Andre Onana made another mistake. Ohnono.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Onana for the first one, watch his right foot, just stays on the ground, no push off, no spring, that's a saveable shot.
 
Trust me, it would make a huge difference
I'm really curious to hear which keeper you think would be getting the side conceding more shots per game than every side in the league bar the record-breakingly shite defence of Sheffield United into a much higher position than we are...
 
We've been spoilt by having de gea when he was at his peak, pull off ridiculous saves.

Onana doesnt have that in his locker. Number 1 criteria for a Utd No1 keeper should be world class shot stopping ability. All the crap about being able to play out from the back is secondary.

How much nonsense was posted when we signed him that he would be a transformative keeper and allow us to play a high line etc. Transformative he has been, by being useless at shot stopping.
 
I won't disagree with you too much on that, I wouldn't have him as a top shot stopper.
I'm not sure even a top one does much for this team, it's a mess.
A top keeper obviously wouldn't do much for this team. We're conceding more shots than any team in the league bar a side that has literally broken the record for goals conceded in Premier League history.

Anyone who thinks there is a keeper out there who would have us getting considerably better results knows feck all about the sport they're watching. I'm sorry, it really is that simple.
 
I'm really curious to hear which keeper you think would be getting the side conceding more shots per game than every side in the league bar the record-breakingly shite defence of Sheffield United into a much higher position than we are...
Why is it that lower placed keepers, who always face more shots, usually have a good save percentage and their stats very strong and they get bought by teams higher up the leagues?

Because while they face volume, their ability as shit stoppers means they can make more saves, not less.

Now variance happens depending on how clinical the opposition are but in general, teams will have pot shots and saveable shots, they won't all be worldies.

So just because he has a high volume of shots, doesn't mean he naturally has to ship the most goals.

But besides from the stats, the eye test. The guy cannot make routine saves.
 
A top keeper obviously wouldn't do much for this team. We're conceding more shots than any team in the league bar a side that has literally broken the record for goals conceded in Premier League history.

Anyone who thinks there is a keeper out there who would have us getting considerably better results knows feck all about the sport they're watching. I'm sorry, it really is that simple.
You have zero clue about statistics. It's really that simple.
 
Yeah I’m out. Not a safe pair of hands by any means. Any shot on target has a good chance of going in against him.
 
I won't disagree with you too much on that, I wouldn't have him as a top shot stopper.
I'm not sure even a top one does much for this team, it's a mess.
It wouldn't have made a bug difference in the league at this point but overall, looking at the season, it's had a big effect because going out of the CL like we did was in a big way on him. Psychologically it has no doubt had a big effect in a negative way on our squad.
 
Why is it that lower placed keepers, who always face more shots, usually have a good save percentage and their stats very strong and they get bought by teams higher up the leagues?

Because while they face volume, their ability as shit stoppers means they can make more saves, not less.

Now variance happens depending on how clinical the opposition are but in general, teams will have pot shots and saveable shots, they won't all be worldies.

So just because he has a high volume of shots, doesn't mean he naturally has to ship the most goals.

But besides from the stats, the eye test. The guy cannot make routine saves.
Onana's stats are strong, so I have no idea why you're bringing that up like it's a point against him.

Lower league keepers also don't face nearly the same level of scrutiny that Onana has, which is entirely fair since they cost far less and are playing for lower league sides, but if they did I guarantee you that plenty of people would be saying they're "shite" (unfairly) as well.
 
The difference between Onana and a top keeper is they save two of those goals, maybe three and keep us in the game.
 
Why does he just not move his feet? Why doesn’t he save much? Why does no one fecking move into space for him to pass to them?

This has not worked.
 
Doesn’t help him that we’ve had proper keepers like schmeichal, VDS and DDG. He is nowhere near their level and more like the ones we had in between thst needed changing. Simply not good enough.
 
