Forevergiggs1
Full Member
TBH it is hard to work out exactly what went on. I'm definitely not fretting over it but to me it sounds like we could of had Bruno for 50m in the summer refused to pay and ended up paying the 16m extra when we went back in for him in January.Read his quotes instead of the fluff around it.
“I realised in the negotiations that was convinced that we were going to give in and that for €50m he was doing the deal. Well they ended up paying 65 million.
“They were wrong and ended up paying what we wanted. We went to get 20 million more than if we had sold four months ago.”
He's blatantly saying that we were offering about €50m and they refused it, then we came back in January and gave them the €65m that they were originally asking. The €20m figure is the rough difference (65m minus 50m is only 15m so obviously the figures aren't exact) between what he would have been accepting if he accepted our original offer and what he got by sticking to his guns and refusing to accept anything under their asking price. The media then spun that to say that we could have got him for €45-50m in the summer, which is actually the exact opposite of what he's saying.
The VP did say we went to get 20m more for him than if we sold him in the summer. Meaning he was for sale in the summer for 50m but there were no takers. That's my take on it anyway.