Tony Babangida
Full Member
- Joined
- May 15, 2017
- Messages
- 813
Stacey Abrams deserves a lot of credit for it.So GA will be blue for the first time since Clinton, right? I thought they were uber-conservative regarding abortus and stuff? Did the shooting of Arbery and BLM make that much of a difference in the end?
No bots going on at all in his comments which are highly ironic given what alot of people said in 2016 and all they did was say "crying liberal snowflake"
No bots going on at all in his comments which are highly ironic given what alot of people said in 2016 and all they did was say "crying liberal snowflake"
John King for United manager!CNN really make it dramatic enough to keep watching don't they
it's been the same thing over and over again for the last two days and yet here I am, still watching.CNN really make it dramatic enough to keep watching don't they
A brilliant example of Poe's Law in action.It’s a meme mate
So GA will be blue for the first time since Clinton, right? I thought they were uber-conservative regarding abortus and stuff? Did the shooting of Arbery and BLM make that much of a difference in the end?
It’s a meme mate
Another Clayton one.
Don't feel bad, anything's possible in Donald's Twitter feed. At least it wasn't a flaming cock.Whoooops
No bots going on at all in his comments which are highly ironic given what alot of people said in 2016 and all they did was say "crying liberal snowflake"
Thanks for that, really interesting!This is actually a really good article for how Georgia turned blue. How Stacey Abrams Is Turning the Tide in Georgia
What she helped do turning a stolen election, voter gerrymandering, suppression into this is remarkable. Along with changing demographics in the state is what made this possible.
Andrew Yang wearing a “MATH” lapel pin
AP has a near 100% hit rate on their calls. It was indeed premature but I think they'll end up being right in the end.These news channels are just boring now. They all know, and have for about a day, that this is done and could be called.
Ironically, the one state which is genuinely still to be decided is the one lots have already called - Arizona. Absolutely no idea why people jumped the gun on this.
Well I’m choosing to ignore your explanation and believe he’s trolling trumpers. Please leave me in my ignorant happy place. Thank you.I believe it stands for Make America Think Harder.
Spoken like a true Republican.Well I’m choosing to ignore your explanation and believe he’s trolling trumpers. Please leave me in my ignorant happy place. Thank you.
They're not going to call Pennsylvania while Trump is still in the lead no matter how hard it's trending towards a big Biden win. That'll set the nutjobs off even more. The less contested it is, the better.These news channels are just boring now. They all know, and have for about a day, that this is done and could be called.
Ironically, the one state which is genuinely still to be decided is the one lots have already called - Arizona. Absolutely no idea why people jumped the gun on this.
This is actually a really good article for how Georgia turned blue. How Stacey Abrams Is Turning the Tide in Georgia
What she helped do turning a stolen election, voter gerrymandering, suppression into this is remarkable. Along with changing demographics in the state is what made this possible.
Didn't expect to pull off GA. PA is also in the bag then considering the batches left. With AZ and NV he'll make it a sweep.
Someone knowledgeable: what are the chances of the Dems pushing through big changes that would shift the balance of power electorally during a possible Biden presidency, e.g - legislative representation for the District of Columbia, reforming the Electoral College, statehood/voting rights for US territories like Puerto Rico?
Do mainstream Dems want these things/see them as achievable and desirable? What would be required to achieve them in terms of votes in the state and federal legislature/courts?
Close to zero if the the senate situation stays as it is. This will be a brutally frustrating Presidency for Biden.Someone knowledgeable: what are the chances of the Dems pushing through big changes that would shift the balance of power electorally during a possible Biden presidency, e.g - legislative representation for the District of Columbia, reforming the Electoral College, statehood/voting rights for US territories like Puerto Rico?
Do mainstream Dems want these things/see them as achievable and desirable? What would be required to achieve them in terms of votes in the state and federal legislature/courts?
Someone not knowledgeable: seems rather unlikely since Reps are still controlling Senate and Supreme Court.Someone knowledgeable: what are the chances of the Dems pushing through big changes that would shift the balance of power electorally during a possible Biden presidency, e.g - legislative representation for the District of Columbia, reforming the Electoral College, statehood/voting rights for US territories like Puerto Rico?
Do mainstream Dems want these things/see them as achievable and desirable? What would be required to achieve them in terms of votes in the state and federal legislature/courts?
240 votes in a batch? Have they literally just got one person sitting there counting them.