strandty
Full Member
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2007
- Messages
- 1,845
The so called experts on twitter know next to nothing...the only details you can trust are that MacAllister is moving to Liverpool.
Exactly. The more reliable sources are claiming 55m.
The so called experts on twitter know next to nothing...the only details you can trust are that MacAllister is moving to Liverpool.
I would have been happy with him at £55m tbfWhy weren’t we all over this? 35million for a young, premier league proven World Cup winner. Steal that is.
SSN also reporting "could be worth £55m".
What sort of idiots put a 35 mill release clause in a contract? And what sort of idiots dont bid for him at 35 mill!
That's absolutely ridiculous we were not in at that price. Ridiculous.
We have no clue do we ? For that price we should have 100% tried to get him. Massive upgrade on the likes of Fred/mctom
That's absolutely ridiculous we were not in at that price. Ridiculous.
I think he just wanted to go to Liverpool.
Good deal. Lidl Modric is a good player. But I feel Mount is rather what Liverpool need while Lidl Modric would have worked better for us.
You can say that againOuch I fear you are right
If it is 35m£35m is excellent business.
In what world are they comparable?Shades of them signing Minamino and the Caf berating United on why we didn’t sign him instead
If it's 35 million or the player is not signing then it's 35 million really isn't it? Brighton didn't have a lot of leverage in that situation.I find it hard to believe Brighton would agree terms on a 35m release clause when they renewed terms in October 2022
I mean under their structure it literally appears they don't particularly give a shit and have the next one lined up anyway.If it's 35 million or the player is not signing then it's 35 million really isn't it? Brighton didn't have a lot of leverage in that situation.
I'm not saying it is 35 because I don't know but the point is Brighton were really just covering their ass at that point and McAllister would have probably only wanted to sign a deal with a lot of scope for him to leave.
I'm sure they probably do care about the potential to bring in money for their star players. That's kind of the model as well. But the players obviously have different agenda's for their career and they got into a sticky situation with McAllister where it probably wasn't the ideal contract or agreement they would like to have.I mean under their structure it literally appears they don't particularly give a shit and have the next one lined up anyway.
But as usual, Liverpool appear to have bagged another incredibly reasonable deal.
Let's not pretend this is some transformative signing for Liverpool. He's nothing more than a steady squad option. He would not be a guaranteed starter for any of the top three clubs. The Athletic are reporting the fee as over £45m, which is a fair fee if McTominay is going for roughly £35m.
Sounds like a pitch given to Woodward when he agreed to pay 80m for MaguireI'm sure they probably do care about the potential to bring in money for their star players. That's kind of the model as well. But the players obviously have different agenda's for their career and they got into a sticky situation with McAllister where it probably wasn't the ideal contract or agreement they would like to have.
It's alright having this fantastic scouting network and analytics but you do need to be able to continually make a profit on players to reinvest and ensure the club remains financially healthy, and also potentially get to the next level by taking that money and spreading it around.
If you're just losing them on frees or breaking even on the time you spent identifying and investing in the playing time of these players before they're quite so good, eventually you are probably going to head backwards through standing still. It only takes getting a few wrong and you've created a system with little margin for error without that cash surplus.
Sounds like a pitch given to Woodward when he agreed to pay 80m for Maguire
People seem to forget that clubs can and will get in touch with agents to sound out a player's interest in a move, and just assume that if we'd made a bid and offered him a contract, we'd have gotten him instead.On what basis are you saying we weren’t in for him?
SSN also reporting "could be worth £55m".