Weakest Link last night

Suedesi

Full Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2001
Messages
24,360
Location
New York City
Certainly Ryan Giggs imo.

Ruud had a bad game also, although he just came back from injury.

Paul Scholes was fantastic.
 
Id say Ruud.

He missed a few decent chances that could have settled the players earlier.

Giggs didnt do that bad.

You just dont like Welsh people
 
Problem is basically we're not taking chances - especially early ones. We saw how the game opened up once we've scored twice, and if Beckham (From a super Veron pass) or Ruud would have buried their early chances the match would have been different.

I doubt if the final score would convince other teams that doing an everton and playing for a point is a wrong move against us.
 
Originally posted by paulengland:
<strong>Id say Ruud.

He missed a few decent chances that could have settled the players earlier.

Giggs didnt do that bad.

You just dont like Welsh people</strong><hr></blockquote>

I was frustrated with Giggs; his last touch was worrisome last night.
 
Originally posted by Suedesi:
<strong>Certainly Ryan Giggs imo.

Ruud had a bad game also, although he just came back from injury.

Paul Scholes was fantastic.</strong><hr></blockquote>

Was he worse than Veron?

I think not

Even the Dutch commentator could not resist saying how shit Veron was last night
 
Mickey Silvestre had an unsually bad game. Seemed unsure, hesitated and got caught with the ball a couple of times. Passed the ball straight to the opposition too, on more than one occasion.

But we won, who cares.

And let's not forget the contribution Mickey made to some of the goals earlier in the season with his runs down the wing.

Ruud, probably not match fit, but what about his penalties? Keepers know he loves tucking it to their right-side, but he still manages to beat them with pace. Fingers crossed, long may that continue.
 
I thought Silvestre was the weakest link last night. He did nothing well all night from what i can remember.

Thought Veron was poor last night as well. That was his first bad game of the season though.
 
Ruud wasnt up to his usual standard but he wasnt 100% fit.When he misses you can see how p'ed off he is with himself,he really does want it( <img src="graemlins/smirk.gif" border="0" alt="[Smirk]" /> ).Lets face it,an unfir Ruud would still be the best player in a lot of prem teams.
Ryan had a bad game but as above.
We should have been about 7-0,at times looked like we'd go 0-0.
3 goals,3 points and no injuries :cool: (who was Ruud blowing kisses too? <img src="graemlins/nervous.gif" border="0" alt="[Nervous]" /> ;) )
 
I had a great seat last night, NT1 just to the right of the half way line.

Most of the team looked tired which was worrying. We created chances but we were too casual in the last third to make them count.

Becks, Giggs, Ruud, Butt and Veron were all below par.

Gary, Larry and JOS were superb. Fab was there when needed.

Special praise reserved for MOM Paul Scholes (he scores goals dont you know), there's no way on this Earth we'd have won without him.

Still not firing on all cylinders but 6 out of 6 is impressive form. Nice break then down to Fulham to keep things rolling.

:D
 
Veron.

yes, below par, but I can't help feeling if it was Thiery Henry at centre forward, he would have got at the end of some of the passes that Veron threaded into the channels.

I'll wash my mouth out with soap now. :)

Seriously, Ruud never seemed to anticipate anything, and looked rather flat footed. He did not even read some of the flick-ons by Giggsy and Scholesy.

But, as has been mentioned before, he's probably not match fit, and may still be feeling his hammy.
 
Originally posted by Rams:
<strong>Veron....

how anyone can say anyone other than Veron is beyond me :rolleyes: </strong><hr></blockquote>

Veron was poor but Mickey was worse. Isn't Mickey carrying an injury at the moment. He played like he was.
 
Originally posted by Rams:
<strong>Veron....

how anyone can say anyone other than Veron is beyond me :rolleyes: </strong><hr></blockquote>

I've come to not expect anything great from Veron. He'll always suffer in Premiership games where the tempo is much faster than in the CL.

Micky is a defender, anything good coming forward is a bonus.

Ryan was abysmal at times. How many times did he get the ball at the byline only to screw up his crosses?

Becks didn't have a good game either, but the guy worked his bollocks off, and at least he tracks down.

Ruud... is unfit. He needs a couple of goals from open play, and he'll be allright.
 
Originally posted by MancFanFromManc:
<strong>

Becks, Giggs, Ruud, Butt and Veron were all below par.

</strong><hr></blockquote>

Veron looked himself to me...
 
I say it is the formation. Against weaker teams and at home, we should play 4-4-2 with Veron on the bench :D
 
Originally posted by Suedesi:
<strong>
Micky is a defender, anything good coming forward is a bonus. </strong><hr></blockquote>

Exactly. When he attacks brilliantly and leave gaps people aren't happy. When he does well defensively and doesn't contribute much to the attack they are still unhappy!
 
I know we scored in the last 5 mins with 3 great goals - and I honour the team for that, and I know David Beckham honoured the crowd during his interview (as they deserved) but bear in mind the following:

None of you seem to be mentioning the fact that Beckham was WAY below par tonight (or I'd say on par with all his WAY below par performances since the middle of last season) - but why does this blindness not surprise me :rolleyes:

Fine we scored 3 goals, but had we been asked our opinions up until the point when Scholes hit the net for the first time, I wonder how different our opinions would have been.

