mav_9me
Full Member
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2009
- Messages
- 12,854
Do you reckon he'd be open to another Championship loan?
At this point either he becomes part of our attack rotation or he goes to an EPL club.
Do you reckon he'd be open to another Championship loan?
Where did you get the 2 1/2 years of being on loan? Half a season at Rangers and now going into the 2nd half of a year's loan at Sunderland. Actual time-wise, that's basically 1 season of senior football under his belt.
At this point either he becomes part of our attack rotation or he goes to an EPL club.
Do you reckon he'd be open to another Championship loan?
I think that was the joke.I doubt we’d loan him to Everton, no
I mean the way Antony's playing, if it continues he will get games at RW as well.
They don’t play in the same positionHe can replace Eriksen
They don’t play in the same position
Someone on the UWS podcast said that Amads very good at releasing the ball quickly before he's tackled. He said he's learned to be quick brained to make up for being small and not pacey.
From what I've seen, I think hes very good in tight spaces. I think he'd be useful in games against teams in a low block
Quite mad to think we didn't have a natural RW since Valencia moved to right back, now all of a sudden we've got 4.I don't understand why so many are so keen to rush him back when things are going well for his development at Sunderland.
As usual, some were too quick too right him off and now some are too quick to declare him the second-coming.
Realistically, if he comes back next season, he's competing with Rashford (top scorer), Sancho (£73m), Anthony (£80m), Garnacho (big breakthrough season) and possibly Bruno, Elanga, Martial and Pellistri for minutes as a wide-forward
Unless we're sure he's coming back to start 20+ games, I say let him continue to play every week out on loan, he's still only 20, even if he comes back to us at 21/22, he's still all of his best years ahead of him
Quite mad to think we didn't have a natural RW since Valencia moved to right back, now all of a sudden we've got 4.
Anthony Martial , Romelu Lukaku, Nemanja Matić, Alexis Sanchez are players bought for those roles, some of the blame goes to the managers as wellAnother "legacy" of the Glazers
just as we didn't replace Carrick as DM, RVP as a ST etc
I don't understand why so many are so keen to rush him back when things are going well for his development at Sunderland.
As usual, some were too quick too right him off and now some are too quick to declare him the second-coming.
Realistically, if he comes back next season, he's competing with Rashford (top scorer), Sancho (£73m), Anthony (£80m), Garnacho (big breakthrough season) and possibly Bruno, Elanga, Martial and Pellistri for minutes as a wide-forward
Unless we're sure he's coming back to start 20+ games, I say let him continue to play every week out on loan, he's still only 20, even if he comes back to us at 21/22, he's still all of his best years ahead of him
Hope they get promoted and he can stay there for another season.
While I understand everyone excitement about Amad, there is a big step up from championship to EPL.
We signed one of the best young talent in championship - Zaha and he took several years to make it in EPL with Crystal Palace.
We need to be absolutely sure Amad is ready for Man Utd before getting him back. I feel his next step should be a loan move to a EPL team and if he can perform then we bring him back.
How long did it take Madison or Grealish. He should get an opportunity in preseason.While I understand everyone excitement about Amad, there is a big step up from championship to EPL.
We signed one of the best young talent in championship - Zaha and he took several years to make it in EPL with Crystal Palace.
We need to be absolutely sure Amad is ready for Man Utd before getting him back. I feel his next step should be a loan move to a EPL team and if he can perform then we bring him back.
I don't think he would be open after the season he has had there and I wouldn't be open either. He is good enough to play regularly for Manchester United today and should be integrated into the core first team as soon as he comes back.Do you reckon he'd be open to another Championship loan?
I'm sorry but I disagree. What does Garnacho have that Amad doesn't? I'd even argue that Amad was far more potent playing against guys several years older at U23 level than Garnacho was. He is good enough to play for United immediately and has been good enough since he joined. He has just never gotten the sustained run of games that should have been given to him. Another loan would be taking the p*** and would simply be incredibly unfair to him. He deserves a sustained crack at regular first team football like has been given to Garnacho and we can have our wide forward positions sorted for a decade at least.While I understand everyone excitement about Amad, there is a big step up from championship to EPL.
We signed one of the best young talent in championship - Zaha and he took several years to make it in EPL with Crystal Palace.
We need to be absolutely sure Amad is ready for Man Utd before getting him back. I feel his next step should be a loan move to a EPL team and if he can perform then we bring him back.
Have you watched Utd ever?He can replace Eriksen
Don't think so. At first rotate wit Antony on the right and eventually replace BrunoHe can replace Eriksen
Nope, as demonstrated by manager after manager loaning him out. This loan spell has been great for him and i hope he comes back and is integrated into the squad but let's not rewrite history.I'm sorry but I disagree. What does Garnacho have that Amad doesn't? I'd even argue that Amad was far more potent playing against guys several years older at U23 level than Garnacho was. He is good enough to play for United immediately and has been good enough since he joined. He has just never gotten the sustained run of games that should have been given to him. Another loan would be taking the p*** and would simply be incredibly unfair to him. He deserves a sustained crack at regular first team football like has been given to Garnacho and we can have our wide forward positions sorted for a decade at least.
Zaha didn't get a chance here. He went to Palace and continued his trajectory.
To be fair, his ability with the ball at his feet I would agree has always been good enough, his issue has been learning how to use his slight frame, which needed a run of games that we just couldn’t give him (we probably would have if he had Garnacho’s blistering pace to make up for it, but that’s another matter). Rangers decided it was too high pressure to risk him like that which was unfortunate and I’d argue daft on their part but their prerogative. If only he hadn’t got injured the day of his Feyenoord medical eh.Nope, as demonstrated by manager after manager loaning him out. This loan spell has been great for him and i hope he comes back and is integrated into the squad but let's not rewrite history.
"Manager after manager". The manager who loaned him out also did a terrible job and was subsequently terminated. The manager who refused to play him at Rangers has also been fired. Just because a manager makes a decision doesn't mean its the correct one. He's always been good enough. He scored in a european quarterfinal and was one of our best players on the night, was our best player at Wolves on the final day of that season and he was never given a sustained chance after that. Next thing we know Ten Hag was deploying him as a Centre Forward.Nope, as demonstrated by manager after manager loaning him out. This loan spell has been great for him and i hope he comes back and is integrated into the squad but let's not rewrite history.