won’t be withde jong, more likely tielemans
Adrien Rabiot
- Thread starter Someone
- Start date
- Status
won’t be withde jong, more likely tielemans
Look what this club has done to us. People in here pointing out how Rabiot is an improvement on McFred being a positive. Who isn't an improvement on McFred?! Sorry but that's not a good enough reason to sign Rabiot. I'd honestly rather us just give Garner some serious game time over the punt on this bang average player. It reeks of desperation. This club with its supposed aspirations of building for the future and getting back to challenging, shouldn't even be considering players other top clubs don't mind letting go. If he ain't good enough for Juve, why is he deemed good enough for us?
Big massive NO
Big massive NO
I think its quite funny to see the difference in replies from when it was just speculation back in June to when its now looking likely to happen.
He and Neves I can deal with or Tielemans and Neves would be even better. He alone, no thanks but I read Scott may go the other way, I have my ears alert. As you can see, I'm confused and have no idea what I would like. It's as messy as this club, what a bloody joke.
Sure about that?
Go on elaborate..Sometimes stats lie....
He is definitely a better player than McFred no matter how you put it, and no matter what stats say... But I don't think he is good enough to give us the lift we need, he never lived up to the potential he had, and I doubt ETH is gonna be enough to get him there.
Who needs personal assessment when you can rely on crude stats to do the thinking for you.
Oh dear. Scott McTominay who can’t get past Billy Gilmour and John McGuinn.
I wonder if Rabiot would play CB for Scotland
Why do we need to go beyond a year ago to find stats to justify Rabiot? Isnt that in itself a concern?
- Status