I'm not overly keen on the idea of selling him. It would have to be for something in the region of £60-70m with a buy back option.
Alejandro Garnacho (out)
- Thread starter Luca[4]
- Start date
Did you? becasue a minute ago you were saying he cost 40 million when the fee was 36.5 Million (2.5 Million over the RC)
I bet you’d have said that about Ronaldo too.
Kvara going for a base fee of £58 million. We can't seriously ask for more than that if we wanted to sell Garna.
He's nothing like Ronaldo mate
Anything under 60m is criminal. As a matter of fact, if we were the ones buying a Garnacho, considering the past couple of years he’s had, his age, his goals (including a Puskas), our fans wouldn’t flinch at the selling club demanding 60m+
Not our problem is it. When the roles are reversed and we’re the ones with the big windfall, suddenly every other club puts their prices up.
It's an obvious benchmark
I would like to think so.
Disagree. Garnacho should not be sold for a penny less than that.
What's the bonus figure? Assuming it's 10 to take them to the magic 80mil I'd imagine we can push for 60+10.
They can think what they like. It shouldn’t change anything from our point of view.
He’s simply not as good of a player.
That’s my opinion. That’s how a forum works. We all post our opinions.
Straight value swap for Gernacho and we are talking. Can frame it as a sale both ways for PSR, we lose Gernacho who doesn't fit, and gain a top class player who wants to leave.
Younger and more marketable, the latter counts for a lot, his social media engagement is bigger than Napoli's whole club.
He’s signing for PSG…
We could easily if Garnacho had helped us to the league on the way to numerous individual honors as well but alas...
Why it's laughable seeing people suggesting we shouldn't sell for less than Khvara's fee
Very different levels of being established around Europe for both
The club most certainly will. How do you think they generate the money for these players? Anyway, these are all metrics they will look at when valuing a player. That should be obvious. If marketability wasn't a thing, then players wouldn't be demanding millions every year for their image rights alone from clubs.Social media engagement?
Who cares.
Kvara is a better footballer.
Ed Woodwards influence is still being felt years onSocial media engagement?
Who cares.
Kvara is a better footballer.
Quite glad that the days where social media metrics factor anywhere near the discussions of squad recruitment at the club are long gone
Hence the reason I said if...
Next you'll be going on about EBITDA
He's nowhere near as good as you're making him out to be.
Please don't compare him to Ronaldo. Different level.
Who has a bigger opinion of Garnacho? Redcafe or Garnacho?
It simply doesn't matter. Maybe Napoli should be selling Kvaratskhelia for more. That isn't our problem. We know how much money Napoli now have available and it's time to take advantage, just like many clubs have done to us in the past. Napoli either pay up, or feck off. Their choice.
People completely ignoring that Kvara actively wanted to leave
The idea of building our team around him is crazy and just another example of a young United player being massively overrated
So that reduced his fee even more.
Garnacho isn't worth as much as the reduced fee.
Hence Garnacho will be close to an unreduced fee.
He's worth more to us and you'll see us not paying below that.
Guy who got the McTominay stuff to Napoli spot on is saying Garnacho. Napoli might be pushing for it. Honestly would sell for only a really really good price, considering our money troubles and PSR.
Why do we need to replace him with a 20 year old player?
We need players in their prime right now. We don’t have the luxury of waiting for potential to come good.
Would be sad to see him go
Always had a feeling he'd end up at Real Madrid later in his career
Always had a feeling he'd end up at Real Madrid later in his career
He absolutely is. 20 year old kid with his experience of playing for Manchester United. Argentinian International. Scoring multiple goals on the big stage - including one in the FA Cup final. Potential to kick on further. Long term contract at his club and the club themselves under no pressure to sell. That doesn't come cheap.
I think Garnacho is worth £50 - 60 million so no I disagree.
You forgot the social media engagment.
That's your opinion but there's no reason why our valuation of Garnacho should be dictated by Napoli's valuation of their player. There's no obligation for us to sell.
Why are Napoli selling Kvaratskhelia?
I'm confused.
Neither was half the players we’ve bought for around the same price and others have. We shouldn’t be looking at what others are sold for and taking our price for Garnacho from there, we should have our asking price already known and if someone is willing to pay up fine if not jog on.
I personally wouldn’t sell him anyway I think we’d come to regret it.