Suedesi
Full Member
Certainly Ryan Giggs imo.
Ruud had a bad game also, although he just came back from injury.
Paul Scholes was fantastic.
Ruud had a bad game also, although he just came back from injury.
Paul Scholes was fantastic.
Originally posted by paulengland:
<strong>Id say Ruud.
He missed a few decent chances that could have settled the players earlier.
Giggs didnt do that bad.
You just dont like Welsh people</strong><hr></blockquote>
I was frustrated with Giggs; his last touch was worrisome last night.
Originally posted by Suedesi:
<strong>Certainly Ryan Giggs imo.
Ruud had a bad game also, although he just came back from injury.
Paul Scholes was fantastic.</strong><hr></blockquote>
Was he worse than Veron?
I think not
Even the Dutch commentator could not resist saying how shit Veron was last night
Originally posted by Rams:
<strong>Veron....
how anyone can say anyone other than Veron is beyond me </strong><hr></blockquote>
Veron was poor but Mickey was worse. Isn't Mickey carrying an injury at the moment. He played like he was.
Originally posted by Rams:
<strong>Veron....
how anyone can say anyone other than Veron is beyond me </strong><hr></blockquote>
I've come to not expect anything great from Veron. He'll always suffer in Premiership games where the tempo is much faster than in the CL.
Micky is a defender, anything good coming forward is a bonus.
Ryan was abysmal at times. How many times did he get the ball at the byline only to screw up his crosses?
Becks didn't have a good game either, but the guy worked his bollocks off, and at least he tracks down.
Ruud... is unfit. He needs a couple of goals from open play, and he'll be allright.
Originally posted by MancFanFromManc:
<strong>
Becks, Giggs, Ruud, Butt and Veron were all below par.
</strong><hr></blockquote>
Veron looked himself to me...
Originally posted by Suedesi:
<strong>
Micky is a defender, anything good coming forward is a bonus. </strong><hr></blockquote>
Exactly. When he attacks brilliantly and leave gaps people aren't happy. When he does well defensively and doesn't contribute much to the attack they are still unhappy!
Originally posted by Amir:
<strong>
Exactly. When he attacks brilliantly and leave gaps people aren't happy. When he does well defensively and doesn't contribute much to the attack they are still unhappy!</strong><hr></blockquote>
It's always like that unfortunately.
Originally posted by uranushk1:
<strong>Anyone who said Beckham played badly is beyond me. I didn't have the true statistic, but in my impression Beckham was the player who ran the most, get the ball the most and tried the hardest. </strong><hr></blockquote>At last some sense! Becks ran his bollocks off the whole night. Instead of blaming his crosses, maybe people should accept that our striker/s were rather sluggish. And as you say - had that chip gone in many on here would have been raving about how well he played.
Our best performers were Gaz, O'Shea, Scholes and Becks.
Originally posted by Stanley Road:
<strong>
Was he worse than Veron?
I think not
Even the Dutch commentator could not resist saying how shit Veron was last night</strong><hr></blockquote>
Are you saying that Ruud played better than veron? i dont think so.....everyone can score from the penalty spot!....and he was way too selfish! MOM scholes.
Originally posted by uranushk1:
<strong>It should be Veron again, with Giggs and Micky also below par. Anyone who said Beckham played badly is beyond me. I don't see Scholes played any better than him besides the goal, and if that chip from Becks has gone in instead of hitting the bar he would even have been MOM. I didn't have the true statistic, but in my impression Beckham was the player who ran the most, get the ball the most and tried the hardest. I'm angry that some so called "fans" can accuse our own captain as cheater. I know some Veron supporters like to critize everyone else in order to protect Veron, but face it, if Veron has tried half as hard as Beckham yesterday, he would not have lasted only 60 minutes on the field!</strong><hr></blockquote>
Becks had a decent game. He wasn't the worst player. He has worked hard since being criticised for only trying for Ingerlund. This apparently happened after the loss to Zalaegerszeg. Agree with you that had that chip gone in, he may well have been made MOM by the media, who are not necessarily the best judges.
Much has been said about Becks' "diving", here and on other forums. However biased we are, he does look like he is "diving", and is ridiculously bad at it.
Giving Becks the benefit of the doubt, could this be a consequence of his last injury? Dare I say it, instead of riding tackles, he leaps high out of a fear of getting badly injured? If this is the reason, couldn't he be just a little less theatrical about it?
I am a big admirer of Veron, and I think it is unfair to pass judgement on him in terms of tackles. Judge him on completion of passes, and, for want of a better word, "assists". The pass to put Mickey in down the wing early in the second half, perhaps only Eric could have done that. And no one said Eric was pants because he could not tackle, or did not work hard enough.
It is also not true that Veron does not try, and has a lower workrate. He always shows for the ball, even when he is not playing well. He may give away possession too easily, but he has too much pride to be accused of not trying.