Us Open

shyamg22

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Dec 28, 2003
Messages
905
Location
Fletcher is SHIT
Haven't seen a US Open thread in here so i wonder if there are any tennis fans on the caf, but what do you guys think of this year's open? It's been scary how lackadasical Federer can play and still beat whomever he faces. His game is really all-around and could break sampras' record for grandslams. One of the top atheletes in the world but doesn't get much press. A class act.

The american players are also putting on a good show after roddick's feck-up but it really is Federer's tournament to lose.
 
It's probably to do with Federer's scrunched up face making him look like he's having a shit, when in fact, he's really smiling.

I like tennis, btw. But McEnroe's right: the game lacks characters. And not of the Gimelstob variety, either. What a knob he is.

I'd throw it in some of the ladies on the tour, btw...so, there's still hope left in the game. Enjoy the Open.
 
Justin said:
:lol: at Hrbaty's shirt.
hehe yeah i noticed that, couldnt believe it, after the game Hewwit said he coule possibly lose to a bloke wearing shirt like that.. class.

About this years tournement, as usual want federer to win, although not playing close to his best, hopefully hel lift his game now in the big matches. Agassi done extremely well in getting this far, a little lucky with Nadal and roddick going out, both were on his side of the draw. An Agassi - Federer final would be something, and with crowd on his side, and Federer having an off day, he might have a chance.
 
DEB said:
I watched the Agassi v Blake match last night. Classic match ... I'm glad I didn't miss that one.

Agassi is just a pure legend. Nothing less, nothing more. F*cking brilliant.
 
I don't follow tennis, other than how Agassi fared, but I do think that if Federer was American, he'd be more hyped and have more endorsement offers.

As for Agassi, he's the Roger Clemens of tennis. He just keeps on going at an age when most of his colleagues have stopped playing or have well passed their prime.
 
Giggsy PO said:
Agassi is just a pure legend. Nothing less, nothing more. F*cking brilliant.
He was down 2 sets and a break and came back to win. Absolute class. And Blake was excellent as well.
 
federer dismantled nalbandian way too easy...its scary how good he is, i honestly think no one has a chance. federer will dismantle either hewitt, ginepri, or agassi. federer is so effortless and dominant on the court.
 
What an unbelivable comeback from Sharapova. 5 MP's.

100% bottle.

Currently 1 set each. I've got an outright bet on Clijsters....But I'd have no objection to Maria winning after this. (Especially when I've layed off. :p )
 
MrMarcello said:
As for Agassi, he's the Roger Clemens of tennis. He just keeps on going at an age when most of his colleagues have stopped playing or have well passed their prime.
Sure hes kept himself fit, but hes been pretty useless against big players in the last year or so and its been evident he couldnt match the top players consistantl anymore. This Us open hes gotten abit lucky with Nadal and Roddick going out early from his side of the draw. So its basically one good day out against hewwit/federer and its his title. But credit to the man, pretty amazing at his age, although he really would like to finish the way sampras did.
 
Another 5 set win for Agassi, 3rd in a row.
Would love it to see him beat Federer in the final.
Hmmmm......I sound like keegan
 
Federer badly off form today :( Not himself at all. It's quite obvious he could return but he let it go instead. Is this US Open Final the last match for Agassi?
 
And i didn't even want to watch the women's single final, everytime when i watched mary pierce playing, i fell asleep before the match ends. Of course plus Clijsters didn't lost many hardcourt matches and she should be more motivated as her winnings will be doubled.
 
Interesting match, first Federer showed clearly he's off-form (Still good though) then went to claim the third set through tie break and now Agassi who was playing very well, looks to be tired while IMO Federer got really motivated after the tie break.
 
okie, i feel really sad now for Agassi though i like both players. He's struggling and not getting any points. Thought his legs gone now. :(
 
Now we got Federer losing two championship points (!) and Agassi got his first match point in 4th Set.
 
2005 US OPEN CHAMPION!

3 sets to 1 for Federer. :D
Won on 3rd championship point.

63, 26, 76, 61.

Unforced Error Federer 37 Agassi 28
 
great match, wish i had been able to get tickets for this one rather than the pierce mauling last night.

credit to federer, he's unbeatable on his day.
 
Thought he really 'came out' and play only after the 3rd set when into tie break.
I agree with you though, unbeatable on his day. Unbeatable even though he played below his own standards in the 4th Rd against Kiefer!

