That's the one we need most of all.
Agreed, the weigl purchase is as important as Griezmann imo.
@Acquire Me said we are in for him.
Weigl, Griezmann, Silva and a CB would be the best transfer window ever
That's the one we need most of all.
Of course. Every year it's the same story. About time we start making the most of our resources.If we are not playing well and winning, you can be sure all those players will again be suddenly useless and in need of an "upgrade".
Basically sounds like he will sign if we win the EL
I'm not anti greizmann but where will that leave Rashford?
Martial Greizmann Rashford
Lingard/Mikhataryan
Pogba Herrera
??
Agreed, the weigl purchase is as important as Griezmann imo.
@Acquire Me said we are in for him.
Weigl, Griezmann, Silva and a CB would be the best transfer window ever
It...It? ....and he will go
Agreed, the weigl purchase is as important as Griezmann imo.
@Acquire Me said we are in for him.
Weigl, Griezmann, Silva and a CB would be the best transfer window ever
We aren't even linked with Weigl. Where are these rumors coming from?
Rashford is not the one you should be worried about.
Won't be surprised if Martial will be a bench warmer next season if he's not sold in the summer.
Bet he's changed his mind after Weigl broke his ankle though. Out for the whole transfer window.Our resident ITK @Acquire Me called it.
Hazard revealing on Twitter ?Its great news, but this is the sort of thing that made chelsea step back, he needs to stop talking to the media, clubs don't like the players who constantly disclose everything to the media.
Players should Join if we win or lose. I mean if Greizman is so good he can come if we lose and get us in the champions league. Seems odd to judge a move based on what happened last season.
Wonderful news. Jose is building something. With the french squad in our team, I see it as possible that other french players join also (Varane, Dembele).
Rashford is not the one you should be worried about.
Won't be surprised if Martial will be a bench warmer next season if he's not sold in the summer.
yep. I think it's winning the EL and the transfer ban being lifted so they can replace him = Griezmann joins MUFC.
If we meet the release clause there's not a great deal they can do, replacement ready or not.
Immediately after the 2016 Euros, Manchester United were linked with Antoine Griezmann.
I couldn't believe it. First Pogba, and then Griezmann! My pulse quickened as I imagined this happening. This was the stuff of dreams. I contemplated lowering my zipper and sneaking one off while on the train, but no! I would wait until I was home and my girlfriend asleep or perhaps to wait when this tranfer happened.
I'm glad I waited as time has given me a clearer perspective. Almost a year after that rumour started, my excitement is gone. Like the morning after a wet dream, I want to recreate that feeling of euphoria but it is permanently lost. I've moved on. Then it was Griezmann, but now, right now and finally, Lacazette is the only one for me.
Lacazette is cut from the same cloth as the top strikers at the top European clubs. His profile is somewhere in the class of Lewandowski, Benzema and Louis Saha. Yes - you read that right. But I will come back to this.
These group of strikers are first and foremost "number 9s". They score goals. May I point out that the debate on wether Griezmann is a striker in the hole or a wide forward is not one that Manchester United can afford the time to find out.
When the new season kicks off, we want to have round pegs in round holes. See the debate on wether Pogba is a number 10 or 8, or if he can play in a 2-man midfield.
Quite frankly, I believe Manchester United should tailor their recruitment to their actual footballing needs - goals, and should avoid signing a posterboy for marketing.
For those who dont know, Lacazette has scored 31 league goals this season compared to 17 from Griezmann, and in less appearances too. Even concerning is that Griezmann rarely scores more than 1 goal a game. Do Manchester United really want to play out more 1-1 or 1-0 results?
Considering that Lacazette is a year younger and valued somewhere around the £45 million mark, while Griezmann would cost £80 million, signing Lacazette is a no brainer.
Remember United's last number 9 of Guadeloupian origin? Louis Saha. There is a similarity in his style that Lacazette has. The ability to play in a packed box, hold-up play, tidy dribbles, Power and simple layoffs - some of these qualities are the main staples of the likes of Lewandoski and Benzema.
I fervently hope that we avoid what I believe is a mistake by signing Griezmann instead of Lacazette. Our club needs to go back to getting the best bang out of the same buck.
Signing Lacazette instead of Griezmann gives us a striker who fits better, the football style the club thrived on. Finally, of the players such as Bellotti, Griezmann and Lukaku, we've been linked to, Lacazette has the lowest price but the most league goals scored. Bargain or not?
