4000 consecutive first team matches with homegrown player(s) in the squad | 4284 as of 15 Dec 2024

Sorry for bumping the old thread but...


with McTominay gone, Rashford likely leaving the club am i right thinking that Mainoo is the only youth product in the squad now and the record is in somehow jeopardy?
Garnacho, Evans, Heaton.

Amass, Collyer and Wheatley have all been on the bench this season. It’ll be fine for now but next season is a bit more of a risk, however I would be surprised if Amorim doesn’t find someone he likes from the reserves. Amass looks good for the wing back role or he might bring back Alvaro Fernandez who would count.
 
I think it’s a somewhat legitimate worry. Heaton won’t make the bench other than in the Europa League, and Rashford and Garnacho were taken out of the squad recently. Kobbie’s been struggling with injuries and form.

Most likely the bolded ones will make the squad until the end of the season, but last Sunday we were one Mainoo illness/knock away from ending the record.
 
I'm sure someone at the club will have told Ruben about this and he'll bring players in to the squad just to keep this amazing run going. They had that Kukonki kid in there the other day.
 
I think it’s a somewhat legitimate worry. Heaton won’t make the bench other than in the Europa League, and Rashford and Garnacho were taken out of the squad recently. Kobbie’s been struggling with injuries and form.

Most likely the bolded ones will make the squad until the end of the season, but last Sunday we were one Mainoo illness/knock away from ending the record.
That's true.

There might well be some games where it takes a conscious decision to put a Heaton or Evans on the bench solely for the record. In that moment, I guess it all hinges on whether Anorim actually wants to keep the record going as a proud history for the club - or is prepared to see it end as part of the reset and new beginning.

Hopefully he's happy to see it continue - there's certainly a lot the club do need to change and move away from going forward, but this record certainly isn't one of them and is something to be proud of.
 
It should be a record based on merit. If we start just calling someone up with no intention of bringing them on, just to keep the record, it’s a hollow record to have.

We shouldn’t be afraid to lose it if there isn’t a player in the squad on merit. Part of moving forward is not being tied to the past. Not having a youth product in the squad doesn’t erase the history and won’t stop the club bringing new players though as it always has.
 
Sorry for bumping the old thread but...


with McTominay gone, Rashford likely leaving the club am i right thinking that Mainoo is the only youth product in the squad now and the record is in somehow jeopardy?
What about that young CB?
 
It should be a record based on merit. If we start just calling someone up with no intention of bringing them on, just to keep the record, it’s a hollow record to have.

We shouldn’t be afraid to lose it if there isn’t a player in the squad on merit. Part of moving forward is not being tied to the past. Not having a youth product in the squad doesn’t erase the history and won’t stop the club bringing new players though as it always has.
Fair point - if that became an ongoing issue.

But if it's just a specific match where, because of circurmstances, all players perfectly capable of starts (Mainoo, Garnacho, Rashford) were unavailable - then I think it would be a real and unnecessary shame to end the run when you could just as easily put the likes of Heaton on the bench (who is no worse than Bayindir, and either unlikely to be used), or Evans (perfectly capable understudy who does get some starts already), or a youngster with some genuine potential (plenty have featured as unused subs during our injury issues last season and this).

All these players are in the squad already, with first team squad numbers, and already featured in matchday squads - so putting them on the bench at another point hardly makes the record 'hollow'.
 
It should be a record based on merit. If we start just calling someone up with no intention of bringing them on, just to keep the record, it’s a hollow record to have.

We shouldn’t be afraid to lose it if there isn’t a player in the squad on merit. Part of moving forward is not being tied to the past. Not having a youth product in the squad doesn’t erase the history and won’t stop the club bringing new players though as it always has.

Absolutely.
 
It’s likely next season we will only have Garnacho and Mainoo in the squad with maybe Amass on the bench depending on progression
 
What counts as homegrown? Would that young striker we signed from Arsenal count for example?
In premier league terms it's someone who has played three seasons for the club before their 21st birthday
 
In premier league terms it's someone who has played three seasons for the club before their 21st birthday
Cheers!

Does play in this context mean any minutes for the first team? Registered for the squad (youth players don't need registering, right?)
 
It should be a record based on merit. If we start just calling someone up with no intention of bringing them on, just to keep the record, it’s a hollow record to have.

We shouldn’t be afraid to lose it if there isn’t a player in the squad on merit. Part of moving forward is not being tied to the past. Not having a youth product in the squad doesn’t erase the history and won’t stop the club bringing new players though as it always has.
Yep. Also if it gets broken because players are injured then oh well? What exactly is the purpose of keeping it going? Cause it looks good? Yeah it might be an annoying itch to scratch for your brain if we go one game without but it doesn’t really mean anything in the grand scheme of things.
 
What counts as homegrown? Would that young striker we signed from Arsenal count for example?

It’s in the op.

…what constitutes a homegrown player – have to have signed before the age of 18, played at a junior level below the first team at United and not to have played for another team at senior level.
 