Already a legend in my eyes.

My heart's going to crack....on one hand for Agassi (apparantly his last match, hope not!) and on the other, for Federer (back to back championship and yet another Grand Slam added! 6th of them now! Ho!).
 
federer is the most complete player ever. No one has combined power, grace, speed, and mental nous ever..not to mention the fact that he can hit any shot for a winner. never been a big agassi fan tbh, so im glad to see federer win this. his service reminds me a lot of sampras.
 
Magic, pure magic, iv actually become a big fan now, his game is just incredible.

Great match today, although the scoreline suggests otherwise(4th set in particular), Agassi had Federer abit rattlied today. In the third set Agassi seemed to have the momentum and had Federer on ropes for abit, but generally with roger, thats what gets him going and he raised the bar after that. Broke back, dominated the tie breaker and then some of his tennis in the fourth was unbelievable. Credit to Agassi for really competing, although i really felt he played as well as he possibly could, i actually dont think age had much to do with it, Agassi didnt lose the match because of fitness, form or fatigue. Federer just won it by raising his game, he just has another level, and he does it on the big points, in the crunch moments.
 
Federer finishes off Agassi in final
World’s top-ranked player wins second straight U.S. Open
Steve Wilstein ASSOCIATED PRESS
Posted: 9/11/2005 10:48 pm


NEW YORK — Andre Agassi has battled the champions of three eras — Pete Sampras, Boris Becker, John McEnroe, Jimmy Connors, Ivan Lendl — and now he puts Roger Federer above them all.

“He’s the best I’ve ever played against,” Agassi said after losing to Federer 6-3, 2-6, 7-6 (1), 6-1 Sunday in the U.S. Open final. “Pete was great. No question. But there was a place to get to with Pete. You knew what you had to do. If you do it, it could be on your terms. There’s no such place like that with Roger.

“He plays the game in a very special way that I haven’t seen before.”

Federer, a player of panache and unparalleled perfection in finals, withstood Agassi’s spirited upset bid to capture a second straight U.S. Open and sixth Grand Slam title.

Federer responded to his few moments of pressure by reeling off seven straight points in the tiebreak that turned the match around, then blew Agassi away in the fourth set to run his stunning record in finals over the past two years to 23-0. He has never lost in a major final.

“This is probably the most special Grand Slam final in my career,” Federer said. “To play against Andre in New York, it’s a dream.”

Federer moved into a tie with Becker and Stefan Edberg for Grand Slam titles among Open era players, and one behind McEnroe and Mats Wilander. Sampras holds the record with 14 Grand Slam titles, but at 24 years old Federer could well have a shot at that.

“That’s fantastic,” Federer said of tying Edberg and Becker. “Tying your idols — isn’t that great? It’s every boy’s dream and I made it come true today in a memorable final.”

Federer, flattered by Agassi’s comments, shied away from

pronouncing himself the best of all time.

“The best player of this generation, yes. Nowhere close to ever,” Federer said. “Just look at the records that some guys have. I’m a little cookie.”

Federer shrieked and leapt in the air when Agassi’s backhand return looped long on the championship point. The two men, who have the highest of respect for each other, shook hands warmly at the net.

“It’s been a tough road, but it’s been a great road,” Agassi told the cheering crowd. “Roger played way too good today. Congratulations Roger, well done.”

Though the 35-year-old Agassi was the oldest U.S. Open men’s finalist in 31 years, age had less to do with the difference in this match than Federer’s sheer strength, variety of serves, and superior balance of attacks from the baseline and the net that wore down Agassi.

The Swiss forced the action, going for winners more aggressively, dancing around the court with poise, unrattled even when Agassi had him down a break at 4-2 in the third set. For a while there, Agassi seemed to be on the verge of pulling one of the great upsets in sports history — on the order of Muhammad Ali’s shockers over Sonny Liston and George Foreman.

“At 2-4, in that third set,” Federer said, “I actually could see myself losing, and there were a few points I played there where I felt, ’Uh-oh, it’s gone.’ And then I managed to get it back again, and the title swam back into view.”

An 8-1 underdog, Agassi was just a few months removed from a career-threatening back injury that shot crippling pain down his right leg, led to his loss in the first round of the French Open and caused him to skip Wimbledon. He was playing a man who doesn’t lose in finals, is at the peak of his game and health, and was coming off his third straight Wimbledon championship.

