Cutch
Full Member
you dont rate Emerson? Im pretty sure Riquelme wouldn't be able to do his magic against that midfield trio....
Riquelme will tear Emerson a new one. I'm pretty sure he's done well 2-3 times against him in internationals
you dont rate Emerson? Im pretty sure Riquelme wouldn't be able to do his magic against that midfield trio....
Emerson would struggle with Riquelme imo. Riquelme is great on the ball, but his passing is what makes him so dangerous. Here he's freed up because of the 3 hard working midfielders behind him. Riquelme would split that defence with Mexes covering the space Signal leaves when pushing up.
The benefit of us having Hierro is that when we need a quick counter, he can bypass the midfield completely If necessary and Charles would win the majority (if not all) headers to knock it down to Sivori and Riquelme.
Not to mention Emerson is a bit tenacious and clumsy at times. With him and Mexes, there's likely to be a few free kicks. Riquelme is a bit of a dead ball specialist, and Charles, Hierro, etc are a handful from corners and free kicks.
there is a reason why Riquelme never shined at the biggest stage, the modern game is to quick for him and he needs time and space to do his magic and in the modern game you cant walk around the pitch and only rely on your talent, well you can if you are Messi but humans cant. He will be against 3 hard working midfielders who are very good defensively and i think he would struggle.
Saying than, i like what i see from Sivori, the right type of player and if you got it right with the other 2 you are a clear winner in my book.
@Šjor Bepo tag didn't work in the post above.
Best player in the 2006 World Cup by a mile before Pekerman made 1 of the worst decisions of all time in the quarters
Why tag me? Leave me alone . Oh and I think I disagree with the dead-ringer thing anyway.
Always annoys me. Have no idea how to make that inverted ^ so have to go hunting for a post of his and copy paste the name.
Don't complain if no one writes to you Sjor.
You can tag him without using the inverted ^. Just write @ sjo and the menu to select him shows up.Always annoys me. Have no idea how to make that inverted ^ so have to go hunting for a post of his and copy paste the name.
Always annoys me. Have no idea how to make that inverted ^ so have to go hunting for a post of his and copy paste the name.
Don't complain if no one writes to you Sjor.
Yeah it's a bit shit that there was a discussion about not doing tactics/formations by committee...But here we are.
I apologize for that. I usually post that and did so this time without thinking. Took it down immediately after Aldo pointed out, but there's that!
thats one tournament, his career is the total opposite of his reputation. The fact is, he was not that good when you consider everything. The talent is obvious and he was a lovely player to watch but he didnt proved himself at the highest stage for longer period at club level because he isnt suited for modern game. If he was born few decades before im pretty sure we would talk about him as one of the best number 10 in history.
Not much wrong with that. However, if we look at their peaks here.
- Andriy Shevchenko in his Balon d'or winning form leads the line. A complete striker he is proven goal scorer himself and is versatile with excellent hold up play to bring Kalle and Totti, fantastic goal scorers themselves into the play.
- 2 x European Footballer of the Year, 'Kalle' Rummenigge plays in his favourite position having a free role playing behind Shevchenko. Having played on the Right Wing for Germany, he'll be deadly in stretching the defence and finding spaces to exploit. With Shevchenko ahead and Totti behind him, his pace and movement will cause havoc in any kind of opposition defence. Additionally he has his favourite midfielder, the other half of Breitnigge operating behind him.
I don't hold it against you...everyone has been doing it for so long it just becomes habit to draft your team and put it up to see what everyone thinks. It just annoyed me more since I found myself down 7 votes to 1 at one point which wouldn't have happened if you had your Totti brainfart
(and tbh, I was still confused how the scoreline was like that anyway!)
7-1? Never noticed that! It's 9-6 now and you are catching up faster. These early leads count for less as I predict this would go down the wire.
So I actually have the more prolific goal scorers, and they're up against the weaker defence overall, and by far the weakest player on the field in Mexes.
As usual Skizzo just keeps harping on Mexes hoping people would ignore his shortcomings everywhere else
One, From what I read Pirri was a Centre Midfielder in the mould of Effenberg or Keane, a good box-to-box player. I certainly don;t think he can pay the pivot for a diamond letting Del Sol and Lucha free. I would reckon it's the same as playing Keane there, can do a decent job, but certainly not even close to peak performance. Emerson is a far better fit there and would be much more influential in this game.
Two, Riquelme for all his talent was a classic case of a player who never reached his potential. He has always been there, never reached anywhere close to his peak in Europe. If we go by talent and you tube passing compliations, he'll be there...But in terms of CAREER PEAK, he's a couple of levels below the rest of attackers on the pitch
Three, I would rate my midfielders ahead of him going by career peaks. Breitner has a incredible scoring ratio for a midfielder and my opponent's team has nothing remotely similar to the one-two punch of Breitnigge. They were devastating duo for Bayern at their peak and even discounting Shevchenko and Totti, a handful by themselves. I have a far superior attack.
Four, for all the harping on my defence, both my full backs are better than his. He has an advantage in Central defensive pairing, but I have a clear advantage in the flanks.
I can't believe I'm actually thinking about voting against Breitnigge
It's all true, and as my first post here regarding the match I agreed with all of these(well Riquelme-Totti is arguable depends on style so I won't necessarily agree on it).You can't. Mexes may not be in the league, but he is not a defensive liability.
- My strikers equal if not better to his.
- My midfield is definitely better. (Totti > Riquelme | Pirri not a pivot DM, so Emerson will have a better game)
- My full backs will influence the game far more than his.
Totti ignored from the equation?
The brilliance of Breitnigge (and their goal exploits) do not count?
Totti's career peak is comfortably above Riquelme and he'll definitely have a significant edge.
