pathfinder
Full Member
United are planning to scrap main road, and build a new 90-100 thousand dream stadium. <img src="graemlins/nervous.gif" border="0" alt="[Nervous]" />
Originally posted by pathfinder:
<strong>United are planning to scrap main road, and build a new 90-100 thousand dream stadium. <img src="graemlins/nervous.gif" border="0" alt="[Nervous]" /> </strong><hr></blockquote>
Says who?
Originally posted by pathfinder:
<strong>United are planning to scrap main road, and build a new 90-100 thousand dream stadium. <img src="graemlins/nervous.gif" border="0" alt="[Nervous]" /> </strong><hr></blockquote>
links?
Originally posted by giggzy:
<strong>i thought the meant the main road outside OT, like GB said.. and not 'maine' road.....
anywayyyyyyyy........</strong><hr></blockquote>
Oh dear, I should have figured that out.... Isn't it better to buy the railway line to avoid mistakes?
Originally posted by pathfinder:
<strong>but there too smart </strong><hr></blockquote>
'they're'
Originally posted by blythy:
<strong>
'they're' </strong><hr></blockquote>
<img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" />
Originally posted by pathfinder:
<strong>there</strong><hr></blockquote>
their
Originally posted by giggzy:
<strong>perhaps the shittest thread ever?
altho, i like the idea of scrapping MainE Road </strong><hr></blockquote>
although
What is happening to it though?
Originally posted by Neil Thomson:
<strong>
although
What is happening to it though?</strong><hr></blockquote>
Public Toilets....
Moss Side needs them, coz the Curry Mile, is only a few seconds away, on foot.
Originally posted by b cridland:
<strong>why do we need a new stadium?</strong><hr></blockquote>
We don't, we just need to move the train line (it could go under the expanded South stand) and clear the terraced houses behind the South stand. Then make the South stand into a copy of the North satnd. And then fill in the corners to complete the stadium and have 92,000 seats. <img src="graemlins/devil.gif" border="0" alt="[Devil]" />
Oh, and then find a way of covering up the scaffold like structures holding the roofs up.
Originally posted by pathfinder:
<strong>that would take to long. United should take the FA to the european courts, and get this banned lifted on standing. Then rip the seats out. Should get around 115 thousand in then.</strong><hr></blockquote>
problem is united dont really want to do it for a few reasons
1. they dont want to
2. they charge more for seats, even though more people at a lower price for standing should balance it out.
3. they built the new stands at a certain incline which they would have to redevelop if you were standing.
twats
Originally posted by WeasteDevil:
<strong>FA, they could design a new South stand in such a way that the lower teir could be modified for standing (fold away seats) in domestic games if the law is ever changed, bit like some of the stadia in Germany.
We can't have a pure standing area, as UEFA won't allow standing.</strong><hr></blockquote>
never happen in the south stand the only place i can see it happening in the future is the front of the stret but i wouldnt hold my breath.
everyone knows the power united have if they wanted it the fa and probably uefa would buckle under pressure from united.
Originally posted by pathfinder:
<strong>We can't have a pure standing area, as UEFA won't allow standing.
So why are the Germans allowed to stand in there stadiums.Dortmund fans are also allowed to stand during champion league games.</strong><hr></blockquote>
as far as i knew the german stadiums revert to all seating for european games.
put it this way if all clubs demand then uefa wont have a choice but i dont think the clubs want it again
Originally posted by becks_rules:
<strong>OKAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY </strong><hr></blockquote>
what's that supposed to mean?
Originally posted by kimdeal:
<strong>
what's that supposed to mean?</strong><hr></blockquote>
ok?