I will pick Klaus Urbanczyk
That's what you get for picking Stiles.Matosas..... Noooooooooooooooooo!
There's one I REALLY want to pick, although I need to search a bit more if he can fit in the role I want him for and not for what he's traditionally known for.Still 3 players I can't believe haven't been taken yet. Probably loads left but there are 3 who really stand out.
Yeah, he was certainly on the list and reasonably high up it as well. But after the big two at right-back, there is a group of many around about the same level so it wasn't worth prioritising for us. Still he was a classy player no doubt about it and probably the best British full-back in the pool.True.
Quite surprising that Jardine lasted this long, btw. I'd have thought Gio/Theon would've picked him up a couple of rounds ago, actually. Was even starting to think there was half a chance now - but I fecked myself over there, again.
There's one I REALLY want to pick, although I need to search a bit more if he can fit in the role I want him for and not for what he's traditionally known for.
You can send it to me, in case he's not back in time.Anyone wants to take Tuppet's pick?
PM sent @TuppetYou can send it to me, in case he's not back in time.
But after the big two at right-back, there is a group of many around about the same level so it wasn't worth prioritising for us.
Can't find that "new ideas" thread, so I'm posting this here:
This goes back to what was discussed briefly to begin with in this thread, i.e. which new ideas to try out in this draft.
Several have pointed out that the current draft isn't ideal for any grand experiments - and I agree with that.
However, there is one detail I've been thinking about - and which could be tested, if people are positive. Coming up with ways of making substitutions more "realistic" and more of an actual tactical device has been discussed several times before. With regard to that I have a particular - and very simple - suggestion:
The formation pic in the OP stands - regardless - unless there is something purely technical wrong with it. This means that only voters who bother to read the match thread will be privy to substitutions/tactical changes: New formation pics will be posted in the thread as it progresses (and may be thread marked, for instance), but will not replace the original (nor will any tactical changes be edited into the original write-up).
The way it works now, a "substitution" is effectively a do-over. If you do over quickly enough, you will hardly be punished. This is not "realistic" at all, for one, and not really fair on your opponent either (who may have landed you a tactical blow with a surprise inclusion on his part - one which he benefits too little from, at least potentially).
Voters who don't read the discussions, but only look at the formation pics, are part and parcel of these things - and fair enough, as such - but there's no sense in allowing them more influence than strictly speaking needed. If you feck up, you should pay for it - and not be bailed out by scan voters who aren't aware of the fact (that you initially fecked up).
Bernard Bosquier
Quality at CB or RB. 2 time ligue one player of the year
Shame, was hoping to partner him with Fischer.I will pick the only player to score a hat-trick in a World Cup final as well the scorer of that phantom goal against West Germany at the 1966 World Cup.
Geoff Hurst
@harms
Someone else update the list. I'm on the mobile at the moment.
Nice pick @Joga Bonito!!
Belgian Football Writer Rene Marien in kicker said:Unforgettable what Netzer contributed during the 90 minutes.
He was however not the only one having a big share in this top game. Sieloff too had to exhibit a strong performance, in my opinion he was even better than Beckenbauer. How Sieloff unleashed massive shots after each of his many solos out of Gladbach’s defense was incredible!