eims
Guest
Who is better between the two?
I think both have qualities but Veron is the betterman and is going to get better and better, only time will improve him. Veron's vision is fantastic, passing long tricky ball in an unexpected way leaving the opponent losing their balance and stumbled. His skill is exceptional, a trademark of an Argentinian star. His shots, chips and freekicks could match Beckham if not better. As time goes, more of my points will be justified.
As for Roy, he is strong and fit, industrious and have never-say die attitude, but lacks skill in making long, accurate passes. We can trust him to lead MU but Veron gives us more confidence.
I would prefer Veron to play with Phil as he (Veron) seems to be feeling a bit inferior playing with stars, thus could not produce at his full-best.
What do you think...
I think both have qualities but Veron is the betterman and is going to get better and better, only time will improve him. Veron's vision is fantastic, passing long tricky ball in an unexpected way leaving the opponent losing their balance and stumbled. His skill is exceptional, a trademark of an Argentinian star. His shots, chips and freekicks could match Beckham if not better. As time goes, more of my points will be justified.
As for Roy, he is strong and fit, industrious and have never-say die attitude, but lacks skill in making long, accurate passes. We can trust him to lead MU but Veron gives us more confidence.
I would prefer Veron to play with Phil as he (Veron) seems to be feeling a bit inferior playing with stars, thus could not produce at his full-best.
What do you think...