Genuine question
What sets him apart from all those other Celtic managers who won everything?
My worry for Spurs and their fans would be that he did, undeniably, look naive in Europe. Was that a result of lesser players not being able to fully implement his vision, or was it naive tactics teams were able to exploit?
Revisiting this statement next May .Yes, I think like with De Zerbi many are in for a surprise with Ange Postecoglou.
Good manager on the pitch and has an eye in the market. He has a good personality as well.
This is a good appointment for Spurs, and if they have a good summer, they will be challenging for the top 4 next season.
Classic Peter Guillam, always posting about progressive coachesIt's the style in which they won. Ange has always set his teams up to play high intensity attacking football and he is a much more 'modern' coach than any of his predecessors at Celtic. He basically ticks every box that fans want in a manager these days. His views on the way football should be played, his ability to get teams to buy into his vision, his communication, relationships with players and fans etc. His methods are also conducive to long term success, as his last two clubs (Yokohama & Melbourne) achieved success after he left by continuing to play Ange's way.
I'm an Aussie and have been waiting over a decade for him to get a chance at this level. Coming from a relative footballing backwater in Australia hasn't been easy for him to build the profile needed to get noticed but he is absolutely the real deal. Everywhere he's gone fans have loved him because his teams are just so fun to watch.
I realise all of this sounds a little too good to be true so here's the catch..
This is his only real weakness. It isn't naivety or a reflection of his players ability. It's pure pig headed stubbornness. Ange flat out refuses to compromise from playing his way, even in the face of much stronger opposition. In Australia we loved that about him as we were sick of parking the bus against better sides in the World Cup only to still lose anyway, but under Ange we took the game to our opponents even when we were thoroughly outclassed. His Celtic side were exactly the same in Europe - perhaps he could have got better results by playing more conservatively but that is unthinkable to Ange. He will never die wondering.
4 year deal is pretty mad, what will they do if they are bottom half at Christmas? I think it's a massive gamble.
Accidental good appointment
That's my main worry about it. Spurs have been a relatively slow low-intensity team for quite some time now, so I expect there to be some tears along the way towards where Ange will be pushing them. Similar to us, where we had been largely one style of play with players mostly suited to that style, so while ETH certainly got some improvement we're still a long way from where he obviously wants us to be.Always sceptical of any manager coming from success in Scotland however I think this guy may do well if he's given time to build something.
They need a reset, shift Kane (to us) and change of style.
He's a great guy, I hope PL wont eat him up.
Why are so many writing him off already? Almost Souness-esque in here, probably because he's not British and hasn't managed in the PL. Not every appointment from abroad is a success - but there's been so many that have been written off before they've even managed a game.
Think it's more where Spurs are currently.
Kane probably leaving this summer, Son in general decline and a defence that shipped 60 + goals last season with two 36 year old keepers.
It's a harder situation to inherit at Spurs than what Mourinho and Conte had when they came in and will take 2-3 transfer windows to fix and that's with getting majority of signings right.
i don’t think at his age he would have left Celtic for a 2 year contract.
Why are so many writing him off already? Almost Souness-esque in here, probably because he's not British and hasn't managed in the PL. Not every appointment from abroad is a success - but there's been so many that have been written off before they've even managed a game.
I don't think anyone dislikes him, more like Levy & Spurs in general after Poch has been very mismanaged and it's hard to deliver in all that while actually trying yo build a working structure.Why are so many writing him off already? Almost Souness-esque in here, probably because he's not British and hasn't managed in the PL. Not every appointment from abroad is a success - but there's been so many that have been written off before they've even managed a game.