Eriku
Full Member
It definitely helps, don’t know if it tilts the scales though.
hence my qualifier, "a bit"
It definitely helps, don’t know if it tilts the scales though.
Jesus lets not pretend we know anything here.It was pathetic and cowardly.
Playing for the club where the fans regularly ridicule and victim blame his Dad for that incident. He wouldn't want a thing to do with United even if we had the "project", which we don't. People are being naïve if they think otherwise.
Yeah actually mental that happened.
Of course it's subjective, but that's like justifying me saying this is the worst post I've ever seen, by saying you can't argue because it's my point of view. Of course you can, because it's clearly not.
Not a lot, mischief making at an interesting time don’t you think? And one poster here acting like it was as criminal as a political assassination. I wonder who they support!Can't read as it's behind a paywall but what else is left to tell about this story exactly?
Football was a different game back then.the worst thing about the whole thing for me is Keane doesn't even regret doing it
Muscat stepping onto a football field is bad enough.
That's a fair point, it is probably the most televised and talked about.It's a different in the sense that Roy Keane's tackle was genuinely a bad one. You might find that his tackle appears in probably every bad tackle video you can find out there.
In that sense it's fair to say its probably among the worst tackles ever televised in a major league which is what most people will remember.
If you accept that, then it's not too much of a stretch to think that someone might genuinely feel Roy's is the worst. For lovers of the premier league it's probably the most memorable one.
I'm not sure it's that ridiculous. The Thatcher one was probably worse, but Keano knew exactly what he was doing and give or take a few inches, could have left Haaland's leg in an Eduardo/Ramsey like shape.Good feature in The Athletic this week on the Haaland / Keane tackle.
Although this quote got me;
Apparently, he missed Ben Thatcher assaulting Pedro Mendes while he was playing for City or perhaps Michael Brown stamping on Ronaldo as he lay on the floor. What a ridiculous, hyperbole comment.
He was a rotten player.
Not true. He didn’t want to end his career. He wanted to hurt him.
You're talking out of your arse as I say, you cannot watch this and tell me ANYONE can think Keane's challenge was the worst he's seen, it's hyperbolic nonsense.
Should be the end of the discussion.Eh. He played the rest of the game, played four days later in another game, then had surgery on his other knee at the end of the season which ended his career. Cant even be bothered to read the article.
When you go for the knee then only to cause the max damage for a sportsman.
Just imagine Keane wearing Pool or Leeds jersey, what would you say?
No one in clear mind could defend an action like this. Honestly don't know much worse actions in all sports. Maybe Tyson biting Holyfield comes to mind, maybe...
My god some of those are insane!
No one in clear mind could defend an action like this.
Good feature in The Athletic this week on the Haaland / Keane tackle.
Although this quote got me;
Apparently, he missed Ben Thatcher assaulting Pedro Mendes while he was playing for City or perhaps Michael Brown stamping on Ronaldo as he lay on the floor. What a ridiculous, hyperbole comment.
Some of them are just so over-the-top, it's almost WWE level! And there is the guy who picks the guy in the head while that guy is lying prone on the ground.Yup, some are actual leg breakers or putting people in hospital. Haaland played on but some in here are trying to convince us that “it’s the worst thing I’ve seen on a football pitch” is a non hyperbolic opinion.
It was nasty, very naughty, but feck me, that video is full of utterly horrendous leg breakers on planted legs.
You honestly don't know much worse actions in all sports? Seriously, feck off and get the round in.When you go for the knee then only to cause the max damage for a sportsman.
Just imagine Keane wearing Pool or Leeds jersey, what would you say?
No one in clear mind could defend an action like this. Honestly don't know much worse actions in all sports. Maybe Tyson biting Holyfield comes to mind, maybe...
Haaland won’t come cos of his dad? Give me a break looks to me like you guys are getting excuses in early for him not coming when the board inevitably fecks up the transfer or he prefers city etc. Can’t imagine him or his dad give a single toss about an incident which happened 20 years ago involving a player who has long retired.
I personally don’t think it’s enough for him not to come here, no. Especially since the incident involved a single player and not the club as a whole. Btw I agree that he has enough reasons not to come here, my point is that the thing with Keane and Alf is probably bottom of that list.You dont think being clattered on the field like that is something you can shrug about?
Halaand has more excuses enough as it is not to come here. He doesnt need one.
You honestly don't know much worse actions in all sports? Seriously, feck off and get the round in.
I personally don’t think it’s enough for him not to come here, no. Especially since the incident involved a single player and not the club as a whole.
Sorry I edited the post to clarify that I do agree that he has reasons not to come here, just that the incident is probably last on his list and more to do with that you’ve said I.e. having the cherry pick of better teamsA good excuse not to favor a struggling team. We're not exactly his boyhood club.
And this is the guy who can get top dollar in most club he wants, from juventus to city and even Barcelona would be racingnfor his signature. But yeah. Extra points for clattering his dad.
You honestly don't know much worse actions in all sports? Seriously, feck off and get the round in.
And there’s teams players wouldn’t go near either even if they are a better side, if it’s me choosing between City or United a team my dad played for or a bitter rival that this happened to my dad, I think it would come into consideration.
I don’t think a single person has defended it?
Football was a different game back then.
A year before the Keane tackle, Neil Ruddock tried to intentionally end Andy Cole's career with an X-rated lunge that snapped his leg in half in a reserve game. Ruddock bragged about it years later as if it was the funniest thing ever and that he did it for his pal Teddy Sheringham who hated Cole. Just because he was forced to apologise after, doesn't mean his apology was sincere.
Keane would have been on the pitch in the reserve game that day and seen what happened to his teammate. Leg-breaking tackles were a part of the game back then. Every team had their own hatchet man who was required to give as good as they got if the opposition came for a fight and not to play football. Every weekend you'd see a leg-breaker tackle on Match of the Day.
I guess all this was before your time if you think Keane's lunge was a one-off in the Premier league back then. It was an ugly stupid foul no doubt, but not uncommon.
Well the guy I quoted actually did. Or what would you call it?
You sure he defended it? Quote it then.
You said you honestly couldn't think of worse actions in sport . Please don't insist on making up anything about me saying Keane's tackle was ok. I'm, very specifically, pointing out that your statement that can't think of much worse actions in support and then citing a boxer biting man's ear off as some sort of equivalence as being completely ludicrous.So it's ok because there's worse out there?
Check post #92, I did.
Relativization (I hope that's the correct word) is a form of defence.
He wanted to hurt him.