I'd imagine he plays tomorrow right away, ten hags not one to waste time on players who won't play a role and he'll see it like training I'm sure.
6 foot 3 inches. Good height for a goalie, tall but not so big you are all clumsy.Either those doors are weirdly small or he’s massive. I do like my keepers to be tall. What’s his height?
6 foot 3 inches. Good height for a goalie, tall but not so big you are all clumsy.
His frame def makes him look taller than he is. But next to average Dutchman VdS you can tell the 6.2/6.3 is probably spot on.6 foot 3 inches. Good height for a goalie, tall but not so big you are all clumsy.
Perfect height for a man.
In fact, anyone who is not 6ft 3 is a loser.
I'm exactly 6'3' so I approve of this logic...
High 5 my 6ft 3 bro.
What's up with you miniature people congregating in this thread. I can see your bald spot.Back at you...we the see the world the same way...an endless parade or bald spots.
Definitely, Onana has more muscular frames, wouldn’t be surprised if he weighs more than VDS, also appears to have added more muscle since that pic.His frame def makes him look taller than he is. But next to average Dutchman VdS you can tell the 6.2/6.3 is probably spot on.
1,90.5 meters. He is just as tall DDG and IMO got an average keeper height. He ain’t the tallest (like 2 meter tall Curtois) but isn’t short for a keeper in any way (like 1,83 meters David Ospina).6 foot 3 inches. Good height for a goalie, tall but not so big you are all clumsy.
1,90.5 meters. He is just as tall DDG and IMO got an average keeper height. He ain’t tha tallest but isn’t short for a keeper in any way.
What's up with you miniature people congregating in this thread. I can see your bald spot.
This guy has got some swag
Really is weird, 1 - 11 hasn't been a thing since squad numbers were brought in donkey's years ago.It doesn’t make a scrap of difference to the player’s ability, so what the feck does it matter ? Actually, it perhaps does. If a player has a preference then it’s always best to give them their number, even just for the psychological impact (could be a good luck omen etc).
The obsession with shirt numbers here is mind boggling.
According to Wikipedia his full name is Andre Onana Onana. Seriously? Lends itself to a chant at least.
Onana Onana, duh duh de doo doo
Onana Onana duh duh de doo
Onana Onana duh duh de doo doo, de doo doo, de doo doo de doo de doo de doo doo doo doo doo
Which very good striker are we going to get for 50m?I would rate De Gea as a 6/10 whereas our ST is a 1/10.
Personally I believe the GK situation should of been addressed only after the resolution of our ST one. Those 50 mil could of been redirected for a very good striker or strikers, for that matter.
It remains to be seen who do we buy.
Which very good striker are we going to get for 50m?
So which striker would we pay £100m for? Kane/Osimhen isn't an option.That amount could of been allocated on top of what we already can afford to pay, presuming we have a plan to buy a ST.
I heard this Jøslus Complæntsson is quite a ladSo which striker would we pay £100m for? Kane/Osimhen isn't an option.
I think it possible, but not ethical. I think we should annule his contractI dont think it is possible to drop magazines to Old Trafford like that, its illegal and could have killed someone.
Crazy the amount of people demanding a World Class striker without acknowledging that there aren't any available. Even suggesting that we shouldn't have signed Onana and kept De Gea, just so we could put the money towards this mythical £100m creature.I heard this Jøslus Complæntsson is quite a lad
I think it possible, but not ethical. I think we should annule his contract
Fair play to the camera man as well outsideI dont think it is possible to drop magazines to Old Trafford like that, its illegal and could have killed someone.
I'm mostly surprised how people look at the game as if it's just 11 fellas of %/100 put together, instead of the interplay between players, like maybe DDG and Onana have the same skill level on average, but the interplay between him and Lisandro (and the other defenders, etc) would simply change the overall team, just by his playing style, that the whole %/100 will change of multiple players, with some looking better, and probably some worse. You can't just add a 6/10 striker up front and think the whole team average is suddenly fixed, your team could be better off with a 4/10 striker who just gets Rashford.Crazy the amount of people demanding a World Class striker without acknowledging that there aren't any available. Even suggesting that we shouldn't have signed Onana and kept De Gea, just so we could put the money towards this mythical £100m creature.
Love him already. Does his own thing stick by what he believes in
ps thinks he meant coolest video in that tweet
I'm exactly 6'3' so I approve of this logic...
High 5 my 6ft 3 bro.
Look at the short freaks club.
Crazy the amount of people demanding a World Class striker without acknowledging that there aren't any available. Even suggesting that we shouldn't have signed Onana and kept De Gea, just so we could put the money towards this mythical £100m creature.
DeGea at 375k a week buys you Onana. What’s your point?I would rate De Gea as a 6/10 whereas our ST is a 1/10.
Personally I believe the GK situation should of been addressed only after the resolution of our ST one. Those 50 mil could of been redirected for a very good striker or strikers, for that matter.
It remains to be seen who do we buy.
Kane is completely unavailable to us. It would only happen if he was a free agent. Højlund should cost similar money to Mount.It's a pity that Kane just signed a contract extension with Spurs till 2035, otherwise we might of been interested.
In today's market even Hojlund will cost us around 100 mil.