ThanksBoss26
Full Member
I know no club tends to start with their best offer but as opening bids go, that’s pathetic.
I thought it was a max of 5 years?
Same as Arsenal and Liverpool. This was also us 15 years ago. People paid premium just because you’re associated with Manchester United. Now it’s the opposite.Yeah, and have you seen how much City get for academy players who rarely play and are permanent loanees?
If we sell him and then replace him with that underwhelming French lad I’ll be really pissed off.
Honestly if we sell a 20 year old with his statistics to his name already we'd be insane.
The clubs going backwards fast.
Its in the name, people.Why are people believing an "exclusive" story by Alfred Pedulla? When was the last time he broke an exclusive that turned out to be correct?
To my limited understanding, It's just how transfers are amortised. In theory if you received 60 Million you could spend up to 5x that amount depending on the length of contract for the incoming players.Yeah @Berbaclass said this. Where's it from?
It is 5 yeah.I thought it was a max of 5 years?
I'd snap someone's hand off for £70 million that would be incredible for our rebuild. Would allow us to spend up to like £300-350 million.I wouldn't even sell him for £70M tbh.
Better than Garnacho, are you having a laugh?There's no point in selling him, we won't be able to afford anyone better.
Teams are aware of how bad our finances are.We should refuse to negotiate any further after such a derisory offer.
When would you guys realise our issues are more related to actual cash rather than just PSR , So irrespective of how much we get for Garnacho we aren't spending £300-350 million .I'd snap someone's hand off for £70 million that would be incredible for our rebuild. Would allow us to spend up to like £300-350 million.
Really hope we don't sell him. If the situation was reversed, they would ask for 75m. We should be getting rid of Eriksen, Casemiro, Rashford, Malacia, Lindelof etc.
I'm fully aware of that. There are issues with both. I was just stating how it could work in theory.When would you guys realise our issues are more related to actual cash rather than just PSR , So irrespective of how much we get for Garnacho we aren't spending £300-350 million .
Teams are aware of how bad our finances are.
It is basis simple mathematics. If we sell Garnacho for 60 million, it is added in our P&L as pure profit. If we sign a replacement for 60 million, we would be able to spread the 60 million across their contract (or a max of 3 years which was changed because of Chelsea's 8 year contracts) meaning it will reflect as 20 million for this season. Hence, a cool 40 million profit for PSR.
Edit: Transfer fee can be spread to a max of 5 years. So PSR profit can be 48 million.