Chesterlestreet
Man of the crowd
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2012
- Messages
- 19,791
Just put steal of the draft for my pick, courtesy of Joga.
You made me abandon my new lifestyle and re-enable the damn images. Is that Ubinas?
Just put steal of the draft for my pick, courtesy of Joga.
You made me abandon my new lifestyle and re-enable the damn images. Is that Ubinas?
Luis Ubina but google image search has him out to be one Jose Nasazzi
I have itWho's got Aldo's picks?
I have it
Why? Why did you have to take him?van der Kuijlen
Sounds like a badly translated porno script.Viktor Kolotov
He wasn't idle for a minute: pressing enemy at the time of receiving the ball on any part of the field, long passing prints to Blokhin and Onishchenko, he completed the attack with precise strikes. His performance was exceptionally meaningful and rational. Nothing superfluous, everything is subordinated to a specific task: to stroke in the middle of the field without waste time, but in a difficult situations wasn't afraid to play individually.
He was constant during the entire match, the fight for the ball wasn't only destructive. On the contrary, getting the ball, Kolotov started a new attack. Over the years, his playmaker role became increasingly noticeable. Competitors, aware of this, give him attention. Stop Kolotov without violating the rules, it wasn't easy. He fully experienced the whole arsenal of techniques "anti-football": running boards, linings, blows to the legs.
Formally, he was listed as a midfielder, but in 90 minutes of continuous movement on the field he managed to play as stopper and center forward, and also on the flanks of the attack. All the things he does seemed easy, effortless, without any tension.
This original technique of external relief, gave him the ball, in a way that distinguished him from others. But the chief was quick thinking, with ability to anticipate the situation a few moves ahead. Therefore, extra effort wasn't required. In a few words Kolotov was simple, terse and extremely reliable.
Sounds like a badly translated porno script.
Sorry bro I needed another proven scorer, so.... Yeah.Why? Why did you have to take him?
Viktor Kolotov, with burning loins like a Molotov
There he went.Right, I'll take Ray Clemence to complete the XI. Will update the list presently.
Aye probably. He's up there with Shilts who was the dog's bollocks. But in fairness the keeper pool is strong.There he went.
Surely he's a better goalkeeper than some of the others that have already been picked?
Surely he's a better goalkeeper than some of the others that have already been picked?
There he went.
Surely he's a better goalkeeper than some of the others that have already been picked?
Is that listed after "invalid pick" for previous ones?
Would say Zoff and Maier are ahead of about 6 or 7 others that were all on a similar level...There he went.
Surely he's a better goalkeeper than some of the others that have already been picked?
I had Zoff, Maier, Shilton and Clemence down as the keepers I expected would go far before any others. Far easier to win scan votes with those four than the others that have been picked so far. Not that many will decide based on the goalkeeper, mind you...Would say Zoff and Maier are ahead of about 6 or 7 others that were all on a similar level...
Not that it would make a difference in matches, but I'd rate Zoff, Shilton, Maier and Jennings before Clemence. Probably even Hellstorm.
I'd say Clemence over Shilton. But Jennings over Clemence.
Anyway, the only possible impact the keeper has in these drafts would be on scan voters. And on that note, I'd say that Zoff, Maier and Shilton are top 3 in terms of reputation and sell-ability. Probably followed by Jennings (who's a recognized legend, as it were) and Clemence (whose credentials are impeccable and whose name is familiar to most).
In practice, though, you can probably get away with sticking a sack of potatoes called "P. Lausible" back there - and forget about the whole keeper issue. We all know how it works.
Then I made a mistake by taking Maier as 3rd pickThey just don't matter. I once had Yashin, the greatest goalkeeper of all times, it doesn't get more voter-friendly than him, and my opponent had a keeper that conceded in every game against my forward (it was something like 5 or 6 goals in 5 games). Do you think anybody gave a damn? We really need to change the system somehow.
True, Keepers make next to no difference in drafts, I had Yashin (as well as Krol, Keizer, Edwards & Best) I was KO 1st roundThey just don't matter. I once had Yashin, the greatest goalkeeper of all times, it doesn't get more voter-friendly than him, and my opponent had a keeper that conceded in every game against my forward (it was something like 5 or 6 goals in 5 games). Do you think anybody gave a damn? We really need to change the system somehow.
It's always a good idea to pick at least one Swede for the team and have you stand up for them. If antohan wasn't gone, I would have added a player from Uruguay for the same reason .