Bebestation
Im a doctor btw, my IQ destroys yours
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2019
- Messages
- 11,862
The only reason i'd keep him is it gives us / the front line an option of another creative striker alongside Kane which is not easy to find.
The only reason i'd keep him is it gives us / the front line an option of another creative striker alongside Kane which is not easy to find.
I dont rate Martial - but if we are bringing Kane to have Rashford playing like Son then Martial could do aswell as our back up plan b or even C. Until he leaves on a free because noone is buying him.Except is actually doesn't
No-one thinks what he gives is enough, I’m pretty sure of that. But some people haven’t deliberately forgotten his good periods. The start of this season until he got injured he had a run of games and played well, not just a few cameos. When Ole first came in he played well - that’s going back a bit but it’s within memory.That's not enough though.
He would come on for about 30 mins and look good then would get injured and miss months of football. And actually it has been years, he was awful in 20/21 and awful in 21/22. The only time in the last few years he's looked good was the start of this season and even that was only 4 or 5 cameos.
When did he last start a few games in a row and play really well? It's years ago. The rest of your post basically agrees with me anyway.
I dont rate Martial - but if we are bringing Kane to have Rashford playing like Son then Martial could do aswell as our back up plan b or even C. Until he leaves on a free because noone is buying him.
Yeah, we’ll end up keeping him because we’ll have no choice.I dont rate Martial - but if we are bringing Kane to have Rashford playing like Son then Martial could do aswell as our back up plan b or even C. Until he leaves on a free because noone is buying him.
Id say thats more a plan B than a plan C. As rashfords shown- he can cover as aCF & it wouldnt surprise me if certain players rearrived making martial even the plan D.A backup option needs to be available
No-one thinks what he gives is enough, I’m pretty sure of that. But some people haven’t deliberately forgotten his good periods. The start of this season until he got injured he had a run of games and played well, not just a few cameos. When Ole first came in he played well - that’s going back a bit but it’s within memory.
As you say, I’m mostly agreeing with you (and I’ll shed no tears when he leaves) but it’s not necessary to exaggerate how poor he has been. He’s very talented and but for injuries he would have achieved a lot. Most of his so-called poor performances stem from being unfit (not match fit that is) after injury.
Again, it’s barely worth saying “if he can get fit and stay injury free” because he is injured nearly all the time. We had the same thing with Jones. In the end, we just have to accept that some players are prone to injury and are unlikely to improve much in that regard.
Id say thats more a plan B than a plan C. As rashfords shown- he can cover as aCF & it wouldnt surprise me if certain players rearrived making martial even the plan D.
Yeah, can’t disagree with that.You're just proving my point.
The start of this season was just a few cameos, he got 45 minutes vs Liverpool, got injured, 30 mins vs City, 30 mins vs Omonia and started against Everton but had to come off after 29 minutes. And I said it's been years since Martial has been consistently starting games and playing well and you disagreed and point to Ole first coming in, which was over 4 years ago again proving my point.
Not sure why we're arguing when you seem to completely agree with me. He's been here 8 seasons and there have been times he's been very good, his first season was outstanding, he kept Mourinho in the job for a while in 18/19 and the empty stadium part of 19/20 he was very good too. But they are all a long time ago now.
He's been knackered for about 3 years now. He needs a long run of games to get sharp but he's never going to get that because he's so injury prone. We're stuck with him because of his high wages but he'll be off on a free after that I'm sure.
I obviously don't know what's going on behind the scenes but i've always thought Martial would probably stay and finish his contract here next season because a) who would buy him and pay those wages and b) we might be operating under some financial constraints which could mean that two strikers are unlikely.I dont rate Martial - but if we are bringing Kane to have Rashford playing like Son then Martial could do aswell as our back up plan b or even C. Until he leaves on a free because noone is buying him.
Yeah, can’t disagree with that.
I didn’t think we were arguing. I’ve just noticed the tendency for a lot of people to generalise and exaggerate to reinforce the point that we’re better off without him. I don’t disagree with the bottom line but his failings are all connected to his injuries. Some people want to convince everyone else that he is lazy and basically incapable, and in doing that they want to disregard his positive contributions.
He’s never been a favourite of mine either, by the way, but I can see why managers give him a chance, especially when you look at our options. I’m sure we’ll get a striker or two in the summer anyway. Bloody hope so.
He won't be here next season, quote me when the season starts
I would love to hear the logic behind this statement. We are paying him 250k a week and based on his form for the last 3 years nobody else is going to give him even 25k a week. Short of loaning him out for the year and agreeing to pay 95% of his wages there is no way he is leaving until his contract expires.
I would love to hear the logic behind this statement. We are paying him 250k a week and based on his form for the last 3 years nobody else is going to give him even 25k a week. Short of loaning him out for the year and agreeing to pay 95% of his wages there is no way he is leaving until his contract expires.
