The more I think about it the more id love to see him paired up with someone like Lukaku. Pace and Power together could be something to behold
presumably Lukaku can speak French so they could communicate well
Oh yes.. this please!
The more I think about it the more id love to see him paired up with someone like Lukaku. Pace and Power together could be something to behold
presumably Lukaku can speak French so they could communicate well
The more I think about it the more id love to see him paired up with someone like Lukaku. Pace and Power together could be something to behold
presumably Lukaku can speak French so they could communicate well
oh I wouldn't grumble at that tooI'd prefer Kane that would be a sophisticated attack.
Might just be me but I'm really not a big fan of Lukaku. We need another Martial level talent, Lukaku is tiers below.
The more I think about it the more id love to see him paired up with someone like Lukaku. Pace and Power together could be something to behold
presumably Lukaku can speak French so they could communicate well
Might just be me but I'm really not a big fan of Lukaku. We need another Martial level talent, Lukaku is tiers below.
In terms of natural ability, he's correct (well not multiple tiers). Lukaku is a very good striker but Martial given his natural gifts should go on to bigger things IMO. In terms of how naturally things come to them, Martial is a level above. There's a certain class to his game that Lukaku doesn't have.Are you serious ?
I'm beginning to feel this way as well.I'd prefer Kane that would be a sophisticated attack.
In terms of natural ability, he's correct (well not multiple tiers). Lukaku is a very good striker but Martial given his natural gifts should go on to bigger things IMO. In terms of how naturally things come to them, Martial is a level above. There's a certain class to his game that Lukaku doesn't have.
I'm beginning to feel this way as well.
Lukaku is very explosive, but Kane comes across as more refined and complete.
The more I think about it the more id love to see him paired up with someone like Lukaku. Pace and Power together could be something to behold
presumably Lukaku can speak French so they could communicate well
Availability my friend, availability.Might just be me but I'm really not a big fan of Lukaku. We need another Martial level talent, Lukaku is tiers below.
Martial has, for me, the attributes truly special players have whereas Lukaku does not. Of course, he has to develop aspects of his game, but as a raw talent when a player has his strenght, pace and genuine top class talent on the ball, then he's a bit special. Martial has that. Lukaku despite a decent goal-record has never had that. He doesn't have Henry type pick the ball up and frighten defenders or a swerve of the hips to beat a defender in a split second. That separates the good talents from the gems IMO. What Martial makes of that "gem" of a talent he is, is another matter, but so far the signs look very very good.Just reacted to the "tiers below" expression. As far as I'm concerned, the only real difference in talent between them is how easy Martial can get past his opponents. It is a big difference, Lukaku has other attributes.
football is more about effectiveness rather than that raw ability you speak of especially when it comes to strikers. Batistuta and Shearer for example didnt have that on ball ability you speak of but were both every bit in that Henry/Suarez class because their other qualities more than made up for it. Lukaku is in a similar boat and this season has shown signs that he's well on his way to being a proper big time player. Martial has a frightening amount of ability hence i believe we shouldn't even be considering signing a number 9 but until he learns to be exceptionally effective he'll always have questions on his name. There certainly isnt any tier between them in terms of potential as what Lukaku has is enough to make him the best striker in the world.Martial has, for me, the attributes truly special players have whereas Lukaku does not. Of course, he has to develop aspects of his game, but as a raw talent when a player has his strenght, pace and genuine top class talent on the ball, then he's a bit special. Martial has that. Lukaku despite a decent goal-record has never had that. He doesn't have Henry type pick the ball up and frighten defenders or a swerve of the hips to beat a defender in a split second. That separates the good talents from the gems IMO. What Martial makes of that "gem" of a talent he is, is another matter, but so far the signs look very very good.
For example, it doesn't surprise me when fans of the Belgium NT criticize Lukaku. He's very good, but he hasn't got the raw technical skill of an Henry, Suarez type footballer.
This exactly! There are players who have the potential of becoming the next Ronaldo (fat one) or Henry, not to say that they will but you know it is within them, some can never reach that level no matter what. Martial is the former, Lukaku or Kane is the latter. Of course the latter two can go on to have much better careers than Martial ever will. But the point is still that their absolute best would be reaching the levels of someone like Shearer or Andy Cole which is not bad at all at all. Martial is one of those very few who can reach higher, remains to see if he becomes one of those even fewer to actually reach it.Martial has, for me, the attributes truly special players have whereas Lukaku does not. Of course, he has to develop aspects of his game, but as a raw talent when a player has his strenght, pace and genuine top class talent on the ball, then he's a bit special. Martial has that. Lukaku despite a decent goal-record has never had that. He doesn't have Henry type pick the ball up and frighten defenders or a swerve of the hips to beat a defender in a split second. That separates the good talents from the gems IMO. What Martial makes of that "gem" of a talent he is, is another matter, but so far the signs look very very good.
