Greck
Full Member
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2016
- Messages
- 7,121
There isn't a single conventional belief in management that tells you to aim flip a long term asset for a short term asset unless in a state of desperation or short of choice. We should have moved Martial for a middle to longer term prospect not Perisic. No one is losing sleep over Perisic.No you don't. You trade good, driven players for better, more driven players. And tbh, the difference between players in a title winning team and those in a 6th place team is less technical ability and more mentality.
The very strawman I addressed is in that very quote so let me reiterate. Ole being shite doesn't vindicate Jose.What has ANY of our managers in the last decade "built", pray tell?
As much as I am not a fan of Jose - his thought process, at least, was clear. He wanted a culture in the team, of self-motivated and talented players. With Aldeweireld, he was getting an experienced, driven individual that can serve as an example for young players. Ditto with Perisic. He was trying to build a winning culture at the club - the importance of this must not be overlooked, especially in an organization that is otherwise content with top-4, and is prone to coddling its players.
If Jose recognized that Martial might go the Balotelli route of wasting his bags of talent - he is within his rights to move him on. That's the job of the manager. While not 19, Perisic was 26-27 when Jose wanted him - not some old fart. Oh, and we ultimately did stump up 80m for Maguire while denying Jose's request when we could've got him for half that.
You know damn well it wasn't "half that". The veto price was 60m which was also a fleece from Leicester. Maguire isn't a United CB and Jose was about to blow money. Martial failing also doesn't vindicate Jose who has himself gone on to fail at multiple clubs. If you want to retroactively justify anything from 5 years ago based on today's failure then congratulate the club not listening to him. No wonder Jose's career trajectory since then has closely mirrored Martial's, maybe even worse.
It's all subjective. Here's some more subjectivity. Perisic would have done little more. We're not talking about a world class player here. While Martial still had value it shouldn't have been perisic he got swapped for and we were right to part ways with Jose. Just because Martial deserves to be sold doesn't vindicate that Perisic deal.That is subjective, isn't it? However, with the benefit of hindsight, chances are high that Perisic would've been more productive over 5 years for us, than Martial has been. So very likely it would've been a good trade.