Vato
Watches other men wank.Supports Real.Coincidence?
It was a shot, you lunatics.
We created two good chances before the freekick (Mata's shot and Rojo's cross which RVP should have left for Herrera). I think we looked much more lively than the Moyes days. Most of the time very little happens in the first 20 minutes anyway because teams are still trying to figure each other out.Agreed with this. For all the positivity about the 'amazing' football, we had a lot of the ball but struggled to create proper chances until Di Maria's free kick. It was the sort of the fast start we occasionally saw under Moyes, before Rooney would score a free kick.
It's still something we really need to work on, because even when the other team's defence is deep, you still see City getting to the byline and creating really good chances inside the box early on.
The days when we consistently create good clear cut chances early on, and score from one of them to take the lead - that's when I'll be really really impressed.
Di Maria's goal came at a great time, because we were struggling to actually open them up.
Coasting in the second half was nothing special - we did that under Moyes at home a few times against relegation teams.
We're fine when we go in 3-0 up, it's creating proper chances early on that we struggle with.
And it still needs to be improved quite a bit.
Indeed. It would have been an idiotic shot, 2 defenders in front of him to block it as well had he gotten it on target.OMG, why would Di Maria shoot from that distance and from that angle? It doesn't make sense, it would be a complete waste of an opportunity and he knows it. He saw Mata and knew he needed a powerfully driven pass so the ball could reach him. It's a pass.
Yep.Indeed. It would have been an idiotic shot, 2 defenders in front of him to block it as well had he gotten it on target.
Indeed. It would have been an idiotic shot, 2 defenders in front of him to block it as well had he gotten it on target.
How can anyone think he didn't shoot there?
How can anybody think he did shoot there?How can anyone think he didn't shoot there?
Whether it was intended as a shot or a driven pass, the ball blatantly didn't end up going the direction he intended it to go.
He looks straight at Mata, bro. Half a second before he drives the pass in. He's that good.
I don't actually understand how this can even be up for debate, the way him and Mata were laughing about it afterwards makes it more than obvious that it wasn't meant to be a pass.
Can't believe how close that poll is. 100% a mis-hit shot for me. The technique used to strike the ball and the reactions after tell the story.
Agreed with this. For all the positivity about the 'amazing' football, we had a lot of the ball but struggled to create proper chances until Di Maria's free kick. It was the sort of the fast start we occasionally saw under Moyes, before Rooney would score a free kick.
It's still something we really need to work on, because even when the other team's defence is deep, you still see City getting to the byline and creating really good chances inside the box early on.
The days when we consistently create good clear cut chances early on, and score from one of them to take the lead - that's when I'll be really really impressed.
Di Maria's goal came at a great time, because we were struggling to actually open them up.
Coasting in the second half was nothing special - we did that under Moyes at home a few times against relegation teams.
We're fine when we go in 3-0 up, it's creating proper chances early on that we struggle with.
And it still needs to be improved quite a bit.
It may well have been a shot but the technique is also very much one that could be intended as a driven cross. It was mishit either way so the reaction after isn't conclusive either. One things for sure though a shot from there for a left footer made no sense whatsoever.
Did you see Mata and Di Maria joking with other when they were walking back to their own half? I can't believe anyone who saw that clip could believe it was done on purpose.
Sure, it's just a bit funny that it's so difficult for United fans to admit, given that it doesn't matter the least bit anyway. If you asked the question on any non-United fan board, you'd get 95 % saying it was a shot.It wasn't done on purpose. It was clearly mishit. But I think it was meant to be a cross across the 6 yard box that ended up being scuffed and going behind the defenders to Mata. Either way it hardly matters that much I suppose. Lets be thankful that this is the most heated debate this week and not moaning over another terrible performance
Sure, it's just a bit funny that it's so difficult for United fans to admit, given that it doesn't matter the least bit anyway. If you asked the question on any non-United fan board, you'd get 95 % saying it was a shot.
Still don't see it. You don't swing your leg with that force for a cross. Anyway, point is the same: he scuffed it and got lucky. It doesn't matter one bit but it's just a bit silly to make it out as if it was a genius pass.Motd said it was a mishit cross in fairness.
Still don't see it. You don't swing your leg with that force for a cross. Anyway, point is the same: he scuffed it and got lucky. It doesn't matter one bit but it's just a bit silly to make it out as if it was a genius pass.
How can anyone think he didn't shoot there?
and without CL football...We've signed the exact player we need, who is in his prime, who is one of the best in the world. Incredible.
Where would people rank Di Maria in relation to the best players in the world, top10?
Think it's fair to say he's behind Bale and possibly Neymar, id say he's ahead of James Rodriguez though.
This is the closest poll we've ever had
Amazing how so many people can be so wrong
People really think that was a shot? Wow, just wow! I can understand some thinking it was a mishit pass. because he maybe wanted to cross it instead of passing it like that, but not in a million years that was a misshit shot.