If this was Agassi’s last U.S. Open after 20 straight — he won’t decide until the end of the year whether to retire — it was remarkable even in defeat.

“This certainly isn’t easy to do at any age, especially 35,” Agassi said. “It’s been a privilege to compete against so many great champions over the last couple of decades or so. Without exception, Roger has been one of most enjoyable to compete against. Thank you New York for the last 20 years. It’s been a great ride.”

Federer became the first man in the Open era, which started in 1968, to win Wimbledon and the U.S. Open back-to-back for in consecutive years.

Federer beat Agassi for the eighth straight time over the past two years after losing their first three meetings. Three of Federer’s victories in that streak have come at Grand Slam events, including the quarterfinals of the U.S. Open last year and the Australian Open this year.

“I had to play my best match of the tournament,” Federer said. “It happened I played my best in the finals, as usual. I don’t know how I do it, but it definitely feels great every single time.”

Federer drew first blood when he broke Agassi for a 4-2 lead in the first set, but putting that set away wasn’t easy. Agassi fended off three set points in his next service at 5-2, and won it with an ace. Federer needed five more set points when he served before he nailed down the set with a 123 mph service winner.

“He’s the only guy I’ve ever played against you hold serve to go 1-0 and you think all right, good,” Agassi said. “There’s a sense of urgency on every point, on every shot.”

Rather than shrink away, Agassi briefly showed the stuff that helped him win eight major titles. He broke Federer for a 2-0 lead in the second set, hammering a forehand return crosscourt that came back to Federer faster than his 111 mph serve. Agassi held serve the whole set, and raised hopes of an upset when he broke Federer again in the last game.

This was a crafty, sharp Agassi, sometimes creeping five or 10 feet inside the baseline to surprise Federer with short-hop returns, sometimes serving and volleying. Agassi lobbed for some points, won others with drops.

The crowd had been on Agassi’s side from the start, greeting him with chants of “Let’s go Andre” and chanting his name. But Federer asserted himself again, and after one exchange of breaks midway through the third set, the Swiss bulled his way through the tiebreak.

That, and getting run over in the fourth set, was enough to demoralize Agassi and make him think back about his trip to get this far — possibly ending his Grand Slam journey in New York, a city he hated when he first came as a young man with big hair, a big game and a different attitude.

“They can’t ever take away from what I’m leaving here with and that’s the memory of thousands of people pulling for me and showing appreciation for something I care dearly about,” he said.

Federer earned the $1.1 million top prize and distanced himself further from the rest of the men’s tennis world in the ATP Tour rankings. Agassi picked up $775,000, including $225,000 as the runner-up in the U.S. Open Series.

Federer won his 10th tournament this year and 32nd title overall — 20 on hard courts. He ran his 2005 record to 45-1 on hard courts and 71-3 overall, the most dominant year by a man since John McEnroe went 82-3 in 1984. Federer’s 35th straight hard court victory also broke Sampras’ mark, set twice, of 34 straight.

“I wonder why I always play so well, especially on the big occasions,” Federer said. “It seems to click for me.”
 
Amazing, actually is incredible how good is he at his best. :eek: He just won US Open at not being at his best. :eek:
 
MrMarcello said:
I'd don't recall hearing Federer's name till this year. But I don't follow the sport either. Seems he's quietly become the best in the world.
Thats just because of his personality, if he was like beckham, he would be the biggest thing around. IMO hes the best sportsman in the world. Tennis is a sport thats not easy to dominate and hes just making it look ridiculously easy, hes actually won this US open playing at 60%. In the crunch moments of the final he did raise it though.
 
Ern said:
NEW YORK — Andre Agassi has battled the champions of three eras — Pete Sampras, Boris Becker, John McEnroe, Jimmy Connors, Ivan Lendl — and now he puts Roger Federer above them all.

“He’s the best I’ve ever played against,” Agassi said after losing to Federer 6-3, 2-6, 7-6 (1), 6-1 Sunday in the U.S. Open final. “Pete was great. No question. But there was a place to get to with Pete. You knew what you had to do. If you do it, it could be on your terms. There’s no such place like that with Roger.

“He plays the game in a very special way that I haven’t seen before.”
Some great comments there from Agassi and it says alot.
What i also like about Federer is how much of a professional he is, he hardly ever argues with calls given against him, does splash himself all over the media.. And even when he praises himself(which happens rarely), its almost as if hes like a spectator analysing someone else and wondering 'how the feck did i do that'.