But his mobility’s been completely ruined by injuries. He has none of the speed or agility he had when he was younger which means he’s had to completely adapt his game. He still shows the occasional glimpse but it’s obvious he’ll never be able to move like he used to. We’ve seen it previously with loads of players; Torres, Owen, Falcao etc. Even his biggest haters can see how much injuries have affected his overall game so I don’t know why it should be ignored.Not really. There are plenty of players who’ve had horrible injury records but generally play pretty well when they’re not injured. Ledley King or Paul McGrath would be the classic examples. Louis Saha another, who plays the same position as Martial.
If it takes forever to reach any kind of decent level of performance then that’s a problem which is unrelated to injuries. Martial’s been fit and available for selection since the Newcastle game on April 2nd. Presumably in training for at least a week or two before that. We’re almost into June now. That’s more than enough time for any half decent player to shake off all their ring rust. Instead he’s looking as lethargic and heavy legged as the most overworked players in our squad. You just can’t put that all down to bad luck with injuries.
But his mobility’s been completely ruined by injuries. He has none of the speed or agility he had when he was younger which means he’s had to completely adapt his game. He still shows the occasional glimpse but it’s obvious he’ll never be able to move like he used to. We’ve seen it previously with loads of players; Torres, Owen, Falcao etc. Even his biggest haters can see how much injuries have affected his overall game so I don’t know why it should be ignored.
Get rid now. Why wait. We don't need passengers in this team if we are to challenge for anything.He will for sure stay. We need a main striker and will get one. He'll just be a backup for the year until he leaves on a free next summer.
But we’re talking about how injuries affected them, not how good they were. It’s disingenuous to pretend that age was the main factor for their drop off, particularly Torres and Owen who pretty much finished at 26, losing most of their mobility and constantly picking up niggling injuries. Jack Wilshere is another more recent example. It happens. That’s not to say he would have even been the level required but I don’t know why it’s so hard to acknowledge that he’s been heavily impaired by injuries. Reading your posts you’d think he’s been a non-entity his whole time here, not someone who’s scored nearly 100 goals for us. There’s a reason he’s been a starter under most of our managers.All of whom were in a completely different league to him in terms of the quality they showed before injuries and (mainly) age caught up with them. Martial’s still only 27 and never hit the heights of any of those players. We’re not talking about an indisputably world class player whose career was ruined by injuries. I mean he barely even managed to establish himself as an international footballer, even when he was at his very best.
Selling him is not realistic really. Ignoring the fact that we'd need to buy another forward if we were to get rid of him in addition to all the other things we need, it's more down to the fact that nobody will take him off us. He has 1 year left on his contract. It's either loan him and pay half of his wages (which is horrible business sense) and let his contract run (basically paying to get rid of him and receiving nothing), or just keep him as a depth option for a year which he is fine to be and then let his contract expire.Get rid now. Why wait. We don't need passengers in this team if we are to challenge for anything.
I get the depth argument but the man is never fit enough to start and when he does start he lasts only a few games before he's back on the treatment table.Selling him is not realistic really. Ignoring the fact that we'd need to buy another forward if we were to get rid of him in addition to all the other things we need, it's more down to the fact that nobody will take him off us. He has 1 year left on his contract. It's either loan him and pay half of his wages (which is horrible business sense) and let his contract run (basically paying to get rid of him and receiving nothing), or just keep him as a depth option for a year which he is fine to be and then let his contract expire.
Injuries are hard. Some players' bodies can't take the demands of top level football. It's more just a sad case IMO. It's the case with Pogba and Martial, same with Jones, Saha and Hargreaves before. They just can't escape constant injuries for whatever reason and it can really kill the players motivation.I get the depth argument but the man is never fit enough to start and when he does start he lasts only a few games before he's back on the treatment table.
I'm inclinded to believe that won't change for him even as a backup striker or on a rotation with an established first 11 striker.
God alone knows what kind of physical condition this man is in to always be out injured.
I think you can. You’ve named a couple of truly exceptional players and there are probably others but look at Casemiro for example and Rooney.Not really. There are plenty of players who’ve had horrible injury records but generally play pretty well when they’re not injured. Ledley King or Paul McGrath would be the classic examples. Louis Saha another, who plays the same position as Martial.
If it takes forever to reach any kind of decent level of performance then that’s a problem which is unrelated to injuries. Martial’s been fit and available for selection since the Newcastle game on April 2nd. Presumably in training for at least a week or two before that. We’re almost into June now. That’s more than enough time for any half decent player to shake off all their ring rust. Instead he’s looking as lethargic and heavy legged as the most overworked players in our squad. You just can’t put that all down to bad luck with injuries.
