Stack
Leave Women's Football Alone!!!
That might help nudge his selling price up a bit.
The problem is that in a competitive match he is not going to take that shot. He is a good technical player who can be a decent squad player.
Yeah huge shame. I remember being so excited after his Granada loan.It's a real shame he hasn't kicked on, I was sure he would make it as a kid. He's just lacking that extra 10%, be it his brain or body.
He seems to have lost his identity here as well. Plays nothing like he did in the youth set up. There he was confident, skilled, a difference maker. Comes into the first team and plays like a budget Nicky Butt.
Tonight was more the player I always expected but we know he can't carry that into the Prem when the speed and physicality picks up.
Him and Januzaj got in trouble for having a game during a match trying to see who could score first directly from a corner.
Probably has to do with the goal as well, but he's been here for about 10 years now. Few of our players can say that, would have loved for him to have shone here. He has all the attributes but it just doesn't quite come together, wouldnt mind him at Ajax at all.He is popular among our players. Check his comment section on insta today. Blind, depay, Pogba, Bruno, fred etc everyone has chip in
He didnt go on loan till very late which was more the issue rather than him not playing on loan. United ruined his development by including him in the first team squad and not playing him during important years in his development.Pereira is a prime example of why I was having a discussion with another poster yesterday about the loan system not working for us.
Pereira is 25 years old, yet has only played 73.5 games worth of minutes in top-flight league football (sure, there are a few Europa League/Champions League appearances too)
It's not enough football for a player to keep developing. Realistically, sell him at 20 and insert a buy-back clause. Let him go and play every week in a settled side and fulfil his potential.
Instead, we've a 25 year old who is fairly talented but still quite sheltered, in terms of the footballing experience a team like Villa or Brighton would want to spend £30m
He didnt go on loan till very late which was more the issue rather than him not playing on loan. United ruined his development by including him in the first team squad and not playing him during important years in his development.
Saying that though maybe he just wasnt good enough
You could be right. Pereira just isnt a good example as he played u23 football and even no football till the age of 22 before then being allowed out on loan. Between 18-22 he lost 3-4 years of developmentI have a theory about the trajectory of footballers though. Some, regardless of their level, have a 'hard-ceiling', because they have a certain skillset which makes them effective. Perhaps it's something like dribbling in a wide-player or heading in a CB or finishing in a CF. When that player reaches their natural level, there's not much more improvement to come because they will come up against better players and/or there will be comparable players with the same skills or better.
Other players, generally CMs or CBs in my experience, need to play for a certain amount of time AT a level, to determine whether or not they are good enough. If you think about the skillset needed by a CB or a CM, it's really about making and executing decisions and skills effectively and quickly. There's not 'one thing' you do that stands-out, it's heading, tackling, passing, first-touch, vision, awareness etc...and what you generally find is, when you first move up and play at a level, you're miles off the pace and everything seems to be happening too quickly and your game completely falls apart.
After a while playing at that speed, you either sink or swim. You become comfortable or you don't. The point is, you won't know unless you play consistently at that level. There's nothing else that can prepare you for it.
Now, Manchester United can't just chuck young CMs or young CBs into the team and give them a season to 'see how they get on', for obvious reasons. So we inevitably send them on loan to a 'lesser league', which again, doesn't really serve the purpose of what we are trying to achieve i.e. get them used to the pace, intensity and aggression of 1st-team football in the Premier League.
Hence why I advocate selling players if they haven't broken into the team by 20. If it gets to that point and they are not picking up regular starts or sub appearances, then their development is going to be stunted. Far better to sell them and let them play every week and answer the question - can they keep developing? Can they climb the ladder? If we're smart, we insert reasonable buy-back clauses into the agreements so we lose nothing.
You could be right. Pereira just isnt a good example as he played u23 football and even no football till the age of 22 before then being allowed out on loan. Between 18-22 he lost 3-4 years of development
Agree with you, there's worse in the Jones thread.Whatever his future is, I don't condone any bullying for our players.
