AlexUTD
Full Member
Why are we sharing tweets from Sport? might aswell share tweets from Caughtoffside and Indykaila etc.
'Course you 'ave!I’m obviously being sarcastic
You missed a hall of fame caf post earlier on in the thread
The United megastore, presumablyWhere can I buy some of that?
At the door, mate!Where can I buy some of that?
'Course you 'ave!
Unfortunately you've now reached the stage where you aren't allowed to delight in sarcasm anymore without sending posters into a frenzy.
Has it been deleted.
Any quotes
I said hang in there, not hang yourself.
Need a good source of laughter in here that's what Sport brings. They've flip flopped their way through this saga, sayingWhy are we sharing tweets from Sport? might aswell share tweets from Caughtoffside and Indykaila etc.
No... its literally just Sport that's saying this and they've been throwing the same stuff around for weeks with no other journos reporting it or even mentioning it.
Chelsea journos are silent on the matter, they've not said a word about it and you'd expect them to say something wouldn't you?
Chelsea are about to hijack us!
Oh no!Chelsea are about to hijack us!
Chelsea are about to hijack us!
Chelsea are about to hijack us!
Manchester City total spent to date: £97.9m
Who the very f@ck are Sport Witness. Is this some website set up by someone's Uncle Alfred in his garden shed? Just looked at them and anyone claiming "global football intelligence" sounds like a pompous arse to me. evidence: in their PL drop down, they list Hull City! And this is one of their "intelligent" headlines:
Club ‘intensifying contacts’ with Manchester United for signing – ETH has decision to make
I believe that Sport are a pro Barca outlet but I'm not totally sure. It's been said they report what Barca tell them too, but i don't really know.Are Sport considered a pro - X team paper? I.e Are they pro Madrid or Barca? People seem to think they hate us at United but is it just anti-Barca stuff? Or is it just a good story that gets more clicks than any other due to involving both Barca and Utd, so they are just making as much money out of it as possible themselves?
I don't bother following, but I imagine they have no information at all on the situation regarding us and Frenkie/Barca. It makes me wonder if there is an ulterior motive. If De Jong stays while refusing a paycut I presume it royally fu**s Barcelona's plans up and screws up player registrations going forward. Could they just be praying we move on, knowing Chelsea have no interest, leaving Barca without a buyer or any negotiating power with regard to Frenkie's contract.. Got to wonder who Sport actually dislike with this.
Or maybe they are actually just right, Chelsea are moving Jorginho on discretely and replacing him with Frenkie, while we get left with out pants down? It's a really strange story given the lack of corroboration elsewhere..
It's already a classic thread. Whether it happens or not is irrelevant at this stage, the thread has crossed over.
Hoping its not the case - as per the quote below
But what's all this Chelsea talk now? FDJ to Chelsea, Kante to United?
Need a good source of laughter in here that's what Sport brings. They've flip flopped their way through this saga, saying
de Jong wants Chelsea and will do everything to make it happen
then he doesn't even want to consider Chelsea,
to If he leaves he only wants United and United are his priority
Then it's he has no intention of joining United and he wants to stay
Now it's back to if he HAS to leave, it's only Chelsea and he's no intention of going to United.
Give it a few hours and he'll hate Chelsea again and want to stay at all costs. Simple fact is, looking at everything going on, Chelsea aren't even in for him, they showed interest but that's it. Plus with Barca hijacking and taking 2 players from under their noses, do you really see them helping Barca out by forking out €85m for a player they don't even need?? Makes no sense at all
FdJ isn't stupid. He will know that Chelsea are about as certain of CL football as United going forward. 1 season isn't what you would base your future on. Only teams that currently are 95% guaranteed to be in the CL each season are City and Liverpool.
Ahhh, so that's the stuff they were handing out free the last time I was there!The United megastore, presumably
Are Sport considered a pro - X team paper? I.e Are they pro Madrid or Barca? People seem to think they hate us at United but is it just anti-Barca stuff? Or is it just a good story that gets more clicks than any other due to involving both Barca and Utd, so they are just making as much money out of it as possible themselves?
I don't bother following, but I imagine they have no information at all on the situation regarding us and Frenkie/Barca. It makes me wonder if there is an ulterior motive. If De Jong stays while refusing a paycut I presume it royally fu**s Barcelona's plans up and screws up player registrations going forward. Could they just be praying we move on, knowing Chelsea have no interest, leaving Barca without a buyer or any negotiating power with regard to Frenkie's contract.. Got to wonder who Sport actually dislike with this.
Or maybe they are actually just right, Chelsea are moving Jorginho on discretely and replacing him with Frenkie, while we get left with out pants down? It's a really strange story given the lack of corroboration elsewhere..
This observation deserves more loveHe should join us. Our players do that without even needing to be told.
If he’s watched any of their pre-season he may rather just choose to be 8th choice CB at Barca.FdJ isn't stupid. He will know that Chelsea are about as certain of CL football as United going forward. 1 season isn't what you would base your future on. Only teams that currently are 95% guaranteed to be in the CL each season are City and Liverpool.
Who the very f@ck are Sport Witness. Is this some website set up by someone's Uncle Alfred in his garden shed? Just looked at them and anyone claiming "global football intelligence" sounds like a pompous arse to me. evidence: in their PL drop down, they list Hull City! And this is one of their "intelligent" headlines:
Club ‘intensifying contacts’ with Manchester United for signing – ETH has decision to make
Lolz
feck me, Haaland alone cost a shed tonne more than that.
Didn’t his dad want paying 50m or something insane? As well as a huge agent fee…Lolz
feck me, Haaland alone cost a shed tonne more than that.
Not a hope. Raiola had this negotiated before he passed away- there is no way that he would not have milked an oil club for an insane signing on fee (£60m minimum) and a similarly high agent fee. Also, whatever his reported wages are you can probably quadruple them - the Sheikhs pay a lot off the books (refer to Mancini).His 'official' transfer figure is £51.2m (€60m release clause widely reported). With agents fees and bonuses it may reach about £85m.
What’s newbie got to do with anything? I hate that term when used as a condescending comment. The amount of posts made on a forum doesn’t determine your IQ or social standing.
His 'official' transfer figure is £51.2m (€60m release clause widely reported). With agents fees and bonuses it may reach about £85m.
So you prefer body shaming to the use of the word cuckold? Text
Certainly picking up a bit.This thread has nearly everything now, Godwin’s Law is surely just around the corner.
How do people still not know what Sports Witness are and who Sport represent.
Let’s be honest, Chelsea can’t even get a player to sign an autograph this summer so far, let alone a contract.
The Boehly franchise start up isn’t that appealing at the moment.