What angered me most about last night was when Beckham was running with the ball, coming inside from the right wing. He didn't even loose posession, and suddenly out of nowhere took a dive. It wasn't just a normal well acted dive, it was an abysmal effort to try and get a free kick in a spot he may have been able to score from. That, to me, is CHEAP. The referee was wise to it (and should have booked him) and the ball ended up being sent up to an Everton player in the United half.

I remember at least 3 times turning to BHManUNut after Beckham had made a cock up saying "Had Veron done that the Red Cafe would have used it to hang his balls." Beckham had some wonderful touches last night, but on a whole was poor.

So in context to this thread and in context to the usuals who are mouthing off about Veron; true to say he played below par, but so did Beckham, and it would be a damn site more refreshing to see some people on here slate him for a change.

Feck at least Veron wasn't attempting to cheat.
 
Originally posted by Amir:
<strong>

Exactly. When he attacks brilliantly and leave gaps people aren't happy. When he does well defensively and doesn't contribute much to the attack they are still unhappy!</strong><hr></blockquote>

It's always like that unfortunately.
 
Mickey has his worst game of the season so far.

Ruud worked hard last nite but it didn't happen for him and his movement was unusually poor in the second half.
 
It should be Veron again, with Giggs and Micky also below par. Anyone who said Beckham played badly is beyond me. I don't see Scholes played any better than him besides the goal, and if that chip from Becks has gone in instead of hitting the bar he would even have been MOM. I didn't have the true statistic, but in my impression Beckham was the player who ran the most, get the ball the most and tried the hardest. I'm angry that some so called "fans" can accuse our own captain as cheater. I know some Veron supporters like to critize everyone else in order to protect Veron, but face it, if Veron has tried half as hard as Beckham yesterday, he would not have lasted only 60 minutes on the field!
 
Originally posted by uranushk1:
<strong>Anyone who said Beckham played badly is beyond me. I didn't have the true statistic, but in my impression Beckham was the player who ran the most, get the ball the most and tried the hardest. </strong><hr></blockquote>At last some sense! Becks ran his bollocks off the whole night. Instead of blaming his crosses, maybe people should accept that our striker/s were rather sluggish. And as you say - had that chip gone in many on here would have been raving about how well he played.
Our best performers were Gaz, O'Shea, Scholes and Becks.
 
Originally posted by Stanley Road:
<strong>

Was he worse than Veron?

I think not

Even the Dutch commentator could not resist saying how shit Veron was last night</strong><hr></blockquote>

Are you saying that Ruud played better than veron? i dont think so.....everyone can score from the penalty spot!....and he was way too selfish! MOM scholes.
 
Originally posted by uranushk1:
<strong>It should be Veron again, with Giggs and Micky also below par. Anyone who said Beckham played badly is beyond me. I don't see Scholes played any better than him besides the goal, and if that chip from Becks has gone in instead of hitting the bar he would even have been MOM. I didn't have the true statistic, but in my impression Beckham was the player who ran the most, get the ball the most and tried the hardest. I'm angry that some so called "fans" can accuse our own captain as cheater. I know some Veron supporters like to critize everyone else in order to protect Veron, but face it, if Veron has tried half as hard as Beckham yesterday, he would not have lasted only 60 minutes on the field!</strong><hr></blockquote>

Becks had a decent game. He wasn't the worst player. He has worked hard since being criticised for only trying for Ingerlund. This apparently happened after the loss to Zalaegerszeg. Agree with you that had that chip gone in, he may well have been made MOM by the media, who are not necessarily the best judges.

Much has been said about Becks' "diving", here and on other forums. However biased we are, he does look like he is "diving", and is ridiculously bad at it.

Giving Becks the benefit of the doubt, could this be a consequence of his last injury? Dare I say it, instead of riding tackles, he leaps high out of a fear of getting badly injured? If this is the reason, couldn't he be just a little less theatrical about it?

I am a big admirer of Veron, and I think it is unfair to pass judgement on him in terms of tackles. Judge him on completion of passes, and, for want of a better word, "assists". The pass to put Mickey in down the wing early in the second half, perhaps only Eric could have done that. And no one said Eric was pants because he could not tackle, or did not work hard enough.

It is also not true that Veron does not try, and has a lower workrate. He always shows for the ball, even when he is not playing well. He may give away possession too easily, but he has too much pride to be accused of not trying.
 
Criticism of how poor Ruud's touch & contribution was is slowly emerging - I'm not surprised as Ruud's always had a poor first touch & for a man of his height & build, he's a very poor targetman. Apart from his goal-getting instincts, he hasn't much else to show.

Ironically, he seemed to have emerged from his faults in his 2 prior games when he showed deft touches & some aerial ability, but he sunk back to his normal self again last night!

Scholes was heaped with praises against Olympiakos last week & how he starred in the role of 'the hole' behind the sole striker.

Last night, he was unexceptional for the 1st 60 minutes, yet when Ole came on, the whole pattern of the game changed!

Ruud seemed re-charged & started playing like a natural winger with a couple of good dribbles & crosses from the right, Becks put in a couple of great crosses, & Scholes again showed International form!

Morale of the story?

Ole shud be the sole striker in Fergie's 4-4-1-1 system - he plays the role very well ( Norway uses him in that role ) & Scholes is his ideal foil, a role he was very uncomfortable in when he played behind Ruud last season!

While Ruud is 'recovering', he shud come in as super-sub, as seen when he inspired United at Charlton last week & at Villa in last season's FA Cup Tie!