Alejandro Garnacho (out)

Luca[4]

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Aug 28, 2019
Messages
2
Supports
Nobody
Im not allowed to post media but

sportitalia is linking garnacho to naples

@tvdellosport

tier 2
 
For Alfredo Pedullà Garnacho is the main target of Conte to replace Kvaratskhelia. Man Utd demand 50m euros.
 
ESCLUSIVA SPORTITALIA - Conte ha deciso: per il dopo Kvara un solo nome: Antonio vuole Alejandro Garnacho, argentino 2004 del Manchester United. Prezzo 50 milioni. Manna già al lavoro ma Conte ha indicato la strada.
...
SPORTITALIA EXCLUSIVE - Conte has decided: for the post Kvara only one name: Antonio wants Alejandro Garnacho, 2004 argentinian of Manchester United. Price 50 million. Manna is already at work but Conte has shown the way.
 
jigen said:
ESCLUSIVA SPORTITALIA - Conte ha deciso: per il dopo Kvara un solo nome: Antonio vuole Alejandro Garnacho, argentino 2004 del Manchester United. Prezzo 50 milioni. Manna già al lavoro ma Conte ha indicato la strada.
...
SPORTITALIA EXCLUSIVE - Conte has decided: for the post Kvara only one name: Antonio wants Alejandro Garnacho, 2004 argentinian of Manchester United. Price 50 million. Manna is already at work but Conte has shown the way.
Click to expand...
Firstly, I highly doubt Conte would want a 20 year old prospect to replace their most creative player when they are going for a league title. Especially, if post sale they have money available.

Secondly, I don't think 50 million Euros would be enough for Utd to sell. Not that I believe Garnacho is worth way more, but in the current market where Utd are quoted obscene amounts for every Tom, Dick and Harry, it would be foolish to accept a modest fee for a young player who is not on an insane contract. We could get way more than 50 million in the summer if we do want to sell him.
 
If he played for anyone else they would be asking 80-100 mill. But not United. 40 mill and a bag of crisps it is
 
King7Eric said:
Firstly, I highly doubt Conte would want a 20 year old prospect to replace their most creative player when they are going for a league title. Especially, if post sale they have money available.

Secondly, I don't think 50 million Euros would be enough for Utd to sell. Not that I believe Garnacho is worth way more, but in the current market where Utd are quoted obscene amounts for every Tom, Dick and Harry, it would be foolish to accept a modest fee for a young player who is not on an insane contract. We could get way more than 50 million in the summer if we do want to sell him.
Click to expand...


You should ask a swap: Garnacho and 20m for Kvaratskhelia.
 
ShinjiNinja26 said:
Click to expand...

I think it would be a mistake for us to let him go after really just 18 months of gametime. There is a great deal of potential there and we need to exercise patience and allow him to work with Amorim. The kid is not even 21 yet. Cannot believe that we would be willing to entertain any offers for him at this stage. I'd be exasperated if we let him go.
 
I can see Napoli making a move for Garnacho, especially with thier new windfall.
He's slightly out of favour, we're not sure if he has a long-term role under Amorim, he's young so if he reaches his potential could have a high resale value and his mentality would be advantageous for a coach like Conte.
Also, if we want to make our own moves in this market then we may see Garnacho as a player we could sacrifice for some major income and put it towards a player who is fundamental in Amorim's set up.
 
FrankDrebin said:
I can see Napoli making a move for Garnacho, especially with thier new windfall.
He's slightly out of favour, we're not sure if he has a long-term role under Amorim, he's young so if he reaches his potential could have a high resale value and his mentality would be advantageous for a coach like Conte.
Also, if we want to make our own moves in this market then we may see Garnacho as a player we could sacrifice for some major income and put it towards a player who is fundamental in Amorim's set up.
Click to expand...
These are all fair points, but do you consider 50m a major income, considering what any kind of replacement would cost us?
 
If they sell the one who cannot be spelled, they should have the money.

If it goes through, any deal should contain an option to come back. Rather see him here to be honest but is also a risk.
 
Dannn411 said:
I think it would be a mistake for us to let him go after really just 18 months of gametime. There is a great deal of potential there and we need to exercise patience and allow him to work with Amorim. The kid is not even 21 yet. Cannot believe that we would be willing to entertain any offers for him at this stage. I'd be exasperated if we let him go.
Click to expand...
In an ideal world it would be great if we can keep him. But we need to satisfy PSR and build our squad, with Garnacho ill suited to our system and representing pure profit.

It would need to be a big fee and Napoli will get a lot of money from selling a star player.
 
It would be insane if we let him go and I would really begin to question what direction we are headed in as a club if we let him go now. Yes he has some bad traits in his game but may I remind everyone that he is 20 years old!!! He has barely even started his career and we're ready to give up on him? Even with all he has already shown us? I just cannot understand why on earth we would even entertain offers for him.
 
hellhunter said:
A terrible one at that
Click to expand...

