That's an interesting point. I think the reason is that a lot of people tend to enjoy dissecting and understanding the craft of coaching itself. There are endless discussions about the vision of the likes of Cruyff, Sacchi and many others and how they viewed the game. That's something that a lot genuinely enjoy. There are those on the other hand who see the coach as nothing more than an employee and that the final product is all that matters. I guess with the former, when it comes to coaches like Zidane, there is always the feeling of "yea but what is his stamp on this team, what is his own vision and how can it be detected." It's a bit like film directors, there are those whose movies all have a clear touch, they almost dominate their work with their own style and there are those who sit back and merely transfer the story, actors, effects, etc ... to the audience. The former tend to get much more recognition and respect.I would say the problem with some very tactical oriented coaches in squads full of quality is that they limit the talent of their players and kill off their creativity. To get the best of such personalities some balance is needed, and that's why certain coaches and Real Madrid don't mix up well together. For some reason managers who can provide the balance are somewhat seen in a worse light than those who are intransigent and very tactical. We often see coaches being questioned on whether they would make it in smaller clubs but never the contrary. As we saw with the case of Moyes, the profiles needed for each enviroment are very different.