We heard this sort of thing before we signed Pogba. Fact of the matter is if we want to even get close to the likes of Real and Barca we need to bring in players of the very highest level. Griezmann will bring a lot more to the team than just goals.Immediately after the 2016 Euros, Manchester United were linked with Antoine Griezmann.
I couldn't believe it. First Pogba, and then Griezmann! My pulse quickened as I imagined this happening. This was the stuff of dreams. I contemplated lowering my zipper and sneaking one off while on the train, but no! I would wait until I was home and my girlfriend asleep or perhaps to wait when this tranfer happened.
I'm glad I waited as time has given me a clearer perspective. Almost a year after that rumour started, my excitement is gone. Like the morning after a wet dream, I want to recreate that feeling of euphoria but it is permanently lost. I've moved on. Then it was Griezmann, but now, right now and finally, Lacazette is the only one for me.
Lacazette is cut from the same cloth as the top strikers at the top European clubs. His profile is somewhere in the class of Lewandowski, Benzema and Louis Saha. Yes - you read that right. But I will come back to this.
These group of strikers are first and foremost "number 9s". They score goals. May I point out that the debate on wether Griezmann is a striker in the hole or a wide forward is not one that Manchester United can afford the time to find out.
When the new season kicks off, we want to have round pegs in round holes. See the debate on wether Pogba is a number 10 or 8, or if he can play in a 2-man midfield.
Quite frankly, I believe Manchester United should tailor their recruitment to their actual footballing needs - goals, and should avoid signing a posterboy for marketing.
For those who dont know, Lacazette has scored 31 league goals this season compared to 17 from Griezmann, and in less appearances too. Even concerning is that Griezmann rarely scores more than 1 goal a game. Do Manchester United really want to play out more 1-1 or 1-0 results?
Considering that Lacazette is a year younger and valued somewhere around the £45 million mark, while Griezmann would cost £80 million, signing Lacazette is a no brainer.
Remember United's last number 9 of Guadeloupian origin? Louis Saha. There is a similarity in his style that Lacazette has. The ability to play in a packed box, hold-up play, tidy dribbles, Power and simple layoffs - some of these qualities are the main staples of the likes of Lewandoski and Benzema.
I fervently hope that we avoid what I believe is a mistake by signing Griezmann instead of Lacazette. Our club needs to go back to getting the best bang out of the same buck.
Signing Lacazette instead of Griezmann gives us a striker who fits better, the football style the club thrived on. Finally, of the players such as Bellotti, Griezmann and Lukaku, we've been linked to, Lacazette has the lowest price but the most league goals scored. Bargain or not?
6/10? That means he actually fancies himself to move to us... Securing Champions league and a good impression from Mourinho will be the swaying factors. Wednesday just keeps getting bigger and bigger. He clearly wants the move if that's the case, but is a 6/10 to cover himself if we don't make the CL. Very good news for us as fans.
The #7 beckons
In fairness, did Rojo not stop playing to force a move through to us?Well, Bernardo Sivla and Dier then.
He's an excellent player but I don't like these sort of characters. Hazard's entourage leaks Madrid speculations every season, remember his antics before signing for "UCL winners"? I don't want a Yaya at our club.
So he is 6/10 on joining us and 7/10 on remaining with Atletico. If we fix his maths by changing denominator to 13, we get 46% chance of joining us and 54% chance of remaining at Atletico.
But these probabilities will obviously change if we win Europa and qualify for Champions League. Someone need to borrow Essiens calculator so we can figure this thing out.
Hazard was a 21 year old wonderkid, he got a pass due to that, griezmann is a lot older and is a global star, could very well be our next no 7, everything he says will get a lot media time and unlike hazard he can't play the i am a young man card.Hazard revealing on Twitter ?
Sadly this is probably a message (indirectly from his agent) to encourage other clubs to increase/table offers.
Rating his chances at joining us as 6/10 is quite disrespectful as well IMO - clearly not high priority and effectively an option if a someone preferable doesn't come in. Obviously he can change this post Europa League final and say 10/10 whilst we have CL football but something about it irks me.
Sadly this is probably a message (indirectly from his agent) to encourage other clubs to increase/table offers.
Rating his chances at joining us as 6/10 is quite disrespectful as well IMO - clearly not high priority and effectively an option if a someone preferable doesn't come in. Obviously he can change this post Europa League final and say 10/10 whilst we have CL football but something about it irks me.