I think you can. You’ve named a couple of truly exceptional players and there are probably others but look at Casemiro for example and Rooney.
But we’re talking about how injuries affected them, not how good they were. It’s disingenuous to pretend that age was the main factor for their drop off, particularly Torres and Owen who pretty much finished at 26, losing most of their mobility and constantly picking up niggling injuries. Jack Wilshere is another more recent example. It happens. That’s not to say he would have even been the level required but I don’t know why it’s so hard to acknowledge that he’s been heavily impaired by injuries. Reading your posts you’d think he’s been a non-entity his whole time here, not someone who’s scored nearly 100 goals for us. There’s a reason he’s been a starter under most of our managers.
I don’t think anyone’s saying he’s a top quality player though. He was a good player imo with obvious issues with inconsistency. He also was very good in his first season to be fair to him. I think he had 17 goals and 10 assists that year, mostly playing from wide in a Van Gaal team that largely struggled for goals and an attacking spark. You can criticise his goal record, which is fair, but it’s also fair to acknowledge that he didn’t really play as a striker for us until 2019. He spent a lot of time playing wide for Mourinho who requires his wingers to defend as much as they attack. So you can criticise his goal record which is fair but when you look at it in context, it’s hardly terrible. He’s scored nearly one in three which isn’t that far off someone like Rashford who’s had a very good career for us barring last season.I’m not saying he was a complete non-entity. I’m just disagreeing with the idea that he was this top player whose career was sadly cut short by injuries. Look at his goal scoring stats. He just looks like a classic one season wonder. He had one decent season, in 2019/20 where his goalscoring peaked at 1 every 2 games (in the league) Which is good but not amazing. For the whole of the rest of his career so far he’s been about 1 in 3 or 1 in 4 (and occasionally a lot worse) And there’s no pattern of early productivity, declining over time. It’s all over the place. The only consistent thing about his productivity in front of goal is that it’s never been very impressive.
And his injuries get exaggerated as much as his goalscoring. He’s never had serious injury. Never once been stretchered off the pitch, walked around on crutches, or needed surgery. It’s all been a bunch of minor niggles. Nothing which fits with a player who lost a yard of pace after rehabbing from a bad injury.
So I’m not buying this notion that he’s a quality player who’s been unlucky with injuries. He’s an inconsistent player who’s only ever had one really good season and lacks the physical robustness to play top flight foothold. Which is exactly what we’re seeing this season.
I don’t think anyone’s saying he’s a top quality player though. He was a good player imo with obvious issues with inconsistency. He also was very good in his first season to be fair to him. I think he had 17 goals and 10 assists that year, mostly playing from wide in a Van Gaal team that largely struggled for goals and an attacking spark. You can criticise his goal record, which is fair, but it’s also fair to acknowledge that he didn’t really play as a striker for us until 2019. He spent a lot of time playing wide for Mourinho who requires his wingers to defend as much as they attack. So you can criticise his goal record which is fair but when you look at it in context, it’s hardly terrible. He’s scored nearly one in three which isn’t that far off someone like Rashford who’s had a very good career for us barring last season.
With regards to the bolded, I don’t really get your point? You only have to look at the contrast between how he moves now compared to a few years back to se he’s obviously been hampered by injuries. The fact that his body constantly breaks down, as we’ve seen this season demonstrates this quite clearly. I don’t think Ryan Giggs had major injuries either but he had to adapt his game completely because his hamstrings kept failing him. Obviously Giggs was a much better player so he was still able to perform at a good level. I think people on this forum sometimes get so consumed with criticising certain players they fail to provide any sort of balance. I’m not saying Martial would’ve been world class without the injuries but to completely disregard them is unfair. All in all, he’s had a much better career for us than a lot of players we’ve signed post Fergie, so I don’t understand this narrative that he’s a one season wonder.
I’m pretty sure he played wide in his first season and in 2018/19 though. Rooney/Rashford and Lukaku played up top those years.Re his first season. 11 goals in 31 league games. 1 in 3. Similar rate in 2018/19. Not amazing but decent. Then he had that one really good season where he hit 1 in 2. Similar to Ollie Watkins this season. Slightly worse than Ivan Toney. Albeit playing for a better team than those two.
And those would be his three most productive seasons by a margin. And he’s 27 years old now. Not a young player.
In his first season he played both. From memory he was mostly a striker in the first half of the season, then later on he was mostly out wide.I’m pretty sure he played wide in his first season and in 2018/19 though. Rooney/Rashford and Lukaku played up top those years.
In his first season he played both. From memory he was mostly a striker in the first half of the season, then later on he was mostly out wide.
I could be wrong to be fair, I thought he moved to the left after a couple months of the season when Van Gaal realised Memphis wasn’t good enough.In his first season he played both. From memory he was mostly a striker in the first half of the season, then later on he was mostly out wide.