he was also having Ajax' financials in mind back then. That might be how clubs think, but players don't give a feck.
Why would he even mention the 2 year project and asking them to leave twice if he didn't?He doesn't
What a dickhead. Wanted the financial security of a 5-year deal should he flop in Europe, and was too scared to bet on himself by only signing a 2-year deal. Can't have it both ways.