didz
Full Member
- Joined
- May 17, 2014
- Messages
- 4,187
Well aren't you a short little focker ey, says the 5'10" person
Forgot how to write that out properly
Well aren't you a short little focker ey, says the 5'10" person
Think you're misunderstanding me. If we sign Frenkie, then there is more hope to make McTominay or Fred work as his partner as kinda the stable support guy who can work like a ball winner, rather than turning them into a playmaker and have their partner be a DM (like Rice, hypothetically). I'm calling it a deep lying playmaker because that's what Frenkie is. We need a midfielder who will pick the ball up off the defenders and start the build up for us. We severely lack in ball progression from the defensive and midfield thirds of the pitch. That's why we need a player like De Jong who will pick the ball up and dictate tempo. Mctominay or Fred as his partner could be OK, as they would no longer have the need to do that, which they struggle with.
Whether that's as a 6 or as an 8, the position on the pitch isn't as important as the role they are assigned. Frenkie likes starting off as the deepest but he for sure would be the less defensive of the 2.
Free agents aren't exactly free, you'd have to pay them all a signing on fee.
My concern with Guendouzi would be the disruption he seems to cause but maybe that’s limited to his relationship with Arteta.I think "other issues" were very much at the forefront there, I also thought he looked great on the occasions I saw him for Arsenal. But he's not really the kind of player we're talking about here I think. Either in terms of type of player or in terms of current level.
The summer that the fans where desperate for us to sign him and many 100% convinced we where going to get him despite the fact there was only vague sources that we were even looking at him and the chances are the whole thing was a fan fantasy with the media trying to cash in on the fans wanting him by creating articles and click bait .....that summer?Remember the summer of Vidal?
The summer that the fans where desperate for us to sign him and many convinced we where going to yet there was only vague sources that we were even looking at him and the chances are the whole thing was a fan fantasy with the media trying to cash in on the fans wanting him .....that summer?
Well at least they got over SniejderYes, word is that one or two muppets are still watching Chilevision
Is Saul Niguez a worthy consideration? I remember him being so highly rated and his move to Chelsea has been a disaster.
Youth. Give our youth player the chance to stake a claim for a place. You always have Fred or Scott to take over if they show they aren’t ready and it’s not as if those two wouldnt play this season anyway.
Loads of people always call for throwing kids in to the teamYouth. Give our youth player the chance to stake a claim for a place. You always have Fred or Scott to take over if they show they aren’t ready and it’s not as if those two wouldnt play this season anyway.
Why not? Give them a chance at least. Is Tielemans or Neves going to be much better?Loads of people always call for throwing kids in to the team
No doubt if we did that and failed to make top 4 Ten Hag would get slaughtered for not making any signings.
Fred, McTominay, and a couple youth players are not going to have us competing with the best teams. Let's be realistic
No way in hell he leaves. Maybe next season if we get CL but he’s destined to join Liverpool since those players are always telling him to come.I'd like us to try for Bellingham if FdJ falls through. They are maybe not that similar in style, but one of the few midfielders I would actually be hyped if we signed. He will probably be very expensive in the £100m+ range though.
He is already at the club, Scott McTominay
Loads of people always call for throwing kids in to the team
No doubt if we did that and failed to make top 4 Ten Hag would get slaughtered for not making any signings.
Fred, McTominay, and a couple youth players are not going to have us competing with the best teams. Let's be realistic
The playing field is very different to other years. City and Liverpool are at the peak of their projects, Chelsea are way ahead of us in their project, Conte's project at Spurs is aggressive and looks promising and you can't totally discount Arsenal. You can have as much faith in the kids as they want but using them plus McFred and a #10 in a pivot CM significantly weakens our top 4 chances as well as Ten Hag's project being successful.Why not? Give them a chance at least. Is Tielemans or Neves going to be much better?
We literally got top 4 two years in a row with McFred in midfield. I don’t think playing talented youngsters beside Eriksen is any worse than that.
I honestly don’t think we can put top 4 on this elite pedestal after one of the worse races for 4th spot we have ever seen last season.
Ten Hag gives the approval to make signings though. He vetoed Pau Torres for Lisandro Martinez and Murtough/Arnold have reportedly done the opposite of Woodward/Jose in 2018 and supported his targets and profiles so if we fail to sign a CM because of a "De Jong or nobody" strategy its on him if we fail to get CL football/Ten Hag doesnt make the signings, its Arnold, Murtough and the legal team, so he wont be slaughtered.
There is nothing wrong with playing academy talent as long as they are mature enough. Its not about age, its about their attitude. ETH is very good at assessing player's capabilties and he has a few tactical approaches, so there is no need to worry about how he deals with the players he has.
I don’t think Chelsea are that far ahead, they only look like a distant third because of how horrible the race for top 4 was. They be seem to be scrambling for players that suggests there isn’t a rebuild to speak of under the new regime. Arsenal (!) were a last 3 game implosion away from overtaking them.The playing field is very different to other years. City and Liverpool are at the peak of their projects, Chelsea are way ahead of us in their project, Conte's project at Spurs is aggressive and looks promising and you can't totally discount Arsenal. You can have as much faith in the kids as they want but using them plus McFred and a #10 in a pivot CM significantly weakens our top 4 chances as well as Ten Hag's project being successful.
There's positions you can gamble with kids like attack and fullbacks but midfield should be the last place to do so especially since it's been a problem for A DECADE
Poor man's PogbaTielemans please, he’d be great for us.
There is an alternative to Frenkie, that's why we've bought Erisken. The alternative is not a single player, but a whole different midfield setup with, maybe, more of a DM at the base and Eriksen and Bruno around him.There is no alternative that is anywhere close to him in terms of ability and that is the problem. If there was, we would have most likely moved on weeks ago.
Yes, I think the plan is to play a midfield three of De Jong, Eriksen and Bruno. The signing of Eriksen is irrelevant to whether De Jong arrives or not.There is an alternative to Frenkie, that's why we've bought Erisken. The alternative is not a single player, but a whole different midfield setup with, maybe, more of a DM at the base and Eriksen and Bruno around him.
Either United pursue FDJ for longer (which I think they're doing), he comes and ETH uses him in a very "functional" ( feck this absolutely cringe football terms) midfield 3 with no stable DM(Eriksen, FDJ, Bruno/DVB/whoever), or he doesn't and ETH will go for a classic DM which is easier to find.
In regards to FDJ's style and quality, I agree, there is no other CM with his traits.
Will be Ruben Neves or Tielemans. Thats who we have been consistently linked to if the FDJ deal was to fall through. Tbf, FDJ is such a one off player that there is no direct replacement for him. Its like getting a replacement for modric at madrid or veratti at psg. Aint going to happen.
Theres a player who just signed for an Italian team who would be great for us if we could play him in his proper position…