How come? Osimhen’s a quality striker which we’re in desperate need of and Garnacho’s a player who by the looks of It doesn’t suit the managers system. He’s also one of the few we could command good money for and would go down as pure profit on the books. I’m not keen on the idea of selling our top academy players but he’s not in the Mainoo category of unsellable for me.
 
ShinjiNinja26 said:
How come? Osimhen’s a quality striker which we’re in desperate need of and Garnacho’s a player who by the looks of It doesn’t suit the managers system. He’s also one of the few we could command good money for and would go down as pure profit on the books. I’m not keen on the idea of selling our top academy players but he’s not in the Mainoo category of unsellable for me.
Click to expand...
I just don't like the idea of Osimhen. I prefer a United with Garnacho than one with Osimhen, even if like you say Garnacho is more sellable than others (mainly Mainoo)
 
A great talent but if we are backing our new manager there is nowhere in the system for Garnacho unfortunately. A bid north of £50m would be tempting.
 
Feel for the lad, new manager, new system, fans outside the ground giving him grief for their YouTube channels. All in the space of a few months.

I hope Garnacho can keep his head down and focus all his energy at learning and impressing Amorim.
 
Dannn411 said:
I think it would be a mistake for us to let him go after really just 18 months of gametime. There is a great deal of potential there and we need to exercise patience and allow him to work with Amorim. The kid is not even 21 yet. Cannot believe that we would be willing to entertain any offers for him at this stage. I'd be exasperated if we let him go.
Click to expand...

Ideally yes we’d keep him but so far he doesn’t seem to suit the managers system so I don’t know if he’ll be in his plans long term. If he continues to play a bit part role in this team then his values only going to go down, he’s one of the few in the squad we can command big money for and with how tight we are with PSR I wouldn’t be completely against selling him, especially as it represents pure profit. I’m not suggesting we start doing a Chelsea and flog all our academy talents but in the case of Garnacho I could see it making sense.
 
hellhunter said:
I just don't like the idea of Osimhen. I prefer a United with Garnacho than one with Osimhen, even if like you say Garnacho is more sellable than others (mainly Mainoo)
Click to expand...

Fair enough, there are questions about Osimhen’s character so I can see why people would be put off. I’m not 100% sold either but we’re in dire need of goals and he’s one of the more attainable goal scorers out there.
 
Don't think he'd be a big loss to us. The amount of money we should be able to get for him would help massively in improving the first team
 
I would absolutely sell Garnacho for the right price, and Napoli makes a lot of sense. Still not convinced he really fits this new system.
 
I wouldn’t be against selling Garnacho. Hard to see where he exactly fits in with Amorim and I still feel like pace wise he doesn’t have enough of it to be a truly world class winger nor the technical ability to make up for it.
 
I think Garnacho will be sold before next season but for no less than £60 million.
 
I can’t see it happening to be honest .
We will lose Rashford this month and that will leave us with an injury prone Mount , Bruno , Amad and a hopeless Antony for 2 positions
 
AndySmith1990 said:
Don't think he'd be a big loss to us. The amount of money we should be able to get for him would help massively in improving the first team
Click to expand...
Who can we get to come in mid season and help us when we are already struggling? Selling him makes sense if we get an offer too good to refuse (which I don’t think €50 million is), and we have someone lined up to come in immediately.
 
Will be sad to see him go, and no doubt he'll go on to become a very capable winger, probably even come back to haunt us at some stage, but I can't see this going any other way. From an INEOS perspective, they have an asset that will depreciate in value the longer he spends as a sub, who doesn't quite fit into the new system of the manager they brought in. Amorim will want players that fit. No ifs, no buts, no waiting on potential. He will hold no sentiment toward any of the players he's inherited.

Part of me feels like it's time for the club to start practising what they've been preaching about moving in a new direction, and it's a shame that Garnacho may be one of the players that falls victim to club's sheer ineptitude they've demonstrated these past few years, because ideally, he'd be settled into a system that gives him free reign down that left-wing, and we'd be the ones to reap the rewards of a prime Garnacho, but I feel like it's going to be a case of the one who got away. Hope I'm wrong.

10/10 performance for the last 20 he comes on today, please.
 
Last edited:
Dannn411 said:
I think it would be a mistake for us to let him go after really just 18 months of gametime. There is a great deal of potential there and we need to exercise patience and allow him to work with Amorim. The kid is not even 21 yet. Cannot believe that we would be willing to entertain any offers for him at this stage. I'd be exasperated if we let him go.
Click to expand...
I like Garna, he is talented but he is not that special, ala Mainoo special, if Napoli want him and are willing to part with hefty chunk of that windfall, then the club should go for it, only if it's worth it for the club
 
Dannn411 said:
I think it would be a mistake for us to let him go after really just 18 months of gametime. There is a great deal of potential there and we need to exercise patience and allow him to work with Amorim. The kid is not even 21 yet. Cannot believe that we would be willing to entertain any offers for him at this stage. I'd be exasperated if we let him go.
Click to expand...
He seems like a dick though. If they entertained some type of deal where they took him and we got Kvara, I'd be all for it
 
You must log in or register to reply here.