Member 5225
Guest
Been totally out of touch for the last couple of months or so, last thing I remember was that the Undertaker was back and scared the hell out of that Booker T guy...anything interesting happen since?
for a month?a_devil_inside said:Undertaker is still fighting Booker T
You haven't missed much at all
hmmm cheers!!a_devil_inside said:Bradshaw is still fighting Eddie Guerrero. He even managed to give eddies mother a "heart attack"
Kurt Angle is a jack in the box with some big ugly dude pushing him around in his wheelchair
Smackdown has been poor altogether
Raw has been better
can't think of anything else
hehe really? that should be fun!!crappycraperson said:apparently dudleys have kidnapped paul bearer !
Modelled him on Bush,haven't they?Dominant said:Smakdown! really sucks currently..
It's depending on Eddie to anchor the show, and he's not doing a very good job.
Moreover, they don't have enough "baddies". Bradshow is a joke.
why don u post themDONADO said:Modelled him on Bush,haven't they?
Oh and while I totally agree about the plastic bitches Wolfboy..I still suggest you look at Torrie's playboy pics
Simpler still,I'll post a thread in the Admn Mod forum saying BAN ME! BAN ME!crappycraperson said:why don u post them
Dominant said:Smakdown! really sucks currently..
It's depending on Eddie to anchor the show, and he's not doing a very good job.
Moreover, they don't have enough "baddies". Bradshow is a joke.
randy420 said:psh! you losers, wrestling's fake.
It's hard for Eddie to do a good job anchoring the show when their #1 heel is Bradshaw. Even the most gifted, talented wrestler would have trouble anchoring a show while feuding with Bradshaw.
oh, and how stupid is Eugene on Raw? God dammit that whole thing is just pissing me off
YianniArvani said:Get stone cold wrestling again. His neck couldnt be that bad, the injury occurred ages ago !
Bury Red said:It's not like the ballet dancing, steroidal nonces actually touch each other anway is it?
Bring back Big Daddy and Mick McManus, at least they knew it was a panto. This American shite is like The A Team without the humour and the explosions and certainly doesn't belong in the Other Sports forum.
redstar1 said:Don't be so hard on it.... oh, by the way, we know its not real, noone pretends it is ... its a soap opera and a couple of years ago it was probably the best thing on tv.
At the best of times its emotional, infuriating, spectacular and a source of inspiration (see Wrestlemania). At the worst of times its boring, slow and verging on pornographic/
Bury Red said:If you know it's not real what's the point. As for soap opera, I can just about hack Corrie and Eastenders where the acting and script occasionally produce the odd gems but I don't see the point in the rest of them though. If yank wrestling is supposed to be a soap opera though, it's even worse than all the Aussie tripe and probably ranks alongside "The Bold and The Beautiful" and similar trash. If that was the best thing you could find on TV, turn it off and go out, read a book, listen to some music or get a DVD of one of the millions of class films out there which are both entertaining and legitimately entitled to refer to themselves as art.
I'm sorry I just don't see the point in this sort of drivel and genuinely believe it is contributing to the dumbing down of our already stupid society.
Bury Red said:If you know it's not real what's the point. As for soap opera, I can just about hack Corrie and Eastenders where the acting and script occasionally produce the odd gems but I don't see the point in the rest of them though. If yank wrestling is supposed to be a soap opera though, it's even worse than all the Aussie tripe and probably ranks alongside "The Bold and The Beautiful" and similar trash. If that was the best thing you could find on TV, turn it off and go out, read a book, listen to some music or get a DVD of one of the millions of class films out there which are both entertaining and legitimately entitled to refer to themselves as art.
I'm sorry I just don't see the point in this sort of drivel and genuinely believe it is contributing to the dumbing down of our already stupid society.
Wolfboy said:spot on Bury Red, i said similar things in another post. there is no positive to be drawn from this lowest common denominator.
How can you people invest time in this bilge?
Still thinking of a name said:Obviously, its something we enjoy watching. Therefore its something we must invest time into - Just because you don't like it, doesn't mean others don't, or shouldn't.
Wolfboy said:At no point do i say you shouldn't, but it remains a mystery to me that anyone does. I would say that there is nothing positive to be drawn from it. What is inspirational about oversized freaks acting out choreographed violence.
I don't see the comedy, there is no acting talent what so ever (established star or 'wooden newbies'), the women are even worse andthere are much more spectacular and impressive examples of physical exertion out there to see.
If you really count watching the 'women' on there as porn you really should go out and meet some real girls.
Still thinking of a name said:Where did I ever say porn? Sorry, I think you are on the outside of the whole pr0n thing.
Nobody watches it to get acting tips. However wrestlers have somehow managed to get acting parts - Some big, so obviously there is a small amount of acting talent there.
Its light hearted comedy at its best and boring tripe at its worst - But its tv and there are more pointless shows.
Wolfboy said:yeah, sorry, i thought it was a typing mistake there. fair enough.
but i have to take you up on the acting bit. No wrestler has got a part in a film based on acting talent; they are just weak attempts by the movie makers to wring a bit more cash from the ready dumbed down wrestling audience by putting their fav stars on the screen.
If you think that there has been a good performance by a wrestler then you must like the work of the great actors Van Dam, Segal and Diesel.
Still thinking of a name said:If they can't act at all, they would not be in the movie - At all. Sure, its mostly for their fame and face or whatever but they are obviously good enough for the parts they are given, otherwise they simply wouldn't get the parts.
De Niro, Willis and Affleck might have ben better examples don't you think? Or did you use the above because they are simply action film actors?
Wolfboy said:
I was being sarcastic. I was suggesting that wrestlers do not get their parts because they can act but instead because people who are amused by loud noises and shiny things will go and watch the film because they are in it.
I think your response says more for my argument than I could ever say.
Still thinking of a name said:Then you are right - But its the same for all action films, its not the acting that matters but the overall gimmik which is something wrestlers have often been doing for decades before getting a part in a film.
redstar1 said:There is talk of Triple H getting a part in the new Conan movie, and this is of course based on his image.
Melbourne Red said:It also amazes me that in some cases these blokes are willing to fall from turnbuckles, ladders, cages and even balconies onto tables or concrete floors, risking life and limb all in the name of entertainment. For this reason alone I think wrestling deserves some sort of affirmation as a legitimate artform.