All time ODI Draft

@Skills, just to be sure, we get Wellington right ? Since we were the last draw and Wellington was 8th on your list of grounds.
 
Coming Soon
Bond : Homecoming
shane-bond-post_1358501369.jpg
 
Surprised no one went for Sunil Narine. One heck of an average and Econ, even if it was with an illegal action.
Illegal action and currently being banned was the reason we didn't go for him much earlier when he considered him. Wasn't sure how to treat and judge someone who is banned currently, for action, in drafts.
 
Illegal action and currently being banned was the reason we didn't go for him much earlier when he considered him. Wasn't sure how to treat and judge someone who is banned currently, for action, in drafts.
But there are a couple players here who were banned at some stage for an illegal action as well. Couple were questioned over their action over time. Shouldn't they be just as culpable as Narine then ? There has to be some sort of standard/consistency when judging such players. I mean if a player A is treated one way, Player B should not be treated any differently by that same person.
 
But there are a couple players here who were banned at some stage for an illegal action as well. Couple were questioned over their action over time. Shouldn't they be just as culpable as Narine then ? There has to be some sort of standard/consistency when judging such players. I mean if a player A is treated one way, Player B should not be treated any differently by that same person.
Someone like Ajmal is now cleared and I guess he hasn't played much since then and maybe is not as effective. So that could go against the team who picked him. We basically wanted to avoid this unnecessary hassle.
 
But there are a couple players here who were banned at some stage for an illegal action as well. Couple were questioned over their action over time. Shouldn't they be just as culpable as Narine then ? There has to be some sort of standard/consistency when judging such players. I mean if a player A is treated one way, Player B should not be treated any differently by that same person.
Being questioned is different to being definitely caught, tbf. For example, I rate Murali higher because I think he had to struggle through a lot of shit accusations that were thrown at him. I don't rate players who were proven to have suspect actions, or PED abuse for that matter, and haven't proven they can perform at the same standard clean.
 
I thought Graeme hick would be picked. For me he is better than Ian Bell. Also Navjyot Siddhu, Ian Healy
 
Someone like Ajmal is now cleared and I guess he hasn't played much since then and maybe is not as effective. So that could go against the team who picked him. We basically wanted to avoid this unnecessary hassle.
Yeah, after Ajmal was cleared, he changed his action and he has actually struggled ever since. So then how do to judge him.
 
I thought Graeme hick would be picked. For me he is better than Ian Bell. Also Navjyot Siddhu, Ian Healy
Came close to picking Sidhu, but he would never get into the team ahead of Haydos and Stewart (keeping). Thought it was best to pick some player who has an actual chance to get selected.
 
All the grounds I chose from each country in test draft are the ones which have hosted the maximum no. of test matches in that country. I am not responsible if those same stadiums get copied for ODIs too! :D
 
Are we doing the winner to take one from opposite team thing?