Pirri is not a pivot DM and so Emerson will have much better day containing Riquelme than Pirri with Totti.
Apart from central defensive pair, I'm equal or comfortably better everywhere else on the pitch!
Thinking about it some more I'm going for Skizzo 2-1.
The main reason is Skizz's defence is a lot better than EAP's and Emerson, who I actually think is very underrated will have his hands full with Riquelme; Pirri will do a better job on Totti than Emerson on Riquelme. Great vid @antohan Makelele sure resorts to fouling a lot against him.
Another minor quibble with EAP is that Shevchenko is better with a proper #9 although it is mitigated by Totti bursting forward too.
If Skizz can get some full-backs who can attack better he could go far indeed.
Not ignoring Totti from the equation at all. I was comparing the front two, in which I have a proven partnership. You keep mentioning how you have this one-two punch...so do i, and it's more prolific than yours, and up against the weaker defence.
Totti has scored 243 career goals to Riquelme's 123. Clear edge? Well, no. Totti has been the main man for his team, Riquelme would often get shunted to different positions. Totti has made almost 100 more appearances, but about 85 of his goals were penalties. Again, Riquelme not the liability you try to point out. He'd be quite comfortable pulling the strings and getting by Emerson here.
Pirri is more than comfortable in the position he's in. Totti is hardly a workhorse who's gonna be zipping all over the field anyway. He'll be looking to pull the strings for you, but he'll struggle against one of Spain's greatest ever midfielders...and with that world class defence in front of the best keeper in the draft.
And it doesn't matter if we're equal in most places on the pitch...the fact is that Mexes is a HUGE liability in an all time draft against top tier opponents here.
I think you overrate your midfielders. Both Del Sol and Lucha lean towards attack. Del Sol was even in the attacking 5 of a 2-3-5 during his career with Real Madrid. Pirri is the only real box-to-box midfielder you have and you have stuck him in a pivot DM role. I would definitely disagree Pirri would be anywhere close to his peak in that role. DM in a 4-2-3-1, I can buy, but at base of a diamond...certainly not.
The career stats are just confusing the voters. Riquleme in his 'peak' had a 17 goals from 46 games, certainly not close to Totti (20 from 32 games or 32 from 50 games). He never lived upto his peak and certainly will have lesser impact than Totti here.
Di Stefano exalts Del Sol because his ability of running till the bottom of the pitch and his huge and untiring capacity to carry out the distribution of the game.
His polyvalence was his main attribute, but he was also a gifted player, with an incredible stamina and team work, as well as a special scoring abilities, considering that he was not a "forward" player, although he could easily leave his defensive tasks to become a more offensive player in seconds.
Totti often played as a false 9 or a 9.5, especially in his heaviest goalscoring seasons. Riquelme was always a classic 10. In terms of impact you have to consider that Totti is up against Pirri, while Riquelme is up against Emerson.The career stats are just confusing the voters. Riquleme in his 'peak' had a 17 goals from 46 games, certainly not close to Totti (20 from 32 games or 32 from 50 games). He never lived upto his peak and certainly will have lesser impact than Totti here.
The maddening fact of the matter is it's almost impossible to predict which version of Mexes is going to appear in a given match. Good Mexes can be a decent contributor; bad Mexes is a red card or mistake waiting to happen.
Unfortunately, bad Mexes seems to be the one we see most often...
The hothead veteran defender has a penchant to be reckless with his challenges, evident from his 31 fouls committed from 88 tackles and aerial duels. He picked up nine yellow cards and one red card last season in just 18 league starts too, and was guilty of some costly errors leading to goals.
With Mexes largely a regular in the defence, Milan have conceded 99 goals in the last two seasons, finishing 8th (2013/14) and 10th (2014/15) for their troubles. It’s miles away from where the side want to be in the Serie A, and as a result supporters were expecting the under-performing stars to be released.
One player who has probably caused fans the most pain is also a symbol of the team's recent defensive inadequacies.
Philippe Mexes has proved to be a poor successor to Milan's long line of excellent center-backs. When compared to Franco Baresi, Billy Costacurta, Alessandro Nesta and Paolo Maldini, the Frenchman seems grossly inadequate.
Mexes has been a Milan player since 2011. Since his arrival, he's played in 81 Serie A games and received 30 yellow cards. That's a whopping 37 percent of his games. This past season, he started 18 games and got booked in half of them.
His tendency to lose his cool goes beyond bookings. In each of the last two campaigns Mexes has been handed lengthy suspensions for doing something completely stupid.
Totti often played as a false 9 or a 9.5, especially in his heaviest goalscoring seasons. Riquelme was always a classic 10. In terms of impact you have to consider that Totti is up against Pirri, while Riquelme is up against Emerson.
Just so we are aware how out of his depth Mexes is here...
I've made this point earlier. Pirri was a box-to-box midfielder from every article I've read. Definitely not a fit for the base of the diamond. It's akin to playing Keane or Effenberg at the base of a diamong. Can do a job, but nowhere near their peak. Emerson will have a better time with Riquelme, than Pirri with Totti. Totti has the penchant for drifting all over the final third (and is comfortable out wide too) and Pirri would have a much tougher ask to track him all over.
Secondly, his full backs won't offer much support in going forward as mine. For a diamond, it is a crucial part to making the formation work and DelSol/Lucha will have a tough time holding the middle and providing width.
For me, yeah they are against good defenders, but Sagnol-Breitner-Kalle and Brehme-Effenberg-Totti are far better link up's and will definitely lead to plenty of goals.
Definitely needs DMF as secondary position as he played on this position very often, especially during the 1970s
Pirri played the most important part of his career as a DMF