Cantona07
Full Member
What do you guys think of Fergie's decision to Substitute RVN who is our main goal scoring hope with Forlan who is struggling to get goals when we played Leeds????
Originally posted by marchingontogether:
<strong>Great substitution in my opinion </strong><hr></blockquote>
Which no-one asked for.
Originally posted by WeasteDevil:
<strong>Bringing Solskjaer on is always a strange substitution from SAF! </strong><hr></blockquote>
Yes. Because he should start.
Originally posted by Cantona07:
<strong>What do you guys think of Fergie's decision to Substitute RVN who is our main goal scoring hope with Forlan who is struggling to get goals when we played Leeds????</strong><hr></blockquote>
Strange to say the least.
I thought he would have gone 3 at the back and put Forlan on aswell.
Originally posted by Livvie20:
<strong>
Yes. Because he should start. </strong><hr></blockquote>
Quite the opposite, he should start with RVN and Forlan and then bring Ole on. We might win a few games then.
Originally posted by WeasteDevil:
<strong>
Quite the opposite, he should start with RVN and Forlan and then bring Ole on. We might win a few games then. </strong><hr></blockquote>
And what has Forlan done to suggest that he should start alongside RVN instead of Ole ? Unfortunatley Diego has looked totally ineffective in just about all his appearances so far, he doesn't do anything particularly well especially in trying to find the back of the net - an horrendous error to think he could take Cole's place. Incidentally I looked up a biographical insert on Forlan which was a couple of years old whilst he was with Independiente - it described him as a "playmaker" and not a striker. Did Fergie really know what he was buying ? - I think not.
Originally posted by tareq abd albari:
<strong>Regarding Forlan, i saw a video of some of the goals he scored when he was n Argentina,,,some of them pure class, breath taking,,he is got pace (or used to) ....god knows what happened to him when he came to England </strong><hr></blockquote>
he's not exactly started many matches..
maybe he needs a decent run in the team.
Originally posted by Forza Viola:
<strong>
Ole and Ruud don't exactly give defenders a hard time do they? They may be great individually but together their movement is far too predictable and defenders can mark them with relative ease.
Forlan or Giggs down the middle may carry no goal threat, but they do cause the defenders problems and create space for (the now absent) Keane and Scholes to surge into the box.</strong><hr></blockquote>
Ole and Ruud need some decent service IMO. At the moment they are not in top form but none of the other players are!! Opposing defenders are standing behind our strikers knowing that a half decent cross will come from the half pitch. Hardly an easy life for a striker. Lets start playing with wingers (or wing backs, if you like) and getting grosses from where the defenders don't like them - the touchline and goals will come. Another problem is that the creativity of our central midfield is below zero so far.
Originally posted by Forza Viola:
<strong>The point is no matter how bad Forlan's form is at least he can move with a bit of pace and agility. Ruud especially looks very sluggish and that is, in my opinion, why he isn't looking at all dangerous this season. Carrying a wee bit of weight in my book, either that or a minor injury.
.</strong><hr></blockquote>
Fen hell. He got past Leeds defenders twice and put the ball on target. When has Forlan ever put him self in that position. I've seen him more often at RB. There is noway RVN should have been taken off.
Originally posted by darko:
<strong>
Fen hell. He got past Leeds defenders twice and put the ball on target. When has Forlan ever put him self in that position. I've seen him more often at RB. There is noway RVN should have been taken off.</strong><hr></blockquote>
Right - I thought Ruud was by far our most dangerous player, causing Leeds all sorts of problems. I don't know what it did for his morale to be taken off but he certainly showed clearly that he was not happy. All chances of us getting the goal back disappeared when he went - what was fergie thinking of ?
Originally posted by Julian Denny:
<strong>
And what has Forlan done to suggest that he should start alongside RVN instead of Ole ? Unfortunatley Diego has looked totally ineffective in just about all his appearances so far, he doesn't do anything particularly well especially in trying to find the back of the net - an horrendous error to think he could take Cole's place. Incidentally I looked up a biographical insert on Forlan which was a couple of years old whilst he was with Independiente - it described him as a "playmaker" and not a striker. Did Fergie really know what he was buying ? - I think not.</strong><hr></blockquote>
We should have kept Yorke Dont you think
Originally posted by pizzu:
<strong>
Ole and Ruud need some decent service IMO. At the moment they are not in top form but none of the other players are!! Opposing defenders are standing behind our strikers knowing that a half decent cross will come from the half pitch. Hardly an easy life for a striker. Lets start playing with wingers (or wing backs, if you like) and getting grosses from where the defenders don't like them - the touchline and goals will come. Another problem is that the creativity of our central midfield is below zero so far.</strong><hr></blockquote>
Agreed. I'd really like to see Becks stay on the right and start putting in thoses crosses like he used to in 98/99.
