Should old crimes not be investigated?
Some investigation you got going there. Hope you can crack the case.
Should old crimes not be investigated?
He's very unlikely to agree to a paycut (who in the world would?) so we should do the smart thing and sell him for no fee and cover like 25% of his remaining wages. People may baulk at that but 1) We got him for free 2) We'd really be saving 75% of his wages vs now for a player who doesn't contribute.
Given his touch and lack of pace when he was here I sincerely doubt he'll be able to replicate much at United. Time to cut our losses I feel.
What a wind up post.
Hope the mods are watching!
We will see, but inter will definitely sign him.I disagree, it’s not in United’s best interest to retain his services and not play him, he’s going to be loaned regardless and play wherever his is loaned. The amount of people who think it’d be fine taking a 30/40% pay cut is all good astounds me. He’s wanting to bank as much cash as possible, as this is his retirement fund. Why on earth would he reduce his earning power? Unless he gets a longer contract on lower wages, there is no actual benefit to him. He can do an Ozil at the end of the day if he so wishes.
Some investigation you got going there. Hope you can crack the case.
We didn't get him for free. We got him for player valued 35mil €. Plus fee to him, his agent etc....He's very unlikely to agree to a paycut (who in the world would?) so we should do the smart thing and sell him for no fee and cover like 25% of his remaining wages. People may baulk at that but 1) We got him for free 2) We'd really be saving 75% of his wages vs now for a player who doesn't contribute.
Given his touch and lack of pace when he was here I sincerely doubt he'll be able to replicate much at United. Time to cut our losses I feel.
We didn't get him for free. We got him for player valued 35mil €. Plus fee to him, his agent etc....
I disagree about selling him for free and especially paying part of his wage.
Sanchez still can be useful. If we can't sell him then he should stay. He can play all positions in attack and he is still good player so can be useful. He is still better than all our backup options.
We didn't get him for free. We got him for player valued 35mil €. Plus fee to him, his agent etc....
I disagree about selling him for free and especially paying part of his wage.
Sanchez still can be useful. If we can't sell him then he should stay. He can play all positions in attack and he is still good player so can be useful. He is still better than all our backup options.
I agree. But why to lose more money on him? Selling should be priority. But between selling him for free or paying part of his wage and keeping him, i would keep him450k for player to sit on bench who will have significant impact on all our future contracts and signings. He isn't good enough to justify paying 450k per week.
I agree. But why to lose more money on him? Selling should be priority. But between selling him for free or paying part of his wage and keeping him, i would keep him
We will lose even more money by keeping him. Every player will want huge wages thanks to Sanchez.
I agree. But why to lose more money on him? Selling should be priority. But between selling him for free or paying part of his wage and keeping him, i would keep him
I have never understood this notion Sanchez got the wages he got due to his contract situation good luck to other players getting those wages why De Gea huge wages aren't making other players ask for pay rise .Teams would always pay top wages to top players unfortunately ours flopped but that doesn't give excuse to other players to demand parity with them .
I have never understood this notion Sanchez got the wages he got due to his contract situation good luck to other players getting those wages why De Gea huge wages aren't making other players ask for pay rise .Teams would always pay top wages to top players unfortunately ours flopped but that doesn't give excuse to other players to demand parity with them .
It’s not even fair to compare Sanchez and De Gea contracts. One of them have been here for 10 years being POTY 2 times and carried the team for most parts.I have never understood this notion Sanchez got the wages he got due to his contract situation good luck to other players getting those wages why De Gea huge wages aren't making other players ask for pay rise .Teams would always pay top wages to top players unfortunately ours flopped but that doesn't give excuse to other players to demand parity with them .
Yes agreed Clubs have wage structures club thought Sanchez would be worth the wages and we could absorb that, but he failed we move on.Eh? There is a reason why clubs have wage structure and don't break them.
It doesn't matter whether they think De Gea or Sanchez deserve it or not what matters is whether they deserve the wages they are asking for and can they get similar wages elsewhere.It’s not even fair to compare Sanchez and De Gea contracts. One of them have been here for 10 years being POTY 2 times and carried the team for most parts.
The other one have done nothing at this club and are on higher wages with no resale value at all. At least De Gea been a very good servant to this club.
I don’t think other players look at De Gea contract and think he dosent deserve it. Sanchez on the other hand...
Yes agreed Clubs have wage structures club thought Sanchez would be worth the wages and we could absorb that, but he failed we move on.
He didn't impact our wage bill beyond his own if players demand higher wages due to him it's simply not gonna work because they need to be able to show they are worth those wages and they can get similar wages else where as well , It seems Herrera tried we called his bluff and he left , our biggest issue has been overpaying middling talents hopefully we are moving away from that.
It doesn't matter whether they think De Gea or Sanchez deserve it or not what matters is whether they deserve the wages they are asking for and can they get similar wages elsewhere.
See, that’s the problem. Sanchez didn’t deserve his wages. Therefore other players will demand the same.It doesn't matter whether they think De Gea or Sanchez deserve it or not what matters is whether they deserve the wages they are asking for and can they get similar wages elsewhere.
He hated being here though and his lack of workrate and endeavour was there for all to see. And that's before we even begin to consider how much of a disruptive influence he was as well (high wages + low contribution, fight with Greenwood, etc) he would be setting the squad rebuild back if he came.We didn't get him for free. We got him for player valued 35mil €. Plus fee to him, his agent etc....
I disagree about selling him for free and especially paying part of his wage.
Sanchez still can be useful. If we can't sell him then he should stay. He can play all positions in attack and he is still good player so can be useful. He is still better than all our backup options.
We can say that Sanchez showed lots of (bad) things when he played but low work rate was not one of them.He hated being here though and his lack of workrate and endeavour was there for all to see. And that's before we even begin to consider how much of a disruptive influence he was as well (high wages + low contribution, fight with Greenwood, etc) he would be setting the squad rebuild back if he came.
Nah, because even if we have to pay up part of his wages, we'll be freeing up wages to help us pay for other players. Right now we're in a situation where a 400k player isn't contributing. I would rather have a 200k player not contributing. Those 200k could be used for say Sancho.I agree. But why to lose more money on him? Selling should be priority. But between selling him for free or paying part of his wage and keeping him, i would keep him
Always did think Center Forward was his best position.
Not big enough for Mou.We really should have tried him there more when we were struggling.
You think? what did he do that was so good apart from missing a 1v1? not surprised he got subbed for Lautaro who scored.Played well tonight. Interested to see who you loan him to next season (I assume Inter won't be able to afford him full time).
Point is?Ever since Sanchez joined with his *bumper golden contract* Jan 2018
New contracts
+ Rojo March 2018
+ *rumours of Pogba and De Gea with their agents wanted new improved contracts* March-July 2018
+ Shaw *bumper contract* October 2018
+ Martial *bumper contract* Jan 2019
+ Jones Feb 2019
- Herrera *requested bumper contract, rejected* left on free transfer June 2019
+ Mata *still a bumper contract* June 2019
+ Rashford *bumper contract* July 2019
+ Pereira July 2019
+ Maguire *bumper contract* Aug 2019
+ De Gea *bumper golden contract* September 2019
+ McT June 2020
+ Matic July 2020