For example, it doesn't surprise me when fans of the Belgium NT criticize Lukaku. He's very good, but he hasn't got the raw technical skill of an Henry, Suarez type footballer.
I wasn't speaking about effectiveness but only natural ability. And I see plenty of goals in Martial as well.football is more about effectiveness rather than that raw ability you speak of especially when it comes to strikers. Batistuta and Shearer for example didnt have that on ball ability you speak of but were both every bit in that Henry/Suarez class because their other qualities more than made up for it. Lukaku is in a similar boat and this season has shown signs that he's well on his way to being a proper big time player. Martial has a frightening amount of ability hence i believe we shouldn't even be considering signing a number 9 but until he learns to be exceptionally effective he'll always have questions on his name. There certainly isnt any tier between them in terms of potential as what Lukaku has is enough to make him the best striker in the world.
Agreed. RvN vs Henry comparison is very apt.I wasn't speaking about effectiveness but only natural ability. And I see plenty of goals in Martial as well.
And I completely disagree. Pure goalscorers are great, but in the end, they tend to fall slightly short of players who both score and frighten you when they pick up the ball and run. Hence, why as much as I loved Ruud, Henry was better. Or why Suarez, although his peak isn't that long yet, is one of the most dangerous strikers I've ever seen. I probably didn't watch Shearer at his peak, but if his ability on the ball wasn't top class, I don't see how he can compete with the names mentioned at their best. Lukaku can keep developing but he won't be as good as the likes of Henry either unless his ability on the ball drastically improves.
effectiveness is what makes the cream of the great attackers. If Lukaku puts up 35 goals a season, for consecutive seasons while being showing a degree of BMT then he'll be in any class of any striker during his peak. Shearer during his prime was every bit as good as Henry, he posed a massive threat without all this skill. His ball striking combined with his aggression ensured that for a time he was in the most feared strikers bracket. Why would a Batistuta need all this skill on the ball if hes smashing balls 30 yards away on the half turn.I wasn't speaking about effectiveness but only natural ability. And I see plenty of goals in Martial as well.
And I completely disagree. Pure goalscorers are great, but in the end, they tend to fall slightly short of players who both score and frighten you when they pick up the ball and run. Hence, why as much as I loved Ruud, Henry was better. Or why Suarez, although his peak isn't that long yet, is one of the most dangerous strikers I've ever seen. I probably didn't watch Shearer at his peak, but if his ability on the ball wasn't top class, I don't see how he can compete with the names mentioned at their best. Lukaku can keep developing but he won't be as good as the likes of Henry either unless his ability on the ball drastically improves.
Player of the month. Was a pretty shit month to be fair
Availability my friend, availability.
Player of the month. Was a pretty shit month to be fair
Player of the month. Was a pretty shit month to be fair
Of course but if you make a decision to only sign the worlds best players because thats where you feel you belong, you'll end up frustrated when you cant sign anybody because the worlds best players rarely move, and when they do 4 or 5 clubs are in for them.I'm not a big fan of just signing people like this because they're the only ones available in January. That's how you end up where Liverpool are.
some things are funnier than others, some are notMight just be me but I'm really not a big fan of Lukaku. We need another Martial level talent, Lukaku is tiers below.
Lukaku is a modern great already?Hate all this talk of comparing his potential to some of the modern greats. Let the lad actually achieve something first other than a big bucks transfer before he's talked about to such levels.
Effectiveness isn't only goals which is the point you're missing.effectiveness is what makes the cream of the great attackers. If Lukaku puts up 35 goals a season, for consecutive seasons while being showing a degree of BMT then he'll be in any class of any striker during his peak. Shearer during his prime was every bit as good as Henry, he posed a massive threat without all this skill. His ball striking combined with his aggression ensured that for a time he was in the most feared strikers bracket. Why would a Batistuta need all this skill on the ball if hes smashing balls 30 yards away on the half turn.
Whether Henry was better than RVN or not is another debate by itself however during the time he wasn't considered in another tier to him or Eto'o or Schevchenko.