We controlled the midfield despite of McTominay not because of him. I'm all for giving players credit when they play well, I was adamant that Dalot wasn't fit for purpose in the Summer and gave him credit when he turned it around in the first half of the season. I just don't see it with Scott. He was there but not doing much which is the usual shit with Scott. Bruno for example had 95 passes compared to McTominays 31. Before you say "that's not his job", what would Eriksens or Casemiros passing numbers be like if they were on the pitch tonight? This is what Scott has to try and become , this should be our standard and he's got simply no chance. He's never once displayed those type of passing numbers in a game before.
I don't even think we were all that good tonight and rode our luck at times. We didn't create many chances and nor did we prevent Brentford from making chances either, in fact I'd argue they had the best chance of the game with the 1 on 1 with De Gea.
You literally don't have to support the players through the good and the bad, that's just top red nonsense. Just like you'd give the Manager grief after bad results, you are allowed to critise players who are also way out of their depth and not putting the effort in. That's pretty much the entire point of being a supporter. That might be harsh on players, but it's always been the case at United and for whatever reason our standards since Sir Alex retired have dropped to the point that these out of depth players have become mainstays in our first eleven and that simply isn't acceptable. He should be one of the first names to be sold this Summer as he just isn't fit for purpose. I like the guy, he's got good heart but he's just not good enough at really, anything. I couldn't pick out one strength in his game.