If you ever go in goal as an outfield player I'm sure it instantly hits you that the goal looks a lot bigger now you have to cover it. And it is daunting and frankly exhausting trying to move from one post to another as a cross is launched in all the while tracking the flight of the ball. That's why it takes a lot more than being able to save shots to be a great goalkeeper. Onana has become quite good at saving shots when he can step forward and close the angle down (this is usually when a ball is played in behind for a forward to run onto). He is still very poor at saving shots where he has to move across the goal line.
 
The bottom line to all of this, regardless of whether Onana is shite or not, is that he certainly hasn't improved the team one bit or quelled the fan infighting about the goalkeeper position. At absolute best he was a £45m sidegrade from De Gea, who could have been kept on for free on reduced terms. As a piece of transfer business it has to go down as an utter failure. There's no other logical way to look at it.
 
The difference between Onana and a top keeper is they save two of those goals, maybe three and keep us in the game.
Agreed. He doesn't have the ability to make saves he shouldnt be able to get to i.e. like the very best keepers do. Somehow they keep the ball out by pulling off a worldoe save.
 
Why isn't he subbed or benched then? Why was he allowed to continue to play? We all know he's terrible and the one person who can do something about that didn't do diddly squat.
 
Terrible keeper. We could have got Costa from Porto for the same price.
Meh, everyone absolutely despised him after his disasterclass against Ghana in the WC. I don't think he was the answer either.
 
Everton are going down. Picking up Pickford then?

Edit: Oh shoot. They are 15th?
 
There is no doubt that Onana is not our level and, say, Ramsdale is head and shoulders better, but pinning all goals today on Onana is also completely unfair.

fecking Casemiro was an absolute disaster, causing goal-scoring situations for pretty much every goal and the rest of the team were zombies, so it's not like everybody else played even decently and Onana was shit. If anything he was above-average shit in a team that were stinking bottom of the barrel shit. Just saying
 
I refuse to believe there aren't at least 100 professional goalkeepers across Europe and South America who would be a significant upgrade on him and who are valued at a max of 10m. The criteria is just "able to move his feet" at this point.

Of all the deficient elements of Manchester United over the last decade, scouting has to be very near the top of the list.
 
I've said this for sometime and repeated it on the match day thread:

He doesn't make saves, he makes blocks. Shots have to hit him.

His footwork is a joke for a professional keeper, always late, leaden footed, is still setting himself as shots come in, leaving him with distances to cover. Example; Hughes had a volley from the edge of the area, it's in the middle of the goal but Onana is at finger tips to make what is a routine catch tbh.

I've said it so many times in here but his hand eye coordination and technique in actually handling shots and ball manipulation is absolutely insane, I've never seen anything like it. It's why you see so many shots come off of him at weird, unpredictable angles, seemingly always back into danger.

The ball always hits the base of his hand/top of his wrist, like a block, sending the ball back where it comes.

He cannot judge the flight of the ball so saves rarely hit the "meat" of his palm and fingers, instead hit his wrist where, and this is crucial, he has not control.

He had no athletic ability, no spring, slow to get down, cannot cover the top corners, cannot cover the bottom corners, really does play like a 5'8" keeper.

So much technically wrong with him but everything was overlooked because he can pass the ball (so what tbh) and he's ETH guy.
:lol: Can’t actually argue with that. good descriptions.

It’s weird cos he’s not been as horrific as I thought he’d be, especially after his start. But yeah some goals go in and I’m just what the feck are actually doing.
 
I said it before but it really was a pointless signing. If you want to sign Onana then you need to play to his strengths and have defenders and midfielders who can comfortably come and receive the ball under pressure. I only trust Martinez, Shaw and now Mainoo for this.

If you want to sign Onana then we needed to go all in for a couple of defenders and midfielders. Those signings should have been done first imo, so we could keep hold of the ball and act like and actual team and not face 20 plus shots a game exposing Onanas obvious weakness of actually saving shots outside of his normal reach.
 
Can't believe the high amount of posts I've read on social media recently where people are picking who they would keep & who they would get rid of during this summer & a large amount of people are saying keep Onana, you even see some posts on here with people saying keep Onana. :rolleyes:
 
Rumours around that Oblak is up for sale, let's give them Onana plus cash

Then find a good young keeper to take over when he's done.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.