Lentwood
Full Member
Yeah, looked like it might have been his eye.
No that's how he always celebrates
Yeah, looked like it might have been his eye.
No that's how he always celebrates
Should be Antonys back up next season.
Really annoys me that we persisted with giving Elanga minutes over him.
Very talented player. people seem to forget he’s only 20.
Yup! A-lot of people wrote him off after his Rangers spell. Only turned 20 in July and he's clearly a big talent.
Technically very good.
He and Sancho will have to answer the same questions though (I’m not writing Sancho off yet like many).
They have all the technical ability in world but they need the mental toughness and determination to go with it.
Exactly. Not his problem that he isn't Messi or Ronaldo.Very talented player. people seem to forget he’s only 20.
Amad is the superior talent.Not saying Diallo isn’t the player who can give Antony cover/challenge but what about Pellistri (also 20)?
Guess if rumours he wants to leave are true, that could make the decision for us but not seen anything to make one stand out over the other.
In what way?Amad is the superior talent.
Yet Pellistri plays for Uruguay without even (really) having played for usAmad is the superior talent.
In my opinion he has a more expansive skillset. Both are good dribblers, but Amad also has great vision and a superior passing range. In my view, Amad is better technically, more creative and is a bigger goal threat too.In what way?
Yeah from the little I have seen, Pellistri has actually played well for Uruguay.Yet Pellistri plays for Uruguay without even (really) having played for us
He's a really curious case. Actually featuring for a biggish national team before breaking through for his clubYeah from the little I have seen, Pellistri has actually played well for Uruguay.
It is definitely unorthodox. Unfortunately, the loan moves we planned for him were pretty ill-advised. He does have some really good qualities. He's quick and direct, plays with intensity and with a good work rate. Also, decent link up play within a short distance. I just don't see his game as being expansive enough though. I think he will go on to have a decent career in Spain. Perhaps he can even go one further and make United look a bit silly in a few years.He's a really curious case. Actually featuring for a biggish national team before breaking through for his club
Ok. I don’t think he’s better technically having watched them, nothing in it.In my opinion he has a more expansive skillset. Both are good dribblers, but Amad also has great vision and a superior passing range. In my view, Amad is better technically, more creative and is a bigger goal threat too.
Yeah they are quite different in the sense that Pellistri is more likely to play as an old school traditional winger, as opposed to Amad's more modern, playmaker style. Different strokes for different folksOk. I don’t think he’s better technically having watched them, nothing in it.
Different players though (even though both wide/wingers). With the right CF, I think Pellistri would be better cover and give us something different.. a winger who doesn’t cut inside, I like the idea of having variation in a squad.
All opinions though.
Ok. I don’t think he’s better technically having watched them, nothing in it.
Different players though (even though both wide/wingers). With the right CF, I think Pellistri would be better cover and give us something different.. a winger who doesn’t cut inside, I like the idea of having variation in a squad.
All opinions though.
You're correct.Geniune question, who was the last actually effective winger that didn't cut inside?
They don't really exist in the modern game because we aren't playing 442 anymore, you have a lone striker. So whipping in a bunch of aerial crosses from near the corner flag isn't that effective. Plus in most top sides the fullback is that outside crossing threat
That was a genuine assist. How he kept control and possession and then found the angle for the pass. Fantastic skill.
Sensational
Looks like a renaissance painting
Was last night for sure.But but but….he isn’t even sunderland’s best player!!!!
I’d say more like a Baroque painting.Looks like a renaissance painting
And that tells us something about judging a young player too quickly. Let’s hope we build a better environment for our young players to grow into good footballers by being a bit more patient.Was last night for sure.
But hasn't been up til now.
He played well for 50 minutes against a shit Birmingham side, let’s not get too carried away about him doing it for United just yet.And that tells us something about judging a young player too quickly. Let’s hope we build a better environment for our young players to grow into good footballers by being a bit more patient.
Well sorry I don't have a PhD in artI’d say more like a Baroque painting.
Who said anything about him doing it for United. He was being branded a flop for being on loan in the championship at Sunderland and not tearing it up there. So yeah a bit of patience is needed when judging young players.He played well for 50 minutes against a shit Birmingham side, let’s not get too carried away about him doing it for United just yet.
Good point. Has actually had very impactful games against Wolves & Milan for the United first team though. It's obvious he wasn't ready though, and we just need to make sure he can build some consistency - which will come as he gets more actual game experience, and builds strength and intensity which he seems to be doingHe played well for 50 minutes against a shit Birmingham side, let’s not get too carried away about him doing it for United just yet.