or drawA team everyone is happy with. That means we'll lose.
or drawA team everyone is happy with. That means we'll lose.
Draw, for us, has been like losing.or draw
Gomes for stopping all our pathetic finishing attempts of course!So what/who are we going to blame if we don't win?
FellainiSo what/who are we going to blame if we don't win?
That's because Burnley happened.Unbelievable , Home to Watford with an attack minded lineup and were arguing about drawing or losing.
Too defensive, 0-0 written all over this.
Wow, you really have to find something negative to say, huh?
white text
Who's #10 Mata or Micky?
That's what caught me out.Well, well, Martial for Rashford.
10/11
That's because Burnley happened.
Pleased with the team but we need an upgrade on Mata.
To me Watford is a team with a lot of muscles. Not a lot of players in that squad with a normal weight and they've already offloaded some of their biggest weights.Mourinho did say Watford are very organized, but very defensive.
Not really a freak result, it keeps happening regularly.Yeah , lets gets worked up on a freak result that happened in October
Haha, did exactly the same thing.FFS had 11/11 this morning, why did I change Mata, Blnd, Martial to Darmian Carrick and Rashford
Wasn't expecting them to play with Niang, Deeney and Zárate. They're seem a bit light in midfield, though.To me Watford is a team with a lot of muscles. Not a lot of players in that squad with a normal weight and they've already offloaded some of their biggest weights.
We'll need to play the ball quickly and accurately. Deeney is extremely difficult to handle and I fully understand why the chinese wanted to buy him for 30m pounds. He could easily trick and outmuscle guys like Bailly and Smalling.
So what/who are we going to blame if we don't win?
I mean it probably means nothing but some of the people I know at university come from Southampton and Shaw's got a bit of a reputation for having a pretty bad attitude inside and outside of football.14:09SAMUEL LUCKHURST
Another warning for Shaw
Luke Shaw is conspicuous by his absence again. It’s not a surprise but, purely due to the player’s qualities, he remains a talking point. He’s fit, he’s training and he’s not being selected. It’s clearly nothing to do with Mourinho protecting the player.
There have been murmurings suggesting Shaw’s attitude isn’t to Mourinho’s liking and there are ongoing concerns over his conditioning.
In a team without a first-choice left-back, the natural left-back doesn’t get a look-in.
Blind at LB.Lack of Carrick.
Blind.So what/who are we going to blame if we don't win?
I mean it probably means nothing but some of the people I know at university come from Southampton and Shaw's got a bit of a reputation for having a pretty bad attitude inside and outside of football.
True.Most Chelsea fans do.
Robert Madley