How about assessing this clip from a tactical perspective in order to understand Martial’s grievances?
What did Martial do wrong here apart from not sprint (which he has not done for years due to injuries)?
He approached Schar, he shadow pressed him by cutting off the passing lane back to both Pope and Lascelles. He did the right thing by forcing Schar into our crowded midfield. Rashford is the one who did not press Schar when the conditions were ripe to force a high turnover.
And yet Ten Hag is shouting at Martial, a far easier target than Carrington academy product and highest earner Rashford!
Martial has every right to be annoyed and argue back at the unfair criticism. He has every right to feel he is being targeted or scapegoated.
Ten Hag was cooked tactically by Eddie Howe, who correctly identified that United’s man-oriented press can be easily breached by ball carrying. A man-to-man press can only work if every individual presses with the same intensity. There’s a reason why it is not used by the top managers, and those who do use it, such as Bielsa, are prone to drubbings.
Furthermore, if Ten Hag’s system was going to be based on a high press, surely he would pick Antony and Hojlund, who are far better and more intense pressers than Martial and Rashford? The whole system for Newcastle away was confusing. He wanted a high-press from the front, and yet the back four was camped near its own box!
But of course Ten Hag avoids accountability and gets off scot-free once again. And then posters in this thread will point to Martial’s alleged attitude problems, and complain that he is giving backchat and when he should just shut up and accept Ten Hag’s rollickings lying down.
The sooner people start to assess the manager from a tactical perspective, the better. This is when you realise the extent to which he is failing these players, how incompetent he is and why he does not have the authority to adopt this disciplinarian approach of his.
Too many people believe that Ten Hag has an unconditional right to never be questioned or challenged. Why? What has he done to earn this respect? Who are your loyalities to? The club that has brought you immense happiness in your life or the manager who is dragging its prestige and dignity through the mud week-by-week by treating it like his personal dictatorship where he has a free reign to make baffling decision after baffling decisions without any check or balance on his abuses of power?