amolbhatia50k
Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
I’m disappointed by how slow we seem to be moving under the new regime. All the groundwork for the summer had to be done before the season ended.
Is it a fact or is it a newspaper claim that we've done a complete different thing?Its funny how INEOS came in and barked alot. "We will decide on the playstyle"... proceed to interview managers who all have different play styles.
So what they say and do is a complete different thing. Its almost as if they will decide on the playstyle depending on who they chose as manager... so no different to the Glazers.
Well its not just a newspaper claim, reputable journalists have claimed we have been intereviewing managers.Is it a fact or is it a newspaper claim that we've done a complete different thing?
Still a newspaper claim, then.Well its not just a newspaper claim, reputable journalists have claimed we have been intereviewing managers.
Oh so you think they are reviewing the managers position for 2 weeks without thinking of another manager?Still a newspaper claim, then.
Not sure why people are getting their panties in a twist over unconfirmed reports.
It's the easiest thing in the world to write articles about Manchester United. I'm surprised there aren't more Southgate related rumors given the attention it's getting on here. Piss easy to see what fans are focusing on and what will get attention.
Come on man we know who the reliable journalists are. They're not getting that wrong.Still a newspaper claim, then.
Not sure why people are getting their panties in a twist over unconfirmed reports.
It's the easiest thing in the world to write articles about Manchester United. I'm surprised there aren't more Southgate related rumors given the attention it's getting on here. Piss easy to see what fans are focusing on and what will get attention.
Shocking journalist. For some reason he reminds me of Shaun Ryder.
Nope, he wants INEOS to come out and name the candidates they have interviewed for him to believe they are looking at other candidates.Come on man we know who the reliable journalists are. They're not getting that wrong.
He's twisting my melon man.
I was driving all weekend and decided to listen to Rantbridge to kill time. It's hard not agree with him:Its funny how INEOS came in and barked alot. "We will decide on the playstyle"... proceed to interview managers who all have different play styles.
So what they say and do is a complete different thing. Its almost as if they will decide on the playstyle depending on who they chose as manager... so no different to the Glazers.
Yep, so total opposite to what they set out at the start?I was driving all weekend and decided to listen to Rantbridge to kill time. It's hard not agree with him:
=> the reason INEOS are talking to other managers is that they want a guy to get the best out of current group of players
=> which indicates there is no money for the rebuild and Ineos wants to maximize the out put of current lot
=>Glazernomics 2.0
He's a boring bastard isn't he?
There's also a lot of bullshit floating around from clueless journalists and sources. They held a meeting recently with Tuchel most likely, what else is there aside from various random links to managers? The fact that Gareth Southgate is apparently in the running pretty much highlights the amount of nonsense that's being reported.Very good point.
At the moment INEOS are looking a bit all over the place. The talk was there would be a plan/philosphy that we would want to take the club forward with. Yet the fact they are talking to so many different types of managers who have different styles seems like its more of the same that we had under the Glazers. I'm keeping my thoughts to myself on INEOS to give them a fair crack at the whip but what they are saying in regards to where they want to take the club from a playing standpoint versus their actions of not seeming to know what style of manager they want is not matching up. I'll judge them on their actions. Also, since when has it been okay for our club to treat a manager like this? Either let him go or tell him he has another year, not only does it make them seem like they are indecisive but its extremely disrespectful to a Manchester United manager.
The guy is stoned off his face again isn't he.
So Ratcliffe rules himself out of the job then? How the feck can you deliver such horribly written stuff for a major news outlet?Sir Jim Ratcliffe held exploratory discussions with Thomas Tuchel last week regarding potentially replacing Erik ten Hag as Manchester United’s manager but has ruled himself out of the job.
Getting the best out of the players you have is the bare minimum requirement for the job. Just because Ten Hag couldn't do it doesn't mean it's a bad idea or that we have no money.I was driving all weekend and decided to listen to Rantbridge to kill time. It's hard not agree with him:
=> the reason INEOS are talking to other managers is that they want a guy to get the best out of current group of players
=> which indicates there is no money for the rebuild and Ineos wants to maximize the out put of current lot
=>Glazernomics 2.0
Couldn’t agree moreI can't remember another club doing something like this end of season where a manager is left in limbo, being undermined to an INSANE degree.
Why are we always such a mess, finding new ways to look incompetent. How in gods name can they turn around and back him now, and expect any players - current or potential - to believe he has any authority whatsoever
Why does he keep referring to ETH as Ezza? And what's with the elongated words? Is he having a mid-life crisis?Ezza ten H
As opposed to a manager who doesn't get the best out of his players?I was driving all weekend and decided to listen to Rantbridge to kill time. It's hard not agree with him:
=> the reason INEOS are talking to other managers is that they want a guy to get the best out of current group of players
=> which indicates there is no money for the rebuild and Ineos wants to maximize the out put of current lot
=>Glazernomics 2.0
I don't think they're reviewing the managers position with the possibility of sacking him this summer. That's about it.Oh so you think they are reviewing the managers position for 2 weeks without thinking of another manager?
Maybe they are just drinking tea and deciding on style of play before looking at the manager they want?
Why would you review and leave the current manager in limbo if you dont plan on sacking him.I don't think they're reviewing the managers position with the possibility of sacking him this summer. That's about it.
Don't be such a square.Why does he keep referring to ETH as Ezza? And what's with the elongated words? Is he having a mid-life crisis?
His tweets seem like someone trying to be 'hip' and 'cool' but just ends up looking even more uncool.
The use of the word hip isn’t helping your argument mate.Why does he keep referring to ETH as Ezza? And what's with the elongated words? Is he having a mid-life crisis?
His tweets seem like someone trying to be 'hip' and 'cool' but just ends up looking even more uncool.
Well if it obvious to you then it would be even more apparent to Ten Hag if (as has been claimed) they were giving him advice that was leading to injuries.Yeah....which is why its being addressed.....whats your point
Hence the use of inverted commas for ironic emphasis.The use of the word hip isn’t helping your argument mate.
I've read this 4 times
I am drunk and I cant get Manutd out my head...I've read this 4 times
Can someone translate?
Seems to have given up on the English language completely now. I have no idea what he’s trying to say here. Clown
Phew! I was worried for a minute there that old Jim might fancy pulling a bit of a Knighton!So Ratcliffe rules himself out of the job then?
Although I agree with him, who talks/tweets like this?
ChatGPT
There should be a minimum requirement to get a blue tick on X/twitter to at least be reasonably coherent. This guy needs to be put on ignore.
Although I agree with him, who talks/tweets like this?
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date