It’s in the op.
Though that seems to have changed a little. Toby Collyer counted and United website explained why at the time...

The historic academy graduate methodology for all players signed before 1 July 2012, is as follows:

- Signed for Manchester United before turning 18
- Never played senior professional football for any other club
- Played fixtures for an academy team

For any player signed after 1 July 2012 (Introduction of EPPP and creation of PL2):

- Signed for Manchester United before turning 21
- Never played senior professional football for any other club
- Played fixtures for an academy team

Congratulations for the remarkable achievement, Toby!
 
Though that seems to have changed a little. Toby Collyer counted and United website explained why at the time...

The historic academy graduate methodology for all players signed before 1 July 2012, is as follows:

- Signed for Manchester United before turning 18
- Never played senior professional football for any other club
- Played fixtures for an academy team

For any player signed after 1 July 2012 (Introduction of EPPP and creation of PL2):

- Signed for Manchester United before turning 21
- Never played senior professional football for any other club
- Played fixtures for an academy team

Congratulations for the remarkable achievement, Toby!

Yeah that was what United decided to do. Tony still doesn't consider Collier as a United academy graduate because he was 18 when he signed.
 
Yep. Also if it gets broken because players are injured then oh well? What exactly is the purpose of keeping it going? Cause it looks good? Yeah it might be an annoying itch to scratch for your brain if we go one game without but it doesn’t really mean anything in the grand scheme of things.

It's a record to be proud of to me. If it doesn't mean making compromises I'd love to see it continue.
 
I'm sure Amorim will promote someone from the academy. Over the course of this season or the summer.

Even if that doesn't happen, this record will almost certainly be unbeatable. It will have to end some day.
 
I’d be surprised if the club isn’t aware of it and managers aren’t under instructions to keep the record going as it’s such an impressive stretch.

However, if that’s the case it almost makes it a bit of an artificial record if it’s only continued because the manager was obligated to put an academy player on the bench instead of their preferred choice.
 
I’d be surprised if the club isn’t aware of it and managers aren’t under instructions to keep the record going as it’s such an impressive stretch.

However, if that’s the case it almost makes it a bit of an artificial record if it’s only continued because the manager was obligated to put an academy player on the bench instead of their preferred choice.

Fortunately at United the higher-ups don't get involved in squad selections. The club of course is aware of it as is Amorim, but I don't think anyone is forcing it to continue.
 
If it's just about being in the squad/on the bench, I don't see why we would have any problems?

Only Mazraoui, Shaw and Mount who's injured/doubtful currently.
 
It's a good point, but for what it's worth there's definitely a few from the current crop who I think would be worthy of a part in the first team.

Perhaps so, but if they're good/ready enough, they will be in the squad. If not, they won't. And when more or less the whole first team squad is fit, it's difficult for those 16-19 year old players to get a chance. As it should be.
 
If Kobbie was injured on sunday and Rashford + Garnacho were dropped regardless that squad space would go to either Evans or an academy player anyway I imagine.
 
It's a record to be proud of to me. If it doesn't mean making compromises I'd love to see it continue.
I’m sure everyone would but it breaking because Mainoo/Garnacho get injured or don’t make the squad doesn’t make it any less impressive, and it would carry on after that too.
 
I’m sure everyone would but it breaking because Mainoo/Garnacho get injured or don’t make the squad doesn’t make it any less impressive, and it would carry on after that too.

Yeah fair enough. Although it would be a new record of 1 game, then 2, then 3 etc... A bit different to 4,284. The consecutiveness is the impressive part about the record.
 
Whilst I get the merit of the "it should be based on merit" argument, having 1 academy product (however that is defined) in the matchday squad is not a huge ask. Whether an academy product in the first team or a member of the youth yeam who is doing well, we should aim to preserve that tradition. Its not a huge sacrifice to keep an element of the club that has now become part of our identity.
 
Just bring Alvaro back to be safe. His stats are nearly as good as A. Davies and his wages would be 2/3rds lower.
He's not as good as Davies full stop, I like Alvaro but there's so many better options knocking about
 
It shouldn't become a tick box exercise just to keep the run going. There's lots of talent in the academy though. I'm all in favour of rewarding hard work with a place in the match day squad.
 
To be fair, to everyone saying "the spot should be earned" etc. that's slightly short sighted. In theory, yes. But in actuality, it's not an exact science to find if a player is good enough to make the step up. Look at Rashford.

The statistic is much more about sending a message to the academy that yes, there is always a place for you in the first team. That route will always be open to you, you'll always have a chance of making it if you work hard and step up at the right moment. That's pretty powerful and I think ending that would be an awful message to send to the academy and the academy staff which would have much further reaching repercussions than you'd expect. United is a place that trusts in youth, that youth will step up when called upon. And part of that requires a bit of blind trust on the clubs part.
 
He's not as good as Davies full stop, I like Alvaro but there's so many better options knocking about
I don't know. I think for the price and wages compared to other options and especially at wing back, I would be delighted with him.