After Leeds scored, I was hoping Forlan would come on, but I was really surprised to see Ruud's number come up. I don't see why both of them couldn't have played...why we didn't just have 3 strikers. I really felt like we had nothing to lose at that point.
Originally posted by Cantona07:
<strong>We should have let Borough sign Forlan. And probably should have let Yorke get his form back or else we should have spent that 7.2mil on a defender. But this is all done now so why not let Forlan go on loan back where he came from and lets see how SAF's new plan to play Scholes as a Striker works </strong><hr></blockquote>
I think that Forlan is put under the pressure of first team football too fast. Liverpool keep Baros in the reserve to learn the trade and let him settle in a much less pressure environment, and now they start to get the best from him. However, Fergie threw a youngster signed from SA without any European football experience immediately into the first team as a third striker, which is just doing harm to his confidence and his growth.
Originally posted by Beckham007:
<strong>I think it needed to be done because we looked very stale in the 2nd half.
Perhaps he could have taken off OGS but with him who knows, because he can turn around a game in an instant.
I just cant wait for Diego to score his 1st goal because I truly belive that after that he is going to really fire !</strong><hr></blockquote>
Don't know about that.
After 23 games or whatever, he should have scored at least one, even if in a lot of those games he came on late.
He's bound to score eventually, even Phil Neville has done that. But I wouldn't bank on a goal rush. So far he hasn't come across as a natural striker to me - his positioning isn't that of a striker. On Saturday, he should have been up there in the final third, but he wasn't - he seems more comfortable midfield.
We should have tried for Gudjohnsen. Or Robbie Keane - though I can't see Leeds selling us another top player, or United with two R.Keanes, bearing in mind the history there.
Originally posted by Cantona07:
<strong>We should have let Borough sign Forlan. And probably should have let Yorke get his form back or else we should have spent that 7.2mil on a defender. But this is all done now so why not let Forlan go on loan back where he came from and lets see how SAF's new plan to play Scholes as a Striker works </strong><hr></blockquote>
you should have let 'boro sign forlan and gone for maccarone instead. . .
Originally posted by michael owen's mum:
<strong>
you should have let 'boro sign forlan and gone for maccarone instead. . .</strong><hr></blockquote>
maccarone didn't impress me a lot neither. He is not world class or anything close to it. It's just that he is basically an average PL standard striker and Boro is starting to play good football this season, so he can definitely get a couple of goals. On the other hand, I just don't think Forlan look like a striker at all.
Originally posted by Livvie20:
<strong>If Diego Forlan was playing for Liverpool, not one person on here would be doing anything other than laugh their socks off.
All this sanctimonious "give him a chance" crap. Get behind the players by all means, but there's definitely double standards at work here.
.</strong><hr></blockquote>
Are we allowed say such things?? Sarcralidge
Ban this person from Redcafe - Plastic Fan she is.
Originally posted by bazalini:
<strong>
Are we allowed say such things?? Sarcralidge
Ban this person from Redcafe - Plastic Fan she is.</strong><hr></blockquote>
Get back to the bogs.
NB: This is no kind of racist comment. I mean of course that Baz should stick to what he does best, namely cleaning public loos.
Originally posted by uranushk1:
<strong>
maccarone didn't impress me a lot neither. He is not world class or anything close to it. It's just that he is basically an average PL standard striker and Boro is starting to play good football this season, so he can definitely get a couple of goals. On the other hand, I just don't think Forlan look like a striker at all.</strong>
<hr></blockquote>
He isn't. He was described in SA as a "playmaker" who scored quite frequently and sometimes spectacularly. Someone told Martin Ferguson that he was "the next Klinsmann" although the other comment that he tended to "snatch at chances" seemed to have been overlooked. Apart from that there does not seem to have been a lot of research done on the lad.
Originally posted by michael owen's mum:
<strong>
you should have let 'boro sign forlan and gone for maccarone instead. . .</strong><hr></blockquote>
I think we'd stick with Forlan