- Joined
- May 13, 2009
- Messages
- 1,334
Losing Russo (and Batlle) is a big blow. Hurts our chances and I’m not confident we’ll replace them this window.
Lauren James going to Chelsea always felt an inevitability to me, right from when we signed her in 2018, so her going was not a surprise. Russo leaving hurts more with the personal connection and feels like it could have been avoided if we were serious with negotiations from the off.I am so sad about this. So depressing irrespective of why it happened. It’s mad to me that we had Lauren James & Russo and somehow we have ended up keeping neither
You compare a regular job at some company to a newly founded football club that is trying to build a sustainable way of operating the womens team? The stress about the situation? Russo was speaking to 10 clubs and offering her services to the highest bidder via her brother who acted as her agent. How is that stressful? You did not counter what I wrote in my post, you just ignored it and are writing it off like United should have just handed her the best contract in the league before the clubs structure was in place for that. Not even sure if she would be worth paying that much for her football contributions alone either tbh.
Was it perfectly handled by the club? No. Would Russo still be here if she really loved Man United, yes.
Jayde was signed already to replace Ona imo.Losing Russo (and Batlle) is a big blow. Hurts our chances and I’m not confident we’ll replace them this window.
I've worked at start-ups, one that is now valued significantly more than Manchester United in fact. That's how the real world works, it's a job, of course she's going to see what her current market rate is, most high level professionals will interview now and again to see where they currently stand even if they don't really plan on leaving. Yes, it is stressful when you don't know where you'll be or where you'll be located in a few months. If someone is willing to pay you £x and your contract is running down and you tell who you are working for that fact and they feck around for 18 months and then match it at the end then they find out. No hard feelings about it, I've been on the flip side and I'd never really expect such a late matching offer to be accepted.
She might have agreed to join Arsenal ages ago, because she did not hear anything from us on an improved offer. Then we have paniced. Some people do not like going back on their word. The club should not play on somebody supporting the club to short change them.18 months ago Russo was returning from long term injury and had very little value in terms of what she had proved on the pitch, so thats the reason the club did not hand her a Maradona contract from the get go.Then she broke through with England and her value sky rocketed. I think she is not worth what she will be getting for what she gave us on the pitch. But maybe that Arsenal all star team will pimp up her stats. Lets hope not for our sake.
Anyway, I see your point of view, I dont agree completely, we´ll just have to agree to disagree.
Were we getting her along with a fee. Would we now have to find a fee for her from somewhere?If she does go to Arsenal, would Blackstenius be an option to replace her? I’m sure that was the proposal in January, and we were linked with her before she joined Arsenal.
The way the sub was been made last year even when Russo was having a good game, I think Rachel Williams is the plan for a starting number 9 role. Can unfortunately see a few more leaving this summer…
She’s not the plan. Rach came in for experience, she’s not down to be a regular starter.The way the sub was been made last year even when Russo was having a good game, I think Rachel Williams is the plan for a starting number 9 role. Can unfortunately see a few more leaving this summer…
Greenwood, Groenen and James were sold though, right?
Securing top 3 was more important than getting a few hundred thousand.Don't follow this closely, but saw the bbc article.
Is there any reason United turned down world record bids and now are losing her for free?
Aside from dreadful transfer strategy?
Don't follow this closely, but saw the bbc article.
Is there any reason United turned down world record bids and now are losing her for free?
Aside from dreadful transfer strategy?
There was also the timing of the bid. It was the last day of the transfer window. Even if we’d wanted to cash in and use the money for a replacement that was to late.There are quite a few:
Letting Russo leave in january to a direct rival for the domestic title and champions league places would have been a disaster. It would likely have meant us missing top 3 and also sending a clear message that United are a selling club. to be fair we were only 2 blatant penalty snubs by the refs away at Chelsea from winning the title. And also deserved to win the FA-cup final.
The club was probably confident they would reach and agreement with her and also focused on keeping the title bid going! If we had sold Russo in january there would have been a riot among fans.
I dont blame the club for that decision in the slightest! The club obviously was not in Russos head though to know what was brewing there!
We did qualify for the champions league and our reputation should be on the ups to get proper replacement in place for Russo!
Why is russo leaving on a free when we turned down good money last year?
Did I read somewhere, Earps might be off too? This club cant be sold soon enough! We are haemorrhaging our best players each season when we are on the verge of something. We are not a serious club atm
Did I read somewhere, Earps might be off too? This club cant be sold soon enough! We are haemorrhaging our best players each season when we are on the verge of something. We are not a serious club atm
Yeah, an appropriate parting gift from the Glazers.It's a complete joke. Shambolic management of the whole situation and I bet we act as slowly as possible to replace her as well. Pathetic from the club.
Oh no, Batlle too? I hadn’t heard. That’s fecking terrible.Losing Russo (and Batlle) is a big blow. Hurts our chances and I’m not confident we’ll replace them this window.
We are still a level below. She joined a club that wanted to break the transfer record to sign her and are happy to invest in their success. United have shown very little ambition here and are losing all their best players as a result.This is worse than Greenwood for me because at least at that point we were a level below but no real reason to leave now
I see she's gone full Herrera with a big speech about how it was a dream to play for United blah blah blah.
"I love the club, that's why I'm leaving".
Reports suggest that United were willing to back her wage demands.We are still a level below. She joined a club that wanted to break the transfer record to sign her and are happy to invest in their success. United have shown very little ambition here and are losing all their best players as a result.
We’re lucky that we had an option to extend with Earps but she’ll be on her way for a free transfer next season unless we get our act together.
Of course Russos camp is going to drop hints to the media to say she wanted to stay and that the club failed her. Thats PR from them to keep the backslash from United fans down and make sure she does not lose followers on instagram etc. Its all about taking care of the brand that ensures she makes money.
Ye the PR video she puts out with pics of her as a girl in United kits, talking about living her dreams scoring at OT etc just makes it worse
Anyway will reserve full judgement until her new club is confirmed
They only came in with that offer really late after they realized she might leave.Reports suggest that United were willing to back her wage demands.
Where's the lack of ambition from United here exactly?
That's usually how negotiations work, no difference anywhere else.They only came in with that offer really late after they realized she might leave.
You have one club giving her the contract she wants as soon as possible and tries to break the transfer record to get her and any other dilly dallying until the last minute without prioritizing it properly. On top of that, she’s not the only one we’re losing on a free here. I think it’s a fair criticism.
If they were competent and really prioritized keeping her, they would at least have an idea of what’s in her head. This screams of ineptitude and a lack of proper prioritization. They had 18 months of negotiation and chose to put the offer in the table at the very end when it was far too late - no way that was good negotiation tactics considering the outcome.That's usually how negotiations work, no difference anywhere else.
She could have stayed if she wanted too, this isn't on the club, it's on her.
Would it have been good negotiation tactics had she signed?If they were competent and really prioritized keeping her, they would at least have an idea of what’s in her head. This screams of ineptitude and a lack of proper prioritization. They had 18 months of negotiation and chose to put the offer in the table at the very end when it was far too late - no way that was good negotiation tactics considering the outcome.
Hard to say. They’ve been at the table for 18 months so they left it too late anyway I think. As soon as she scored that back heel goal it should have been dealt with in my view.Would it have been good negotiation tactics had she signed?
Let’s agree to disagree then. I think it got there too late and the delay cost us a player who I believe would have stayed on if we put it on the table earlier.Again, this isn't on the club at all, this is solely on the player.
She could have stayed, decided not too. The clubs offer was on on the table, irrespective of when it got there.