gormless
Full Member
Innocent of everything. Without a club. What could he even do career wise now? Innocent in the eyes of the law, but surely no European club is going to touch him
Innocent of everything. Without a club. What could he even do career wise now? Innocent in the eyes of the law, but surely no European club is going to touch him
Going to be difficult for him finding a decent club having not played in 2 years.
Wouldn't say that's weird.Call me weird but I like to think a society should give 2nd chances to people, especially those who weren't even found guilty of something.
Call me weird but I like to think a society should give 2nd chances to people, especially those who weren't even found guilty of something.
Personally i am not for giving 2nd chance to people who do disgusting crimes. Rapists and murderers should be jailed for life. Even sick bastards who brutally beat someone.Call me weird but I like to think a society should give 2nd chances to people, especially those who weren't even found guilty of something.
Rape cases are incredibly hard to convict criminally. Especially against celebrities who have far more resources. Nobody should assume they were lying IMO.So what was the whole situation with him about? Was it dozens of women lying about rape or did they just have no evidence of rape for any of these cases?
Surely of all the 10 or something charges there would be some sort of legitimate evidence? I read there were seven women involved. How did none of them have any convincing evidence for even 1 conviction? Robinho got convicted so it's not always the case that rich people (or footballers in this case) get off simply because they've got money.Rape cases are incredibly hard to convict criminally. Especially against celebrities who have far more resources. Nobody should assume they were lying IMO.
I mean if you don't have video evidence of incident or instant police filings showing the bruising then you pretty much have no chance to convict beyond doubt. Even with a lot of women. An example is they could have been slipped something that they didn't intend to take, and maybe they originally thought it was weird but put it down to just getting very drunk, and then later thinking about it and thinking they may have been in fact date raped. It's a huge grey area of things that could (and often do) happen.Surely of all the 10 or something charges there would be some sort of legitimate evidence? I read there were seven women involved. How did none of them have any convincing evidence for even 1 conviction? Robinho got convicted so it's not always the case that rich people (or footballers in this case) get off simply because they've got money.
Rape cases are incredibly hard to convict criminally. Especially against celebrities who have far more resources. Nobody should assume they were lying IMO.
No. But you don't assume they're lying either. You're just stuck with a big messy situation unfortunately. Or if you want to go based on the statistics that show the vast majority of rape accusations are true, but still not convicted? At the end of the day it is someone's word (or in this case, multiple people's) against somebody elses.So we’ve to assume he’s guilty then? Despite the jury saying otherwise?
The new details that were published in the Guardian add some important context and give the impression that the whole thing was a setup.Rape cases are incredibly hard to convict criminally. Especially against celebrities who have far more resources. Nobody should assume they were lying IMO.
Innocent of everything. Without a club. What could he even do career wise now? Innocent in the eyes of the law, but surely no European club is going to touch him
Rape cases are incredibly hard to convict criminally. Especially against celebrities who have far more resources. Nobody should assume they were lying IMO.
No. But you don't assume they're lying either. You're just stuck with a big messy situation unfortunately. Or if you want to go based on the statistics that show the vast majority of rape accusations are true, but still not convicted? At the end of the day it is someone's word (or in this case, multiple people's) against somebody elses.
Instead of calling him a rapist, you can say he's been accused of rape in the past. Instead of calling potential rape victims liars, you can say they've made rape accusations in the past. Because that's the best anyone can do in this situation without lying/taking sides without knowing anything/insulting potential victims/fully exonerating potential rapists.
Enough of this already. We took Ronaldo back, played him as did Real Madrid with his past. This debate is going absolutely nowhere. Other than moving another step closer to the Stasi.Same thing in the eyes of the public.
imagine applying for a job, don’t worry I’m not a rapist I’ve just been accused in the past.
Yeah but difference with Greenwood is the publicity of the evidence, it is much less grey that Greenwood is a scumbag.
Yeah but is that wrong?The reaction to Mendy getting back to playing and what it will be when Greenwood does are going up be poles apart.
Yeah but is that wrong?
Happy for him. feck the which hunting Karen’s on Twitter. Not guilty.
One was found not guilty by two juries of his peers. The other had his case dropped after breaking conditions of his bail to contact the victim. There’s also audio evidence of Greenwood committing the alleged crime inOf course it is.
No. But you don't assume they're lying either. You're just stuck with a big messy situation unfortunately. Or if you want to go based on the statistics that show the vast majority of rape accusations are true, but still not convicted? At the end of the day it is someone's word (or in this case, multiple people's) against somebody elses.
Instead of calling him a rapist, you can say he's been accused of rape in the past. Instead of calling potential rape victims liars, you can say they've made rape accusations in the past. Because that's the best anyone can do in this situation without lying/taking sides without knowing anything/insulting potential victims/fully exonerating potential rapists.
One was found not guilty by two juries of his peers. The other had his case dropped after breaking conditions of his bail to contact the victim. There’s also audio evidence of Greenwood committing the alleged crime in
the public domain.
It’s pretty clear why one would draw more outrage than the other, no?
But you brought him up!
But you brought him up!