RedDevil@84
Full Member
Called it. So predicatble Ole. Wouldn't sub Rashford. It has to be Mason all the timeCue in James coming on for Mason
Called it. So predicatble Ole. Wouldn't sub Rashford. It has to be Mason all the timeCue in James coming on for Mason
well and trulyOle has shat he’s pants
I would have bet good money that would have been Rashford. Wowit’s beyond a joke....
If we lose, this is on Ole. No balls
He is if he thinks he should be starting more often.Bailly is an utter fool.
How has Rashford merited to remain on the pitch ahead of Greenwood?
You just gotta laugh at this pointFine I’ll quote myself.
Rashy better peno taker than greenwWtf, I'm behind why is he taking Greenland off. For Fred?!
Greenwood could take a penalty. Fred I'd really rather he didn't
Why not for Rashy if you use Fred?
We are so losing this
Bailly giving away a free kick
Can already see the short run up and soft shot at the perfect height for the goalkeeperPut your house on Fred missing a pen
Doesn't know what to do i think. Emery has experience in games like thisOle has shat he’s pants
We could have won if we had a winger on formMaybe Ole wants Rashford on for the pens?
They’ve been the better team throughout.
Maybe Ole wants Rashford on for the pens?
Looks like Fred might be taking a penaltyI would have bet good money that would have been Rashford. Wow
Clement Turpin