SalfordRed18
Netflix and avocado, no chill
Are you a Sevilla fan?Have to say it's hard to believe we are covering 100pc of his wages.
Are you a Sevilla fan?Have to say it's hard to believe we are covering 100pc of his wages.
We are covering 0% of his wages...Have to say it's hard to believe we are covering 100pc of his wages.
Ah, the title 'all wages covered' isn't clear. Sounds more like united are from thatWe are covering 0% of his wages...
Where do you think I got the idea. Jesus the reading comprehensionBecause we aren't maybe?
Still don't understand the point of his signing
I doubt he was a “purchase by Ole”.We really are the worst club at recruiting Brazilians. All of ours tend to be shite.
This was a poor purchase by Ole if we're being honest. Looking at his style of play he was never going to be a good fit in the PL.
Yeah. Initially people were happy to overlook his defensive frailties on account of his looking decent going forward and ability to take a free kick. Sadly those qualities seemed to disappear before long.We needed cover for Shaw and thought that he would be a bit better than he was. It made sense, though.
With both Phelan and Telles gone who the hell is going to put the cones out?
Wouldn't trust him to do that without spraining his ankleJones
I doubt he was a “purchase by Ole”.
I reckon his agent (or maybe Porto) gave Ed a call, pointed out that Shaw was great but unreliable, and they had just the right player to be his backup.
Indeed. I think that if a manager really wanted a player the club would (within reason; e.g. not in Jose’s final summer) try their best to get him.As we learnt from ETH, I don't think previous managers had the final say in as far as transfers go
Indeed. I think that if a manager really wanted a player the club would (within reason; e.g. not in Jose’s final summer) try their best to get him.
I strongly believe that fans massively underestimate the role of agents and selling clubs in creating a market for players though, and a club with a weak scouting/footballing infrastructure is going to get taken advantage of.
I reckon we haven’t done anything like enough in the window so far. That said, the big positive I’m taking away from it is that we’ve signed players that someone at United (regardless of who) actually wants, rather than ones that someone else (agent or selling club) wants to re-home.
Another strange signing which summed up the Ole and Woodward era!In the end, not quick enough and not good enough at defending.
Well I don’t doubt that much of that goes on. I think Arsenal have admitted that someone involved in their transfers had been, er, not acting in the best interests of the club. The ludicrous Pepe fee brought that to light, I think.Also makes you wonder how much of the United tax really are brown envelopes.
Well I don’t doubt that much of that goes on. I think Arsenal have admitted that someone involved in their transfers had been, er, not acting in the best interests of the club. The ludicrous Pepe fee brought that to light, I think.
The Bebe deal is well known, and the “three for one” when Raiola managed to get Ed to take Zlatan and Mkhitaryan off his hands alongside Pogba seemed to escape raised eyebrows amid an orgy of muppetry. I doubt if anyone inside United has actually benefited personally though; they’ve been gullible idiots rather than crooks.
This is the sort of thing that can happen when you’ve got remote owners who aren’t really interested in the day to day detail.Lets hope so. Otherwise, it is difficult to explain some of the stupid transfer pricing, especially those huge agent fees.
This is the sort of thing that can happen when you’ve got remote owners who aren’t really interested in the day to day detail.
Maybe it’s significant that the Glazers, having initially been really hands-off, started to demand all decisions being run past them and expenditure requiring sign-off. I’d always assumed this was just because they had got fed up with Ed spaffing “their” cash on a load of overpriced duds. Maybe it was more than that and they suspected something?
Excellent post! I used to be a director of a company that made equipment for the global oil and gas industry; “compliance” (a great euphemism for not being bent) was a total nightmare…If you look at the org structure of United, Woodward had a lot of power & control within his hands and therefore the lack of accountability. He resisted organisational changes (like getting a DOF) and let organisational chaos fester.
Its the perfect environmet for brown envelopes. I have also worked in far too many countries where you require to slip incentives to get a deal or even to get paid. You develop a sense of who you can work with after a while.
We paid between 20-30million quid annually to agents. Woodward's trusted mate Matt Judge was appointed by Woodward to negotiate. I am sure there has been a case or two but how many bargains or value for money deals did we get over the last 10 years? And yet we consistently over the odds for players that we bigger 'brands' than they were better fit -- and the same time paid over 20+ million quid every year to agents.
Makes you wonder. Getting a DOF would have at least ensured that we have better fit of players and consistent playing style. Instead it was like a pendulum swing from one end to another. The chaos was just opportunities for the unaccountable madness that is/was United under Woodward.
If you look at the org structure of United, Woodward had a lot of power & control within his hands and therefore the lack of accountability. He resisted organisational changes (like getting a DOF) and let organisational chaos fester.
Its the perfect environmet for brown envelopes. I have also worked in far too many countries where you require to slip incentives to get a deal or even to get paid. You develop a sense of who you can work with after a while.
We paid between 20-30million quid annually to agents. Woodward's trusted mate Matt Judge was appointed by Woodward to negotiate. I am sure there has been a case or two but how many bargains or value for money deals did we get over the last 10 years? And yet we consistently over the odds for players that we bigger 'brands' than they were better fit -- and the same time paid over 20+ million quid every year to agents.
Makes you wonder. Getting a DOF would have at least ensured that we have better fit of players and consistent playing style. Instead it was like a pendulum swing from one end to another. The chaos was just opportunities for the unaccountable madness that is/was United under Woodward.
Excellent post! I used to be a director of a company that made equipment for the global oil and gas industry; “compliance” (a great euphemism for not being bent) was a total nightmare…
I reckon in Ed’s case it was all about ego rather than personal gain. But yes you’re absolutely right; there will always be those who will be ready to take advantage of such a rotten environment.
Oh definitely. I’m not letting them off the hook at all.Glazers have to shoulder the blame as much as Woodward here. Woodward was merely the executioner of Glazer's mission. If Galzer mission was to "Continue to be the biggest football club by playing the best football", perhaps he'd have approached things differently. Instead, our mission was "Be the biggest marketable brand, grow revenue from all angles and maximize dividend payout". Woodward executed that mission well.
I dunno; I’m not sure he has “that” sort of ego. Not the arrogant kind.But his ego probably told him -- that a well-educated, talented guy, making hundreds of millions if not billions in shareholder value (such as himself) should not be paid less than plebs/kids who barely have any GCSEs never mind a university degree and CPA qualifications like himself.
To be fair Dani Alves is goingInteresting. Must be playing decent at Sevilla to get into the squad?