Judas
Open to offers
In todays market he could only go for over 65m as a bare minimum. I wouldn’t be rushing to sell him, I know we’re in a tough spot with PSR, but still, we can’t have teams taking the piss.
I'm not talking strictly about PSR, cashflow is also an issue.The thing is it’s not like we need to sell to comply with PSR, we only need to sell this month if we want to bring other players in during this window.
Exactly, if we need players in January we have an even greater need to sell.Clubs know we are up shits creek financially and making offers to reflect that.
It’s not PSR at fault, it’s the owners and management of the club over the last 12 years.Shouldn't have wanted PSR then.
Teams are aware of how bad our finances are.
No one is suggesting that we will sell for 38 Million...This is only an excuse that fans use... its more copium by fans.
Chelsea were bad but they sold Mount and Havertz for big money.
There are other clubs as well and they have sold for big money.
The fact is, if we sell him for 38m we will need to spend 60m to replace, so its not worth it.
Amen to this!! We are not getting any half decent player for 38m in this market. Rather let Garnacho grow as a number 10 at that price, he is still producing goals and assists at the clubThis is only an excuse that fans use... its more copium by fans.
Chelsea were bad but they sold Mount and Havertz for big money.
There are other clubs as well and they have sold for big money.
The fact is, if we sell him for 38m we will need to spend 60m to replace, so its not worth it.
No one is suggesting that we will sell for 38 Million...
We would absolutely not need to spend 60 million to replace Garnacho
You've taken something I said and acted like I said something completely different. Where exactly did I say we could get a starting player for £20 million, I'll wait...I dont know what is funny, considering the fact that Garnacho is our only real pacey winger... unless you think that we can sign a starting LAM for 20m.
I think that's fine but I don't really think we have the time to wait and see if he turns out to be useful of not, same with Hojlund. The team needs players who are going to be come in and perform now, with reliability.I think it would be a mistake to sell him. Hes only 20 and has shown great ability, and defintiely gets far too much stick despite some limtiations that remain. There aren't many 20 year olds in the world as good in my opinion, and I think he could emerge as a top player. Dont fully buy the system argument either, a quality player this young can be coached into anything. I can see why our heads might be turned but would be an enormous risk.
Sorry but that is quite a bit more than he is worth. That's a laughable amount.Unless an offer -- offer, not a final number -- comes in close to 90m I would strongly oppose even returning the phone call.
You've taken something I said and acted like I said something completely different. Where exactly did I say we could get a starting player for £20 million, I'll wait...
He wouldn't be anywhere near as hard to replace as you are making out. He isn't that fecking good, christ
He's literally a squad player at the moment.
Sorry but that is quite a bit more than he is worth. That's a laughable amount.
Look at how much the club would be willing to accept for him and how much teams are willing to pay, that should tell you all you need to know about his worth.
Which only strengthens my point about him being replaceable.He's literally 20 at the moment.
You've taken something I said and acted like I said something completely different. Where exactly did I say we could get a starting player for £20 million, I'll wait...
He wouldn't be anywhere near as hard to replace as you are making out. He isn't that fecking good, christ
He's literally a squad player at the moment.
In which case, keep him around. His contract isn't expiring anytime soon. We can raise funds by selling other players who clubs are willing to pay what we're willing to accept.The lad is worth as much as clubs are willing to pay. In this case, it looks around 50-60m.
I feel like the minutes played under ETH are almost irrelevant now. Ruben has different ideas and demands from the players.If you have a look at how many minutes Garnacho has played over the last 12-18 months, you will see what a squad player or first team player is.
Also.. people mention squad players as if they will never get to play, most squad players are very important and play approx 30/40 games a season.
When you build a squad... for example our number 10's, you would want 4 to fill 2 positions... they would all be classified as first team players.
I am not talking about how good or bad he is.. someone like Antony is a squad player.
You can't just keep spending 3 times what you sell for though like the poster said. Selling for £60m and buying 3-4 players for £180m is still a £120m loss for PSR that needs to be balanced over 3 years. For long term stability I think it's better to spread out signings and sales to have more PSR flexibility, otherwise you get into the mess that we're apparently in now where you must sell to buy.
This somehow keeps being forgotten. It's not just about PSR right now, but also in future years. Besides PSR, the money has to come from somewhereYou can't just keep spending 3 times what you sell for though like the poster said. Selling for £60m and buying 3-4 players for £180m is still a £120m loss for PSR that needs to be balanced over 3 years. For long term stability I think it's better to spread out signings and sales to have more PSR flexibility, otherwise you get into the mess that we're apparently in now where you must sell to buy.
I think that's fine but I don't really think we have the time to wait and see if he turns out to be useful of not, same with Hojlund. The team needs players who are going to be come in and perform now, with reliability.
I think people overplay how good he is because there just hasn't been much to be excited about recently and he is suffering from that and also the fact that he is relied on way too much.
In no way should be be starting for us right now. He is 20 and needs to play football and if he's not really going to get enough time here he should go elsewhere.
I feel like the minutes played under ETH are almost irrelevant now. Ruben has different ideas and demands from the players.
You are welcome to disagree that's fine I just don't think he's all that good and certainly wouldn't be worried about selling him.
I'm also not desperate for him to go like some others (Rashford) Not too fussed either way.
Why are you comparing him to Yoro?I respectfully disagree. I think he's shown real talent and believe he will move eventually, but think if he stays here his value will only go up. Im always cautious of getting over excited about young players, weve had plenty of false alarms - but I think Garnacho has brilliant ability and think his critics are excessive in the extreme.
From a purely squad management pov there are several players we should be shifting first.
Would you say the same about Yoro getting into the team either now or get rid? No, its absolutely sensible to have a core of younger players mixed with older ones and Id be very confident yoro, mainoo and garnacho are all more than good enough to make it here
I disagree with this notion that we need to 'spend bigger' to replace.The bottom line is partly the reason why I think £38m is too little. Rashford is not going to get high transfer fee. We have players in that area like Rashford, Antony who need to go, which is why then if Garnacho goes, we need to spend bigger to get another player in.
Its not just because of Garnacho's quality. At the moment, our forward options are poor. Forgetting Hojlund and Zirkzee as they are the 9 options, in the 10, we have Amad, Bruno, Antony, Rashford, Garnacho, Mount.
Rashford looks like loan, Antony is rubbish, Mount is never fit. So we are left with 3, if Garnacho goes, we need a first team player in those positions.
My preference would be to sell Rashford and Antony for combined 40m and then get someone in.
I disagree with this notion that we need to 'spend bigger' to replace.
What we need to be is smarter in the market. There is value to be had in the market you just have to find it.
We need to move away from trying to buy 'established' players. Instead taking the punt on players at the right moment so you don't pay that premium on them.
At the cost of facing the very same issues a few years down the line60 million pure profit could transform what we can do in the transfer market.
How is this possible?!?!? Did you seriously manage to go from the Glazers to even worse owners?!?!?!When would you guys realise our issues are more related to actual cash rather than just PSR , So irrespective of how much we get for Garnacho we aren't spending £300-350 million .