In twitter for example, the comments on the tweet about this goal is filled with disrespect and bullying.
"wished he didn't score that goal so that Glazers won't offer him new 5 year contract."
These are professional players, they still have some serious skills. Poor lad.
€25m
I'd say £12-15m is a good price for him tbh. He just needs to set some roots somewhere, knuckle down and he'll become a great player for someone like Fenerbahce.That was apparently the price for him already last season.
6-8m is a fair price.
It's actually quite simple, the development of a young player is simply a process of developing a number of "playing habits". Of course there's also his strength, pace, technique etc. So a player must hit the gym, do his routines and most importantly, play.I have a theory about the trajectory of footballers though. Some, regardless of their level, have a 'hard-ceiling', because they have a certain skillset which makes them effective. Perhaps it's something like dribbling in a wide-player or heading in a CB or finishing in a CF. When that player reaches their natural level, there's not much more improvement to come because they will come up against better players and/or there will be comparable players with the same skills or better.
Other players, generally CMs or CBs in my experience, need to play for a certain amount of time AT a level, to determine whether or not they are good enough. If you think about the skillset needed by a CB or a CM, it's really about making and executing decisions and skills effectively and quickly. There's not 'one thing' you do that stands-out, it's heading, tackling, passing, first-touch, vision, awareness etc...and what you generally find is, when you first move up and play at a level, you're miles off the pace and everything seems to be happening too quickly and your game completely falls apart.
After a while playing at that speed, you either sink or swim. You become comfortable or you don't. The point is, you won't know unless you play consistently at that level. There's nothing else that can prepare you for it.
Now, Manchester United can't just chuck young CMs or young CBs into the team and give them a season to 'see how they get on', for obvious reasons. So we inevitably send them on loan to a 'lesser league', which again, doesn't really serve the purpose of what we are trying to achieve i.e. get them used to the pace, intensity and aggression of 1st-team football in the Premier League.
Hence why I advocate selling players if they haven't broken into the team by 20. If it gets to that point and they are not picking up regular starts or sub appearances, then their development is going to be stunted. Far better to sell them and let them play every week and answer the question - can they keep developing? Can they climb the ladder? If we're smart, we insert reasonable buy-back clauses into the agreements so we lose nothing.
The problem is that players like Pereira, Lingard, Dalot, Tuanzebe or Wiliams (Apparently no one at Southampton earns more money than him) are on amazing wages here.I'd say £12-15m is a good price for him tbh. He just needs to set some roots somewhere, knuckle down and he'll become a great player for someone like Fenerbahce.
Liverpool would get £10-15m for him and everyone on here would praise them for it, no reason why we shouldn't.
It's actually quite simple, the development of a young player is simply a process of developing a number of "playing habits". Of course there's also his strength, pace, technique etc. So a player must hit the gym, do his routines and most importantly, play.
If you ever play football you'd understand there's no time to think in a football match. Your body will react before your brain, according to your "playing habits". It's not like there's time to think this is situation A, B I should do this do that. All happens in a blink of eye, the faster the tempo the harder it gets. And basically you can't change your habits once it's established, it's very very hard to change those. That's why so many players struggle when they move to a bigger league especially the PL. Or why you'd see a player repeating the same mistake over and over. It's not like he doesn't know he has made a mistake, but in a similar situation his body would react exactly the same due to his playing habits. That's aso why you'd see a player is not very good at the start of his career, but as time goes on he'd grow into a better player. Of course there's also help from coaches etc. but most importantly it's himself. His brain and body.
Tbh I've always felt guys who say why Ole doesn't coach this player to do this do that is simply nonsense and doesn't know shit about football. Of course he would tell the player, but whether if the player could change his playing habits is entirely on himself.
To develop, adjust and test a combination of your "playing habits", your strength, pace etc. - your ability, your skillset you'd need to adequately play at the necessary level. That's why all young players really need competitive game time. And those don't get would never fulfill their potential.
Btw I totally agree with the buy back clause thing, it would be a very smart choice.